SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Whatcha think Bruins fans

Créé par: AntiAnalytics
Équipe: 2023-24 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 30 nov. 2023
Publié: 30 nov. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
BOS
  1. Clifton, Connor
  2. Mittelstadt, Casey
Détails additionnels:
We could take back more Cap if needed, or hold Cap on Clifton &/or Mitts
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2025
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de MIN
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de NSH
2026
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $75 515 237 $0 $4 820 000 $7 984 763 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
918 333 $918 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 100 000 $7 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance525 000 $$525K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
762 500 $762 500 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 285 714 $4 285 714 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
837 500 $837 500 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 nov. 2023 à 13 h 21
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 505
Mentions "j'aime": 120
Lol nah man, whoever told you what Carlo's value was lied
30 nov. 2023 à 13 h 21
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 1,257
Mentions "j'aime": 729
Cliffy hockey not working out for ya
30 nov. 2023 à 13 h 22
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,614
Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
Quoting: Newgod77
Cliffy hockey not working out for ya


He’s been “ok”
Carlo is jut better- always looking to upgrade
Newgod77 a aimé ceci.
30 nov. 2023 à 13 h 27
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,251
Mentions "j'aime": 6,238
I wouldn't hate this. Mittelstadt has been pretty good, but I'd rather help on d (assuming Carlo can play top 4)
AntiAnalytics a aimé ceci.
30 nov. 2023 à 13 h 28
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,614
Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
Modifié 30 nov. 2023 à 14 h 19
Quoting: Schood1c
Lol nah man, whoever told you what Carlo's value was lied


I think a top6 Center for a top4 RD makes sense
Let’s not act like Carlo is Bobby Orr

Mittelstadt is 25 & really coming into his own, playing at almost a ppg pace for us
Maybe I’m wrong, but it seems like u guys could use some legit Center talent & Mitts would be a good fit
He could be 100 point player if he’s with Pasta or Marchand
30 nov. 2023 à 13 h 34
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 99
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
I think a top6 Center for a op4 RD makes sense
Let’s not act like Carlo is Bobby Orr

Mittelstadt is 25 & really coming into his own, playing at almost a ppg pace for us
Maybe I’m wrong, but it seems like u guys could use some legit Center talent & Mitts would be a good fit

He could be 100 point player if he’s with Pasta or Marchand


He has a lot more value to BOS than on the market. On top of the great contract with term, He's a legit top 3-4 D-Man, and a lot of his metrics never show up not to mention his leadership.
Sweeney refused to involve him for Horvat so it'd unfortunately have to be like Cozens for Carlo with some other fillers which i don't think BUF would do.
I still think there's a trade to be made, but involving Mittlestadt i still think Ullmark is the piece going back
Schood1c a aimé ceci.
30 nov. 2023 à 13 h 37
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,614
Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
Quoting: sabres89
I wouldn't hate this. Mittelstadt has been pretty good, but I'd rather help on d (assuming Carlo can play top 4)


He’s playing top4 on Boston
If he can do it for them, i don’t see why he can’t do it for us?
30 nov. 2023 à 13 h 40
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,614
Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
Quoting: JMB423
He has a lot more value to BOS than on the market. On top of the great contract with term, He's a legit top 3-4 D-Man, and a lot of his metrics never show up not to mention his leadership.
Sweeney refused to involve him for Horvat so it'd unfortunately have to be like Cozens for Carlo with some other fillers which i don't think BUF would do.
I still think there's a trade to be made, but involving Mittlestadt i still think Ullmark is the piece going back


Maybe Carlo is wishful thinking on my part

Mitts for Ullmark is wishful thinking on yours though
We aren’t gonna trade u guys a ppg Center for less than 2yrs of a good (not “great”) goalie
sabres89 a aimé ceci.
30 nov. 2023 à 13 h 49
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 99
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Maybe Carlo is wishful thinking on my part

Mitts for Ullmark is wishful thinking on yours though
We aren’t gonna trade u guys a ppg Center for less than 2yrs of a good (not “great”) goalie


oh i agree it wouldn't be straight up, but he's certainly turned in to more than a "good" goalie the past 2 years.
May be the defensive haven that is BOS system, or goalie coach Bob Essenza,

But you also can't call Mitts a PPG Center yet. Hes on that pace now, but off that logic, Ullmark is a top 5 goalie in the league for the past 2 years and Mitts off that logic is also a "rental" since he's not re-signed
30 nov. 2023 à 13 h 56
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,614
Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
Quoting: JMB423
oh i agree it wouldn't be straight up, but he's certainly turned in to more than a "good" goalie the past 2 years.
May be the defensive haven that is BOS system, or goalie coach Bob Essenza,

But you also can't call Mitts a PPG Center yet. Hes on that pace now, but off that logic, Ullmark is a top 5 goalie in the league for the past 2 years and Mitts off that logic is also a "rental" since he's not re-signed


Lol, nice “sales job”
Ullmark came up with us- we know EXACTLY how good he is
And playing on a great defensive team like Boston will make just about any goalie look better

Let’s put it this way:
If u guys trade Ullmark to us, do u really think he wins the Vezina again?? NO CHANCE

Conversely,
Mittelstadt playing with Pasta or Marchand is likely to be even more productive than he currently is (20pts in 22games)
sabres89 a aimé ceci.
30 nov. 2023 à 14 h 2
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 99
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Lol, nice “sales job”
Ullmark came up with us- we know EXACTLY how good he is
And playing on a great defensive team like Boston will make just about any goalie look better

Let’s put it this way:
If u guys trade Ullmark to us, do u really think he wins the Vezina again?? NO CHANCE

Conversely,
Mittelstadt playing with Pasta or Marchand is likely to be even more productive than he currently is (20pts in 22games)



Hey we're talking trades, gotta put each at top value haha
30 nov. 2023 à 14 h 5
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,614
Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
Quoting: JMB423
Hey we're talking trades, gotta put each at top value haha


I’d prefer if we just conversed plainly, without the BS
30 nov. 2023 à 14 h 25
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2023
Messages: 488
Mentions "j'aime": 327
If Boston wasn't willing to sign Clifton at that value, then they probably wouldn't want him in any trade unless there was retention, so it would definitely require holding money on him.
Mittelstadt might be able to be a point per game player, but Carlo is already a shutdown number 3 that can pair with most puck moving D.
I'd much rather stick with Carlo. There are centers out there that won't cost roster players to get
AntiAnalytics a aimé ceci.
30 nov. 2023 à 14 h 41
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,765
Mentions "j'aime": 1,172
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Lol, nice “sales job”
Ullmark came up with us- we know EXACTLY how good he is
And playing on a great defensive team like Boston will make just about any goalie look better

Let’s put it this way:
If u guys trade Ullmark to us, do u really think he wins the Vezina again?? NO CHANCE

Conversely,
Mittelstadt playing with Pasta or Marchand is likely to be even more productive than he currently is (20pts in 22games)


You do realize he’s gone from a fundamentally unsound goalie to very fundamentally sound under Essensa.
30 nov. 2023 à 14 h 50
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,793
Mentions "j'aime": 8,838
Modifié 30 nov. 2023 à 15 h 9
We laugh hysterically.

Would not trade him for Landeskog.

Would not trade him for Horvat.

Playing best hockey of his career.

Let’s trade him for…checks notes…Mittlestedt. 🙄

Creates a massive hole a fixes nothing. Boston needs a goal scoring wing or a true #1C. Mitts is neither of these things.

His inability to win faceoffs, defend, play with any physicality, means they won’t put him in a center position. He’s a playmaking LW. Something they don’t really need. While i think he’d pair well as the LW for Zacha and Pasta and do very well there. It does not offset the loss of Carlo.
30 nov. 2023 à 15 h 5
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,614
Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
Quoting: Celtics21
You do realize he’s gone from a fundamentally unsound goalie to very fundamentally sound under Essensa.


I’m not gonna argue about it
The Sabres won’t trade Mitts for Ullmark imo, the end
sabres89 a aimé ceci.
30 nov. 2023 à 15 h 15
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,614
Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
Quoting: SJSF
If Boston wasn't willing to sign Clifton at that value, then they probably wouldn't want him in any trade unless there was retention, so it would definitely require holding money on him.
Mittelstadt might be able to be a point per game player, but Carlo is already a shutdown number 3 that can pair with most puck moving D.
I'd much rather stick with Carlo. There are centers out there that won't cost roster players to get


I appreciate your reasonable response, thanks
30 nov. 2023 à 15 h 44
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,505
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Bruins lack RHD depth to even consider trading Carlo. If they moved Carlo, they have to either play Clifton or Shattenkirk on the 2nd pairing....and neither guys is remotely close to second pairing material. Boston also doesn't have a lot in the way of young RHD in the pipeline, so Carlo is untouchable outside of a no-brainer overpay type deal.
AntiAnalytics a aimé ceci.
30 nov. 2023 à 15 h 54
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,614
Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
Quoting: ON3M4N
Bruins lack RHD depth to even consider trading Carlo. If they moved Carlo, they have to either play Clifton or Shattenkirk on the 2nd pairing....and neither guys is remotely close to second pairing material. Boston also doesn't have a lot in the way of young RHD in the pipeline, so Carlo is untouchable outside of a no-brainer overpay type deal.


Fair enough
My thinking was that Boston could “get by” with the downgrade at RD2 bc their overall team defense was so strong
30 nov. 2023 à 18 h 42
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,505
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Fair enough
My thinking was that Boston could “get by” with the downgrade at RD2 bc their overall team defense was so strong


Carlo is a big reason they have a strong defense. He's the best bure defender and their horse on the PK.
30 nov. 2023 à 19 h 18
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,614
Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
Quoting: ON3M4N
Carlo is a big reason they have a strong defense. He's the best bure defender and their horse on the PK.


Yeah, i get that. I don’t want him bc he sucks, lol
1 déc. 2023 à 11 h 23
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,505
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Yeah, i get that. I don’t want him bc he sucks, lol


Ok so if you take away their biggest and best pure defender than overall defense is going to take a significant hit lol.
1 déc. 2023 à 13 h 2
#23
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,614
Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
Quoting: ON3M4N
Ok so if you take away their biggest and best pure defender than overall defense is going to take a significant hit lol.


Not necessarily
U guys lost Bergeron & Krejci, and are still trucking along just fine

Not to say it wouldn’t have an affect at all,
but (like i said) u play such good team defense overall that i figured u could sustain the loss

Nbd though
Appreciate your feedback
ON3M4N a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2023 à 14 h 14
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,505
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: AntiAnalytics
Not necessarily
U guys lost Bergeron & Krejci, and are still trucking along just fine

Not to say it wouldn’t have an affect at all,
but (like i said) u play such good team defense overall that i figured u could sustain the loss

Nbd though
Appreciate your feedback


I think the Bruins goaltending has masked some of this. The Bruins last year gave up the 8th fewest SOG/GP. This year they've allowed the 10 most SOG/GP. If you look at goalies with at least 10GP, Swayman ranks #2 in SV% and Ullmark is 7th in SV% for the season. Boston's goaltending has been lights out for the most part and in the games they've been even average, the Bruins have lost.
AntiAnalytics a aimé ceci.
1 déc. 2023 à 14 h 22
#25
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 5,614
Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
Quoting: ON3M4N
I think the Bruins goaltending has masked some of this. The Bruins last year gave up the 8th fewest SOG/GP. This year they've allowed the 10 most SOG/GP. If you look at goalies with at least 10GP, Swayman ranks #2 in SV% and Ullmark is 7th in SV% for the season. Boston's goaltending has been lights out for the most part and in the games they've been even average, the Bruins have lost.


I feel like u guys don’t really put your goalies in tough spots either though
What your high danger chances against look like ?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage