SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

blockbuster blue

Créé par: Dave_LFFE
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 11 déc. 2023
Publié: 11 déc. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Site doesn't show the 50% retained salary. Which is almost 4.8 mil. Still leaves, almost 950 , below the cap with a full 23 man roster.
Transactions
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $87 377 367 $0 $0 $-3 877 367 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C, AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 583 283 $9 583 283 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
875 000 $875 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 déc. 2023 à 18 h 23
#1
FKA Bigtittielarper
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 7,778
Mentions "j'aime": 2,239
Leafs decline everyday of the week and twice on Sundays lol anytime you gotta add nylander and a first or Cowan or BOTH it’s just not gonna happen lol
11 déc. 2023 à 18 h 25
#2
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,291
Mentions "j'aime": 7,079
Modifié 11 déc. 2023 à 18 h 32
So you want Columbus to pay $25 million dollars for the right to sign Nylander to one of the biggest UFA contracts of the next decade, downgrade from Laine for Bertuzi, and the payment for all of that is a late first and a couple of prospects that pale in comparison to what Columbus already has in their pipeline?

And you know you can input retention, right? It's part of the trade, the little + symbol next to the players name let's you type in a retention dollar value.
squashmaple et SK101 a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2023 à 18 h 31
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,297
Mentions "j'aime": 666
Now why tf would Columbus do this lmao
GiggywithGibby, squashmaple et SK101 a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2023 à 18 h 32
#4
Max G
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 135
Mentions "j'aime": 42
Why would the leafs give up their player whos playing best currently for two guys who can't stay consistent plus a top 6 forward plus 2 top prospects on the leafs.
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2023 à 18 h 40
#5
Démarrer sujet
Prepare for MORE
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 65
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
So you want Columbus to pay $25 million dollars for the right to sign Nylander to one of the biggest UFA contracts of the next decade, downgrade from Laine for Bertuzi, and the payment for all of that is a late first and a couple of prospects that pale in comparison to what Columbus already has in their pipeline?

And you know you can input retention, right? It's part of the trade, the little + symbol next to the players name let's you type in a retention dollar value.


ya i did that it worked on my end but not when it posted. but thanks
11 déc. 2023 à 18 h 48
#6
Impatient
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 309
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Remember when Patrick Laine thought he should be the 1st overall pick over Auston Matthews?
Laine 492 gp, 200 g, 182 a, 382 pts. Matthews 498 gp, 313 g, 250 a, 563 pts.
Laine is a 1 dimensional $6.6M player who gets healthy scratched. Why would the Leafs want him? Werenski, now he is worth trading for, but you have the Leafs overpaying huge. Cowan is a 1st, then you are adding another, don't care about adding Voit, don't need to add Bertuzzi, I guess we could add Timmins. Adding Nylander is plain silly. Would consider Werenski straight up for Nylander. If you insist you add boat anchor Laine Leafs request you retain $3.3M & Leafs offer Reaves, insurance paid Klingberg, Benoit, Lagesson and pray we can offload Laine.
SomeonesOffended a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2023 à 18 h 53
#7
Démarrer sujet
Prepare for MORE
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 65
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: Letsgosharks
Now why tf would Columbus do this lmao


Quoting: Letsgosharks
Now why tf would Columbus do this lmao


How are they playing? Do they have the right mix? Do they wanna save money, and push forward to the first overall pick?
any other questions?
11 déc. 2023 à 19 h 9
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 1,297
Mentions "j'aime": 666
Quoting: Dave_LFFE
How are they playing? Do they have the right mix? Do they wanna save money, and push forward to the first overall pick?
any other questions?


Well like you are giving them Nylander, so they really won't get any worse if he keeps playing like he is, he will not resign there, so they are just giving 2 major players they committed to for a late first and a bunch of players leafs fans overrate

Not even to mention that you want 50% retained xD

And also for leafs why would they even send Nylander away who is playing truly Elite
11 déc. 2023 à 19 h 10
#9
Démarrer sujet
Prepare for MORE
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 65
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: GolfBall
Remember when Patrick Laine thought he should be the 1st overall pick over Auston Matthews?
Laine 492 gp, 200 g, 182 a, 382 pts. Matthews 498 gp, 313 g, 250 a, 563 pts.
Laine is a 1 dimensional $6.6M player who gets healthy scratched. Why would the Leafs want him? Werenski, now he is worth trading for, but you have the Leafs overpaying huge. Cowan is a 1st, then you are adding another, don't care about adding Voit, don't need to add Bertuzzi, I guess we could add Timmins. Adding Nylander is plain silly. Would consider Werenski straight up for Nylander. If you insist you add boat anchor Laine Leafs request you retain $3.3M & Leafs offer Reaves, insurance paid Klingberg, Benoit, Lagesson and pray we can offload Laine.


Quoting: GolfBall
Remember when Patrick Laine thought he should be the 1st overall pick over Auston Matthews?
Laine 492 gp, 200 g, 182 a, 382 pts. Matthews 498 gp, 313 g, 250 a, 563 pts.
Laine is a 1 dimensional $6.6M player who gets healthy scratched. Why would the Leafs want him? Werenski, now he is worth trading for, but you have the Leafs overpaying huge. Cowan is a 1st, then you are adding another, don't care about adding Voit, don't need to add Bertuzzi, I guess we could add Timmins. Adding Nylander is plain silly. Would consider Werenski straight up for Nylander. If you insist you add boat anchor Laine Leafs request you retain $3.3M & Leafs offer Reaves, insurance paid Klingberg, Benoit, Lagesson and pray we can offload Laine.


Quoting: GolfBall
Remember when Patrick Laine thought he should be the 1st overall pick over Auston Matthews?
Laine 492 gp, 200 g, 182 a, 382 pts. Matthews 498 gp, 313 g, 250 a, 563 pts.
Laine is a 1 dimensional $6.6M player who gets healthy scratched. Why would the Leafs want him? Werenski, now he is worth trading for, but you have the Leafs overpaying huge. Cowan is a 1st, then you are adding another, don't care about adding Voit, don't need to add Bertuzzi, I guess we could add Timmins. Adding Nylander is plain silly. Would consider Werenski straight up for Nylander. If you insist you add boat anchor Laine Leafs request you retain $3.3M & Leafs offer Reaves, insurance paid Klingberg, Benoit, Lagesson and pray we can offload Laine.


Quoting: GolfBall
Remember when Patrick Laine thought he should be the 1st overall pick over Auston Matthews?
Laine 492 gp, 200 g, 182 a, 382 pts. Matthews 498 gp, 313 g, 250 a, 563 pts.
Laine is a 1 dimensional $6.6M player who gets healthy scratched. Why would the Leafs want him? Werenski, now he is worth trading for, but you have the Leafs overpaying huge. Cowan is a 1st, then you are adding another, don't care about adding Voit, don't need to add Bertuzzi, I guess we could add Timmins. Adding Nylander is plain silly. Would consider Werenski straight up for Nylander. If you insist you add boat anchor Laine Leafs request you retain $3.3M & Leafs offer Reaves, insurance paid Klingberg, Benoit, Lagesson and pray we can offload Laine.


Quoting: GolfBall
Remember when Patrick Laine thought he should be the 1st overall pick over Auston Matthews?
Laine 492 gp, 200 g, 182 a, 382 pts. Matthews 498 gp, 313 g, 250 a, 563 pts.
Laine is a 1 dimensional $6.6M player who gets healthy scratched. Why would the Leafs want him? Werenski, now he is worth trading for, but you have the Leafs overpaying huge. Cowan is a 1st, then you are adding another, don't care about adding Voit, don't need to add Bertuzzi, I guess we could add Timmins. Adding Nylander is plain silly. Would consider Werenski straight up for Nylander. If you insist you add boat anchor Laine Leafs request you retain $3.3M & Leafs offer Reaves, insurance paid Klingberg, Benoit, Lagesson and pray we can offload Laine.
11 déc. 2023 à 19 h 24
#10
Démarrer sujet
Prepare for MORE
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 65
Mentions "j'aime": 2
you cant just be a fan, you have to give to get. you also have to manage your cap. be real,.
11 déc. 2023 à 20 h 5
#11
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,384
Mentions "j'aime": 4,704
Get real with that retention, first of all. Absolutely not. A late first and some prospects that wouldn’t scratch Columbus’s top five is no incentive at all to trade a franchise cornerstone for a rental as a last place team. And that’s not even considering the obvious fact that Werenski would never approve this.
Letsgosharks et SK101 a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2023 à 20 h 56
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,338
Mentions "j'aime": 3,077
Outside of Matthews there’s literally nothing the jackets would trade Toronto werenski half retained lol
11 déc. 2023 à 23 h 26
#13
Impatient
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 309
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Quoting: SK101
Outside of Matthews there’s literally nothing the jackets would trade Toronto werenski half retained lol


Reading is a skill. I want 1/2 retention if we were to take on Laine. No need to retain on Werenski but also no need for us to back up the brings truck which was the original ask.
12 déc. 2023 à 0 h 7
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,338
Mentions "j'aime": 3,077
Quoting: GolfBall
Reading is a skill. I want 1/2 retention if we were to take on Laine. No need to retain on Werenski but also no need for us to back up the brings truck which was the original ask.


You think laine is a negative asset? Let alone one worth 25 million in retention? Lol Toronto must have great dope up there. Like i said there’s literally nothing Toronto could offer to get werenski half retained
12 déc. 2023 à 7 h 44
#15
Impatient
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 309
Mentions "j'aime": 48
Quoting: SK101
You think laine is a negative asset? Let alone one worth 25 million in retention? Lol Toronto must have great dope up there. Like i said there’s literally nothing Toronto could offer to get werenski half retained


Yes, Laine is a negative asset tied to an inflated contract. I never said anything about retaining half on Werenski.
12 déc. 2023 à 9 h 2
#16
We Need D!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 1,258
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Looks like GM Ferguson is back. We will also toss in Woll for your 3rd string goalie🙄
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage