Modifié 14 déc. 2023 à 15 h 40
Quoting: tjk
I think you've severely overvalued Granlund. The best one is the Goodrow trade, but even still iffy with the 1st.
How so? People always say these vague comments - probably don’t watch the Sharks games - and don’t have much to back it up?
I stated Grandlunds production reduces and he sits time for injuries.
.73 pace instead of his current .90 (I believe) so I’ve reduced his play, not overvalued or inflated it. And he’s still producing miles ahead of
Greenway (could not tell you where he’s even playing)
Bertuzzi (UFA)
Ellers (well rounded bottom 6 C)
Each returned over a 2nd. Bertuzzi was a UFA, played 29 games and still produced less than Granlund currently who still has months till the TDL. Granlunds been nothing short of a thrill to watch lately, earned the NHL star of the week (rightfully). Grandlund will be at 2.5m for 2 playoff runs.
Why should he be traded for less than Tyler Bertuzzi? Goodrows 3.6m x 4 years + a prospect who the Rangers don’t need, and a first for a non rental top 6 player? Seems very level to me.
If I had just said (no names)
The rangers dumped 15m, a good (but relatively expected to be a non heavy point producing winger) prospect, and a first for a top 6 player - .75 point pace - with 2 years and a 50% 2.5m AAV; wouldn’t you say that it seems level headed?