I would not trade Poitras for Lindholm straight up. He is 10 years younger, cost controlled for years to come, and he is already showing flashes of potentially being a long time top 6 C. There is almost nothing I would trade him for at this time.

The Lindhom trade is close the rest aren't.



LOL. No worries about that happening. Calgary wouldn't accept this offer anyhow. Poitras + Lohrei + that 2025 1st should get it done though. 1st line centers don't come cheap and Lindholm is the perfect Bergeron replacement for Boston. Marchand - Lindholm - Pastrnak would be another dominant line for Boston.

CBJ isn't paying a 3rd to move Peeke and take on an additional $2.2 million for each of the next three years. Their interest in Garland, if you rounded to the nearest whole number, would be 0%.

I think CBJ could and should put a competitive package together for Lindholm though. Personally, I would trade Sillinger, Boqvist or Peeke, and a protected 2024 or 2025 1st rounder.

Really selling low on tanev

If this is the cost, then these two teams won't be making a trade involving Lindholm. Too bad, I agree he would be great on the 1st line in Boston. The Bruins need to restock the coffers, and this would be the opposite of that.

Delusional.

Calgary will not even get half of the value of that Boston trade for Lindholm. You should lower your expectations. Poitras is untouchable.

1st + Lysell sure not problem. You lost me when you threw Poitras in that. Boston isn't moving him, nor are they moving Lohrei. The Horvat deal from last season is the comp that CGY should be using.

I believe NHL rules that you can only have 2 retained salaries on books at a time.

After Prosvetov's performance yesterday against the Blues, I don't think we need to worry about a goalie at the moment.
For the Coyotes, I honestly don't know

Actually it's 3.

My mistake. One player cannot be retained more than twice. Got that mixed up - my bad. Thanks.