SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next Up Buch

Créé par: Canucks33
Équipe: 2023-24 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 1 déc. 2023
Publié: 1 déc. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
1975 000 $
Transactions
STL
  1. Garland, Conor
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2026
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $84 080 417 $850 000 $0 $-580 417 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AG, AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
975 000 $975 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 déc. 2023 à 15 h 26
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 3,053
Mentions "j'aime": 1,466
Easy no for the blues
1 déc. 2023 à 15 h 48
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 2,802
Mentions "j'aime": 1,426
There's very little benefit to the Blues doing this. We lose out on the opportunity to extend Buch, we severely downgrade, cut almost no salary (which is completely fine), and we are only compensated with a late 1st and most likely a late 2nd and a couple of mid round picks.

I would say drop the 3rd and 4th and add in Willander/Lekkerimaki + Woo/Bruscewitz and condition the 2nd to bump based on Canucks success. You're getting asking for an elite player on a bargain of a contract for 2 cup runs. If it's too much that's fine, there's no reason at all for the Blues to sell Buch short this season and most likely i'd imagine he gets extended pretty reasonably.
1 déc. 2023 à 16 h 4
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,214
Mentions "j'aime": 1,078
Quoting: AC14
There's very little benefit to the Blues doing this. We lose out on the opportunity to extend Buch, we severely downgrade, cut almost no salary (which is completely fine), and we are only compensated with a late 1st and most likely a late 2nd and a couple of mid round picks.

I would say drop the 3rd and 4th and add in Willander/Lekkerimaki + Woo/Bruscewitz and condition the 2nd to bump based on Canucks success. You're getting asking for an elite player on a bargain of a contract for 2 cup runs. If it's too much that's fine, there's no reason at all for the Blues to sell Buch short this season and most likely i'd imagine he gets extended pretty reasonably.


So you would ask for 1st 2024 + 1st/2nd 2025 + Willander/Lekkerimaki + Woo/Bruscewitz? I understand that you aim high but that's ridiculous.

I understand that there's no reason to move Buch and you'd be happy to keep him. But what are the odds that a) Buch wants to re-sign in STL and b) STL wants to commit big money and term to a 30 year old winger?
1 déc. 2023 à 16 h 43
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2023
Messages: 220
Mentions "j'aime": 38
Quoting: Canucks33
So you would ask for 1st 2024 + 1st/2nd 2025 + Willander/Lekkerimaki + Woo/Bruscewitz? I understand that you aim high but that's ridiculous.

I understand that there's no reason to move Buch and you'd be happy to keep him. But what are the odds that a) Buch wants to re-sign in STL and b) STL wants to commit big money and term to a 30 year old winger?


I think Buch would be happy to come back to St. Louis but I agree I'm not sure the Blues want to go long term with him as he doesn't really fit our window for contention.
I think realistically if the trade is with Vancouver, the Blues will want Lekkerimaki or Willander coming back. Now if either of those 2 are in the package I don't think it's going to be a TON else like listed above but still if the Blues decide to trade Buch there will be a bidding war for him and the Blues will likely get a ton. So a teams top prospects have to be on the table in a serious discussion.
Canucks33 a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2023 à 18 h 25
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 2,802
Mentions "j'aime": 1,426
Quoting: Canucks33
So you would ask for 1st 2024 + 1st/2nd 2025 + Willander/Lekkerimaki + Woo/Bruscewitz? I understand that you aim high but that's ridiculous.

I understand that there's no reason to move Buch and you'd be happy to keep him. But what are the odds that a) Buch wants to re-sign in STL and b) STL wants to commit big money and term to a 30 year old winger?


Not sure. But in all reality that’s a very similar return that I asked for that Timo Meier got as an expiring RFA with a 10m QO. You’re asking for an 1st liner at half of a normal 1st liners cap hit all while having us take on additional year on the Garland contract which is an ok contract but certainly does nothing to help us reach our goals.

Hell what you proposed is much worse than Horvat just netted you guys as an expiring UFA.

Baseline for my thinking was

Willander > Mukmahdullin
Woo/Brusc = Ohkotiuk
Johnsson was a one year cap dump not 3
And there’s no Zetterlund
Canucks33 a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2023 à 18 h 40
#6
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,458
Mentions "j'aime": 11,407
Big ol' miss. The Blues are going g to prioritize young players and prospects over draft picks.
1 déc. 2023 à 21 h 19
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,214
Mentions "j'aime": 1,078
Quoting: AC14
Not sure. But in all reality that’s a very similar return that I asked for that Timo Meier got as an expiring RFA with a 10m QO. You’re asking for an 1st liner at half of a normal 1st liners cap hit all while having us take on additional year on the Garland contract which is an ok contract but certainly does nothing to help us reach our goals.

Hell what you proposed is much worse than Horvat just netted you guys as an expiring UFA.

Baseline for my thinking was

Willander > Mukmahdullin
Woo/Brusc = Ohkotiuk
Johnsson was a one year cap dump not 3
And there’s no Zetterlund


Taking on the Garland contract is a fair point and requires some value attached to it besides STL hypothetically liking him as a player. But also consider that
a) Buch has a M-NTC (could angle his way to 2-4 particular teams)
b) Most teams that would be interested in Buch do not have cap space (this was listed as a major reason why we got Zadorov for cheap despite CGY not wanting to move him to us)
c) Other interested teams may not have prospects as good as Lekkerimaki or a contract they can easily move to make cap space.

The thing with Willander and Bruscewitz is that they are RHD, which is a premium asset and the kind that never gets moved. Every team in the league that offered a valuable piece to NYR in the last 2-3 years has asked for Schneider (including us with Miller probably) and it hasn't happened, young RHD just don't get moved. Consider further that RHD is an area of need for VAN and we have barely had any in the system at all over the last number of years, let alone prospects as good as those guys look right now. I don't think they can be compared to the Makmahdullin or Ohkotiuk (especially cause SJS clearly went for quantity over quality in that specific deal). I understand Buch is a premier asset and you have to ask high, but in reality VAN isn't including one of those guys let alone both.

I think Garland + Lekkerimaki + 1st 2024 for Buch is at least a solid framework for a deal with the understanding that the market will dictate if anything else needs to be added.
BluesReport18 a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2023 à 23 h 12
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 2,802
Mentions "j'aime": 1,426
Quoting: Canucks33
Taking on the Garland contract is a fair point and requires some value attached to it besides STL hypothetically liking him as a player. But also consider that
a) Buch has a M-NTC (could angle his way to 2-4 particular teams)
b) Most teams that would be interested in Buch do not have cap space (this was listed as a major reason why we got Zadorov for cheap despite CGY not wanting to move him to us)
c) Other interested teams may not have prospects as good as Lekkerimaki or a contract they can easily move to make cap space.

The thing with Willander and Bruscewitz is that they are RHD, which is a premium asset and the kind that never gets moved. Every team in the league that offered a valuable piece to NYR in the last 2-3 years has asked for Schneider (including us with Miller probably) and it hasn't happened, young RHD just don't get moved. Consider further that RHD is an area of need for VAN and we have barely had any in the system at all over the last number of years, let alone prospects as good as those guys look right now. I don't think they can be compared to the Makmahdullin or Ohkotiuk (especially cause SJS clearly went for quantity over quality in that specific deal). I understand Buch is a premier asset and you have to ask high, but in reality VAN isn't including one of those guys let alone both.

I think Garland + Lekkerimaki + 1st 2024 for Buch is at least a solid framework for a deal with the understanding that the market will dictate if anything else needs to be added.


While I mostly agree with you. RHD wasn’t the focal point but however is the focal point of your prospect group. We are just so stocked at forward prospects that it shouldn’t be a priority. Kyrou and Thomas are signed for 8. Schenn for 4-5. Neighbors looks great so far. Then we have Dvorsky, Snuggerud, Bolduc, Stenberg and Dean who are likely to become NHLers.

It’s a good fit but a bad fit if premiums are being thrown on.
Canucks33 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage