Modifié 5 déc. 2023 à 7 h 33
Quoting: dgibb10
Damn, good to know you don’t think Ullmark can sustain a 0.915 or handle a starters workload.
Bc like I said that’s all Ullmark has to do and then it’s Ullmark and a 2nd for Lindholm and NJD provides the 2 1sts
Where are you getting that? My open issue with your deal is you are presenting a downside risk without presenting an upside benefit. It’s one sided.
If Calgary were in (and I doubt they would be), I’d expect upside if I’m giving you downside protection
If he hits .915 and finishes in the top 5 for a Vezina in either of the next two years, Jersey adds another second round pick to Boston in 2026.
If he hits .915 and you win a title or he wins a Vezina in either of the next two years, you upgrade that pick in 26 to a first.
If he fails to hit .915 this year and doesn’t recover in 24-25 to the levels above, you pay only a second round pick in 2024
At that point, I’m OK with the downside risk you are asking me to take.
You get a guaranteed Vezina caliber goalie for a first and a second round pick. If he wins the best goalie in the league or you win a championship, you pay an additional first. If he performs average, you only pay a second only.