SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TDL Moves

Créé par: ChiHawk
Équipe: 2023-24 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 14 janv. 2024
Publié: 14 janv. 2024
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Bourgault, Xavier
  2. Campbell, Jack
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Mrázek, Petr (1 900 000 $ retained)
2.
3.
CHI
  1. Robertson, Nicholas
  2. Samsonov, Ilya
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Dickinson, Jason (1 300 000 $ retained)
  2. Murphy, Connor
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2026
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2583 500 000 $83 570 958 $0 $6 137 500 $-70 958 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance505 000 $$505K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance250 000 $$250K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
962 500 $962 500 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
859 167 $859 167 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
C
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 janv. à 12 h 21
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 122
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Would a 2nd instead of Bourgault be enough? I don't think it would be wise to give up that many assets to move Campbell, probably be better off buying him out in the offseason.
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 12 h 22
#2
Mods have power egos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,687
Mentions "j'aime": 1,278
Drury counters with brodzinski for Bedard
14 janv. à 12 h 25
#3
CHYTIL 4 Conn Smythe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2023
Messages: 1,145
Mentions "j'aime": 227
Kakko isn't being traded for a rental, nor is he going to be used to dump Goodrow. Come on bro
SomeonesOffended, Newgod77, crimsonchin23 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 12 h 36
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,029
Mentions "j'aime": 9,333
Quoting: NYRxLundqvist
Drury counters with brodzinski for Bedard


Quoting: Coachchippy
Kakko isn't being traded for a rental, nor is he going to be used to dump Goodrow. Come on bro


The fact you even bring up Bedard in the context of Kaapo is laughable.

Raddysh isn't a rental, he's an RFA and today is better than KK, who has an amazing 3 points in 20 games. Hawks take a flyer on KK to see if change of scenery helps him while NYR gets rid of an awful contract and gets a better player today that is still young and can help them this season and the foreseeable as their cup window is open.
SomeonesOffended et Garak a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 12 h 42
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 371
Mentions "j'aime": 312
Kakko last year outperformed Raddysh’s career best when he was younger than Raddysh ever was in the NHL. You claim that Raddysh is better, but he was a rookie with 12 points in 53 games when he was the age Kakko is now. The Rangers are selling low on a young player in a slump for an older player with a lower ceiling in order to offshoot a contract that could easily be bought-out this summer. This is a bad proposal.
14 janv. à 12 h 45
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,029
Mentions "j'aime": 9,333
Quoting: Terrifiedofeveryone
Kakko last year outperformed Raddysh’s career best when he was younger than Raddysh ever was in the NHL. You claim that Raddysh is better, but he was a rookie with 12 points in 53 games when he was the age Kakko is now. The Rangers are selling low on a young player in a slump for an older player with a lower ceiling in order to offshoot a contract that could easily be bought-out this summer. This is a bad proposal.


Really? Raddysh had 20 goals on a terrible team while Kakko had 18 on a great team playing on top of the lineup and is back to his old self with 3 points in 20 games. Raddysh never played that bad.
Garak a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 12 h 55
#7
Mods have power egos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,687
Mentions "j'aime": 1,278
Quoting: ChiHawk
The fact you even bring up Bedard in the context of Kaapo is laughable.

Raddysh isn't a rental, he's an RFA and today is better than KK, who has an amazing 3 points in 20 games. Hawks take a flyer on KK to see if change of scenery helps him while NYR gets rid of an awful contract and gets a better player today that is still young and can help them this season and the foreseeable as their cup window is open.


I thought we were just making dumb trades
14 janv. à 12 h 58
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 371
Mentions "j'aime": 312
Quoting: ChiHawk
Really? Raddysh had 20 goals on a terrible team while Kakko had 18 on a great team playing on top of the lineup and is back to his old self with 3 points in 20 games. Raddysh never played that bad.


Kakko spent the vast majority of last season on the third line with Lafreniere and Chytil, and Raddysh also had 3 points in his first 20 games when he was a year older than Kakko is now. You should maybe try doing some quick research before you throw out nonsense.
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 13 h 8
#9
adam.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 296
Mentions "j'aime": 81
Quoting: ChiHawk
Really? Raddysh had 20 goals on a terrible team while Kakko had 18 on a great team playing on top of the lineup and is back to his old self with 3 points in 20 games. Raddysh never played that bad.


Kakko played on the third line for most of last year on a team that was decent but not great
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 13 h 32
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 701
Mentions "j'aime": 164
Leafs would need Murphy 50% retained, Dickinson is a maybe but we’d need a 3rd team to retain as well as I’m sure the hawks wanna keep an extra retention slot after this trade. Tyler Johnson is someone I’d like to try and get in TOR as well.
14 janv. à 13 h 47
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 3,478
Mentions "j'aime": 1,451
Drury says not even close and hangs up.
14 janv. à 13 h 58
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 8,533
Mentions "j'aime": 10,387
Rangers don't make that trade. They aren't using Kakko to dump Goodrow. And Hawks don't make that Toronto deal. Robertson barely pays to dump Samsonov. A 1st isn't getting Murphy and Dickinson. That's not even close.
crimsonchin23 a aimé ceci.
14 janv. à 14 h 24
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,029
Mentions "j'aime": 9,333
Modifié 14 janv. à 14 h 43
Quoting: Terrifiedofeveryone
Kakko spent the vast majority of last season on the third line with Lafreniere and Chytil, and Raddysh also had 3 points in his first 20 games when he was a year older than Kakko is now. You should maybe try doing some quick research before you throw out nonsense.


First of all, KK has 5 years in the NHL and Raddysh 4. When Raddysh "played that bad" he was on the bottom line in Tampa...that team was stacked and Tampa was competing and needed a better player and did not have the patience (nor should they) to develop Raddysh...sounds earily familiar to the Ranger with Kappo...except, Kappo has been afforded more opportunity than Raddysh did in Tampa; look at TOI differences.

So, how does your comment help the Rangers out this season and making a run for the cup? Maybe you should try grasping the reality Kappo isn't nearly the player everyone thought he would be when he was drafted and very unlikely he ever will be which doesn't help the Rangers now. Grabbing a player that is clearly playing better is what matters when chasing a cup in addition to getting rid of cap dump while the rangers are competitive makes a lot of sense. But forget this season, or next, focus on the future and hoping Kappo comes around because that makes so much sense!
14 janv. à 14 h 32
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,029
Mentions "j'aime": 9,333
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Rangers don't make that trade. They aren't using Kakko to dump Goodrow. And Hawks don't make that Toronto deal. Robertson barely pays to dump Samsonov. A 1st isn't getting Murphy and Dickinson. That's not even close.


Dickinson is worth a late 2nd. Murphy, not retained, is worth a 2nd or 2nd and 3rd. Robertson is worth a late 2nd or 3rd. Dumping Sammy would not cost more than a 3rd for the Leafs. The trade works out.

Rangers need 3rd line help and Goodrow is a boat anchor so they get an upgrade with Raddysh and are able to dump a $3.7M cap hit for the next 4 years. Whether they do the trade or not who knows, but the value is there for the rebuilding Hawks to see if they can get something out of KK that's better than Raddys and fits their rebuild better, and the Rangers get a player they can rely on now to compete.
14 janv. à 14 h 48
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,239
Mentions "j'aime": 2,278
Quoting: ChiHawk
The fact you even bring up Bedard in the context of Kaapo is laughable.

Raddysh isn't a rental, he's an RFA and today is better than KK, who has an amazing 3 points in 20 games. Hawks take a flyer on KK to see if change of scenery helps him while NYR gets rid of an awful contract and gets a better player today that is still young and can help them this season and the foreseeable as their cup window is open.


Lol if rangers want Raddysh, they’ll trade picks for him

If he’s such the better player than Kakko, then why trade for Kakko and goodrow lol
14 janv. à 16 h 2
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 8,533
Mentions "j'aime": 10,387
Quoting: ChiHawk
Dickinson is worth a late 2nd. Murphy, not retained, is worth a 2nd or 2nd and 3rd. Robertson is worth a late 2nd or 3rd. Dumping Sammy would not cost more than a 3rd for the Leafs. The trade works out.

Rangers need 3rd line help and Goodrow is a boat anchor so they get an upgrade with Raddysh and are able to dump a $3.7M cap hit for the next 4 years. Whether they do the trade or not who knows, but the value is there for the rebuilding Hawks to see if they can get something out of KK that's better than Raddys and fits their rebuild better, and the Rangers get a player they can rely on now to compete.


Well, at least you got Dickinson's value and the cost to dump Sammy right...
14 janv. à 18 h 28
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,029
Mentions "j'aime": 9,333
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Well, at least you got Dickinson's value and the cost to dump Sammy right...


No, it would cost (2) late 2nds and either another late 2nd or 3rd to get a late 1st back. Dickinson + Murphy...there's your late 1st. Robertson for dumping Sammy. It's just math
14 janv. à 18 h 30
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,029
Mentions "j'aime": 9,333
Quoting: Rags21
Lol if rangers want Raddysh, they’ll trade picks for him

If he’s such the better player than Kakko, then why trade for Kakko and goodrow lol


You're missing the point LOL....Rangers need someone who can perform now; Raddysh is playing better than Kappo. Hawks need someone good in 2 more years, Hawks can work on developing Kappo + cap space will help the Rangers...now do you understand the approach? rolling eyes
14 janv. à 18 h 41
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 8,533
Mentions "j'aime": 10,387
Quoting: ChiHawk
No, it would cost (2) late 2nds and either another late 2nd or 3rd to get a late 1st back. Dickinson + Murphy...there's your late 1st. Robertson for dumping Sammy. It's just math


Seriously? So the Hawks trade Murphy and Dickinson retained for a 1st? That's your math? Again sorry, but that some bad math. No way do the Hawks do this.
14 janv. à 19 h 7
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,029
Mentions "j'aime": 9,333
Quoting: Hawksguy81
Seriously? So the Hawks trade Murphy and Dickinson retained for a 1st? That's your math? Again sorry, but that some bad math. No way do the Hawks do this.


Yes, (2) late 2nds, and a late 3rd equal a late 1st....that's not my math...that's what the trade boards say from the pros. They assign value to early, mid and late picks in each round.
14 janv. à 22 h 37
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 599
Mentions "j'aime": 180
Quoting: ChiHawk
Really? Raddysh had 20 goals on a terrible team while Kakko had 18 on a great team playing on top of the lineup and is back to his old self with 3 points in 20 games. Raddysh never played that bad.


Kakko had 18 goals playing on the third line. Not the top of the lineup... Raddysh had 16:00 + minutes per game. Kakko's never gone above 15:30.
Laf is breaking out now that he's getting a consistent 16+ minutes per game on a top line. Kakko just needs time as his game is more defensively structured than Laf's.
We're not moving him for anything but another kid his age or younger.
15 janv. à 8 h 50
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,239
Mentions "j'aime": 2,278
Quoting: ChiHawk
You're missing the point LOL....Rangers need someone who can perform now; Raddysh is playing better than Kappo. Hawks need someone good in 2 more years, Hawks can work on developing Kappo + cap space will help the Rangers...now do you understand the approach? rolling eyes


Lmao let’s not act like Raddysh is a 30 goal scorer here. You’re talking about Kakko’s 1 slow start and eventually got hurt lol

If they want to add Raddysh for the bottom 6, rangers would give you picks and a lesser prospect
15 janv. à 11 h 24
#23
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,029
Mentions "j'aime": 9,333
Quoting: Rags21
Lmao let’s not act like Raddysh is a 30 goal scorer here. You’re talking about Kakko’s 1 slow start and eventually got hurt lol

If they want to add Raddysh for the bottom 6, rangers would give you picks and a lesser prospect


I wouldn't call it "1 slow start" let's be honest.
15 janv. à 11 h 26
#24
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,029
Mentions "j'aime": 9,333
Quoting: slater417
Kakko had 18 goals playing on the third line. Not the top of the lineup... Raddysh had 16:00 + minutes per game. Kakko's never gone above 15:30.
Laf is breaking out now that he's getting a consistent 16+ minutes per game on a top line. Kakko just needs time as his game is more defensively structured than Laf's.
We're not moving him for anything but another kid his age or younger.


There is a reason Kakko hasn't earned the minutes. He's been incredibly streaky and never has broken out. 5 years in the NHL so far and he's a 3rd liner no more so far. Since the Rangers are fighting for a cup, get the better player that has 1 year less in the NHL despite being 1 year older. He would slot in the 3rd line a lot better to compete for the cup.
15 janv. à 11 h 59
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 5,239
Mentions "j'aime": 2,278
Quoting: ChiHawk
I wouldn't call it "1 slow start" let's be honest.


Lol not every single top 5 pick comes into the league and lights it up. He’s extremely good at defense and puck possession. He’s also on a team where he doesn’t have to be #1 scorer

He’s still only 22 years old with great defense analytics and able to score 40 points at 5v5. Meanwhile people make him out to be a non-NHL player who doesn’t belong in the league lol
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage