SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Offseason

Créé par: BoltsFan9186
Équipe: 2024-25 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 14 janv. 2024
Publié: 14 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Wouldn’t move Zegras. Would rather him bust than be elite somewhere else if ur the Ducks. Move him to LW full time tho.

Barre Boulet, Zboril and Jost signed as low risk high reward signings. All compete for roster spots in camp against Bortuzzo, Johnston, Zellweger and LaCombe.

Krebs acquired as a rejuvenation project. If he costs anymore than that I wouldn’t do it.

Really prioritized signing veteran blueliners while keeping the forward core young and fast.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1775 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
22 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
2950 000 $
21 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
43 500 000 $
1800 000 $
15 000 000 $
23 500 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Campbell, Jack
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
2.
ANA
  1. Krebs, Peyton [Droits de RFA]
BUF
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (ANA)
3.
ANA
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2025 (PHI)
PHI
  1. McGinn, Brock (1 350 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2025 (ANA)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2025
Logo de ANA
Logo de EDM
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de PHI
2026
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2387 700 000 $71 569 167 $0 $6 550 000 $16 130 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 250 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 3
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
RFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG
RFA
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
812 500 $812 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance800 000 $$800K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
844 167 $844 167 $
DG
RFA - 2
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
RFA
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
UFA
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
UFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
RFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
RFA
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 janv. à 14 h 24
#1
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,149
Mentions "j'aime": 6,928
Modifié 14 janv. à 14 h 34
Feels like you are forgetting a rather major piece on the roster. Go check the reserve list for any names that stand out.

We can probably eat Campbells contract for two first, but would be sending a player like Stalock the other way. I think Campbell would rebound in a smaller market with less expectation on him. I think we're getting enough of a defense together to to not completely leave him out to dry, or I did until we started the Carolina Florida swing and we're just getting hammered out there. Probably have the cap space to ride out his deal though, Anaheim has shown success rehabbing goalies in the past.

With Gauthier being on the roster, there's no room from Krebs who I think you are paying too much for here. He's stuck on the 4th line and there's really no room above to rebuild his value.

Not sure how we get DeMelonto play first pair at 3.5 if we're paying Schultz 5, but I agree that we're going to need to buy a RHD this off season to play top pair for a while. Would rather keep Zellweger down until his waivers exemption expires, were going to need to start stretching out some of the guys in the AHL until roster spots open above.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 14 h 24
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 567
Mentions "j'aime": 94
u can keep Gibson, he's no different than Campbell lol
Oilers_29 et AntiAnalytics a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 14 h 25
#3
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,763
Mentions "j'aime": 25,581
Investing what is almost certain to be pick #35 (or better) in the Krebs experiment seems unduly risky to me. (See my esteemed friend @GiggyWithGibby's comment above.) I'd go along with you if it was the Boston second. And I'd offer the Pittsburgh 2024 third instead of the future third. But Vatrano - Krebs - Strome might be an effective third line.

I'm not a Schultz fan, especially if we're able to sign DeMelo.
14 janv. à 14 h 28
#4
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,149
Mentions "j'aime": 6,928
Quoting: sammy1414
u can keep Gibson, he's no different than Campbell lol


Oh ya bud, sure thing homer, remind me which league Campbell is playing in currently?
wojme et Nhl_oilers a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 14 h 30
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2023
Messages: 1,286
Mentions "j'aime": 357
Gibson isn’t that much of an upgrade oilers would be getting 6.4M backup no chance they do this
14 janv. à 14 h 42
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 567
Mentions "j'aime": 94
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Oh ya bud, sure thing homer, remind me which league Campbell is playing in currently?


use your brain! oilers shed 5million to take on 6.4 for another 3 years and give up 2 1st rounders?? common man
14 janv. à 14 h 43
#7
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,149
Mentions "j'aime": 6,928
Quoting: sammy1414
use your brain! oilers shed 5million to take on 6.4 for another 3 years and give up 2 1st rounders?? common man


Sooo, which league does Campbell play in?
14 janv. à 14 h 46
#8
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,314
Mentions "j'aime": 9,068
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Investing what is almost certain to be pick #35 (or better) in the Krebs experiment seems unduly risky to me. (See my esteemed friend GiggyWithGibby's comment above.) I'd go along with you if it was the Boston second. And I'd offer the Pittsburgh 2024 third instead of the future third. But Vatrano - Krebs - Strome might be an effective third line.

I'm not a Schultz fan, especially if we're able to sign DeMelo.


Buffalo has no reason to sell RFAs for picks
OldNYIfan et AntiAnalytics a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 14 h 48
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 567
Mentions "j'aime": 94
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Sooo, which league does Campbell play in?


yeah he plays in the ahl but I think u get my point that if your the oilers this trade makes no sense
14 janv. à 14 h 48
#10
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,314
Mentions "j'aime": 9,068
Quoting: sammy1414
u can keep Gibson, he's no different than Campbell lol


Both players have scouting reports and it's very clear Gibson is very different than Campbell
14 janv. à 14 h 51
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 567
Mentions "j'aime": 94
Quoting: Shibbal18
Both players have scouting reports and it's very clear Gibson is very different than Campbell


sure but Gibson is a cap dump
AntiAnalytics a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 15 h 4
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 8,018
Mentions "j'aime": 4,231
Quoting: sammy1414
u can keep Gibson, he's no different than Campbell lol



I’m an oilers fan too, but I can assure you that Gibson is miles better than Campbell. Although, I do agree that with Skinners recent level of play, we shouldn’t do this trade.

Stats for the two goalies:

Jack Campbell:
NHL: 5GP, 4.50GAA, .873SV%
AHL: 12GP, 3.21GAA, .898SV%

John Gibson:
NHL: 26GP, 3.10GAA, .900SV%
AHL: NOTHING!
14 janv. à 15 h 43
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,832
Mentions "j'aime": 3,816
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Investing what is almost certain to be pick #35 (or better) in the Krebs experiment seems unduly risky to me. (See my esteemed friend GiggyWithGibby's comment above.) I'd go along with you if it was the Boston second. And I'd offer the Pittsburgh 2024 third instead of the future third. But Vatrano - Krebs - Strome might be an effective third line.

I'm not a Schultz fan, especially if we're able to sign DeMelo.


Sabres aren’t trading Krebs for picks anyways
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 15 h 44
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,832
Mentions "j'aime": 3,816
@BoltsFan9186
What’s your reasoning that they Sabres would do this?
Bc we aren’t looking for futures
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage