SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The 2024 Stanley Cup Champions

Créé par: RobbieM86
Équipe: 2023-24 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 16 oct. 2023
Publié: 16 oct. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
12 000 000 $
Transactions
OTT
  1. Garland, Conor (2 475 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de VAN
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2026
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $80 604 047 $0 $1 850 000 $2 895 953 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 475 000 $2 475 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
835 000 $835 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
762 500 $762 500 $
AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
916 667 $916 667 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 oct. 2023 à 19 h 24
#1
Danny B is here
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 5,063
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
So Vancouver has to retain for 3 years, gives up the best player in the trade, and gives up a 2nd. While getting a player nobody claimed, a decent defenseman, and a 4th liner owed $9M. Why on earth would they accept this?
mv21227 a aimé ceci.
16 oct. 2023 à 19 h 24
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,332
Mentions "j'aime": 9,495
Canucks aren’t retaining half and adding a 2nd to take on a cap dump and lose cap space in the trade
GMDannyB a aimé ceci.
16 oct. 2023 à 19 h 37
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,626
Mentions "j'aime": 6,498
This definitely isn't the cup winning team and Vancouver isn't doing that unless you are sending them a minimum of 2 1sts
16 oct. 2023 à 22 h 17
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 108
Mentions "j'aime": 7
Ok so let me break this down -
Garland has requested the trade - his value was just cut in half
So far this preseason and three games, Mathue Joseph has proven to be competitive and, when given the time on ice, can play - no longer will the Sens pay to get rid of him
Brannstrom is a top 4 two way more offensive-minded player who can play both sides and something Canucks need
JBD is a big stay-at-home man who is a highly desired player who has no room in our current lineup but would benefit Canucks when they want to be competitive in a year or two - for cheap

Yes, Canucks will take on Garland's salary for three Canucks Roster players who can fill some serious holes. (Garland is the same player quality as Joseph at half the price.
16 oct. 2023 à 22 h 44
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,332
Mentions "j'aime": 9,495
Quoting: RobbieM86
Ok so let me break this down -
Garland has requested the trade - his value was just cut in half
So far this preseason and three games, Mathue Joseph has proven to be competitive and, when given the time on ice, can play - no longer will the Sens pay to get rid of him
Brannstrom is a top 4 two way more offensive-minded player who can play both sides and something Canucks need
JBD is a big stay-at-home man who is a highly desired player who has no room in our current lineup but would benefit Canucks when they want to be competitive in a year or two - for cheap

Yes, Canucks will take on Garland's salary for three Canucks Roster players who can fill some serious holes. (Garland is the same player quality as Joseph at half the price.


Joseph PPG by season: 0.32, 0.43, 0.34, 0.19, 0.37
Joseph career PPG: 0.35

Garland PPG by season: 0.57, 0.68, 0.80, 0.57, 0.38
Garland career PPG: 0.60

Garland is also very good defensively. He’s a much better player than Joseph

I like Brannstrom, but he’s a borderline top 4 dman. A solid #4/5 dman. The Canucks don’t seem to want to play any LHDs on the right side though, so not sure he’d be a fit

If JBD was as desirable of a player as you said then he would have been claimed on waivers. He clearly doesn’t have much value (again I do like him though)

The main thing is the Canucks want to move Garland to clear cap. They aren’t retaining 50% on the clear best player in the trade, taking back a 3M cap dump 4th liner, as well as another 2M dman AND giving up a 2nd round pick

The 2nd is probably equal to the value of Brannstrom + JBD, which leaves a 50% retained Garland for Joseph. Considering it’s been rumoured Ottawa would have to add a 1st to dump Joseph, you’d have to add at least one 1st, and probably another 1st to acquire Garland with that much retention
theleano1 et Dickie_Dunn a aimé ceci.
17 oct. 2023 à 8 h 49
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,513
Mentions "j'aime": 3,727
Tyler Kleven is not ready enough to be better than Brannstrom, you need Brann for now. He is the only guy who can step in the top-4 if there is an injury and actually be good.

Mathieu Joseph is ELITE on the PK and his top speed creates havoc all over the ice. He has worked like a madman this summer and his shot is quite improved. He's going to put a season that will make his 2.95 AAV look like a bargain. He is more needed than Garland. With Norris and Pinto, and considering Greig is already a high quality Top-9 forward, there is absolutely no spot in the Top-9

It's a good deal for the Sens but not what they need to do. It is simply to trade Kubalik but no idea why it hasn't been done already outside of Dorion being clueless as usual.

Of course CF is going to tell you that it is an horrible trade because of how slow hockey fans in general are on getting updated on things outside of their own team. Some still think Brannstrom is a bust tears of joy

Quoting: mv21227
Joseph PPG by season: 0.32, 0.43, 0.34, 0.19, 0.37
Joseph career PPG: 0.35

Garland PPG by season: 0.57, 0.68, 0.80, 0.57, 0.38
Garland career PPG: 0.60

Garland is also very good defensively. He’s a much better player than Joseph

I like Brannstrom, but he’s a borderline top 4 dman. A solid #4/5 dman. The Canucks don’t seem to want to play any LHDs on the right side though, so not sure he’d be a fit

If JBD was as desirable of a player as you said then he would have been claimed on waivers. He clearly doesn’t have much value (again I do like him though)

The main thing is the Canucks want to move Garland to clear cap. They aren’t retaining 50% on the clear best player in the trade, taking back a 3M cap dump 4th liner, as well as another 2M dman AND giving up a 2nd round pick

The 2nd is probably equal to the value of Brannstrom + JBD, which leaves a 50% retained Garland for Joseph. Considering it’s been rumoured Ottawa would have to add a 1st to dump Joseph, you’d have to add at least one 1st, and probably another 1st to acquire Garland with that much retention

Your post was good until that. Joseph is not a 4th liner nor a "cap dump" in any way, shape, or form. Some teams might have wanted to bend Dorion over due to a specific cap crunch situation but luckily Sens have been high on Joseph for a long time so he made the right decision (doesn't happen that often)
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage