SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The center they should go for

Créé par: V123
Équipe: 2023-24 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 24 août 2023
Publié: 24 août 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
BOS
STL
  1. Grzelcyk, Matt (900 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $82 557 382 $4 500 000 $500 000 $942 618 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 785 715 $1 785 715 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 475 000 $3 475 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 137 500 $1 137 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 août 2023 à 21 h 45
#1
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,792
Mentions "j'aime": 31,487
Hayes at little under $4M was worth a 6th.

Why is he worth 1st+ at little under $2M?
exo2769 et V123 a aimé ceci.
24 août 2023 à 22 h 58
#2
Démarrer sujet
Vegas Repeat
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 1,442
Mentions "j'aime": 766
Quoting: justaBoss
Hayes at little under $4M was worth a 6th.

Why is he worth 1st+ at little under $2M?


You do make a good point. I’ll change the trade a little bit
24 août 2023 à 23 h 0
#3
Démarrer sujet
Vegas Repeat
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 1,442
Mentions "j'aime": 766
Quoting: justaBoss
Hayes at little under $4M was worth a 6th.

Why is he worth 1st+ at little under $2M?


Is this better
24 août 2023 à 23 h 2
#4
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,792
Mentions "j'aime": 31,487
Quoting: V123
Is this better


Value wise sure, but now I have to question why would STL do that? Don't they have enough 2nd pair LHDs already?
V123 a aimé ceci.
24 août 2023 à 23 h 7
#5
Démarrer sujet
Vegas Repeat
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 1,442
Mentions "j'aime": 766
Quoting: justaBoss
Value wise sure, but now I have to question why would STL do that? Don't they have enough 2nd pair LHDs already?


Can never have enough right?? He’s on a one year deal anyways so they can just trade him at the TDL for a second or whatever
24 août 2023 à 23 h 9
#6
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,792
Mentions "j'aime": 31,487
Quoting: V123
Can never have enough right?? He’s on a one year deal anyways so they can just trade him at the TDL for a second or whatever


Maybe. Just think they'd benefit from having Hayes more since he actually fills a need for them.

I doubt they are going to start the season with the assumption that they're selling later down the line, they want to upgrade from last year.
V123 a aimé ceci.
24 août 2023 à 23 h 11
#7
Démarrer sujet
Vegas Repeat
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 1,442
Mentions "j'aime": 766
Quoting: justaBoss
Maybe. Just think they'd benefit from having Hayes more since he actually fills a need for them.

I doubt they are going to start the season with the assumption that they're selling later down the line, they want to upgrade from last year.


That is a good point. I just don’t see St.Louis making the playoffs, so I won’t wouldn’t be surprised if they sold some pieces
24 août 2023 à 23 h 12
#8
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,792
Mentions "j'aime": 31,487
Quoting: V123
That is a good point. I just don’t see St.Louis making the playoffs, so I won’t wouldn’t be surprised if they sold some pieces


That'll clear up around January-February time. Personally I think they've got a chance, I'd argue aside from ARI and DAL every team in Central is worse now than last year.
V123 a aimé ceci.
24 août 2023 à 23 h 14
#9
Démarrer sujet
Vegas Repeat
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 1,442
Mentions "j'aime": 766
Quoting: justaBoss
That'll clear up around January-February time. Personally I think they've got a chance, I'd argue aside from ARI and DAL every team in Central is worse now than last year.


That is a good point. It could be anyone’s game in the central. If Boston really wanted him, I’m sure they would gladly overpay for Hayes to continue being good. If you were St.Louis, would you accept a 1st for Hayes?? Sure they need him but that’s a good offer. I don’t k wk just a thought
24 août 2023 à 23 h 18
#10
Xercuses
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 13,506
Mentions "j'aime": 3,616
This trade makes no sense
Why are the blues trading Scotty p and Rosen too

Not to mention they just got Hayes so they won’t trade him
24 août 2023 à 23 h 20
#11
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,792
Mentions "j'aime": 31,487
Quoting: V123
That is a good point. It could be anyone’s game in the central. If Boston really wanted him, I’m sure they would gladly overpay for Hayes to continue being good. If you were St.Louis, would you accept a 1st for Hayes?? Sure they need him but that’s a good offer. I don’t k wk just a thought


Absolutely I would - what a great asset management would that be from STL GM, turning a 6th into a 1st.

Problem is though that BOS is not in position to move a first for a center like that, they already are missing their 2024 one after trading it for Bertuzzi, and the 2025 pick is also locked as conditional one on that trade. 2026 1st could be in play, but I'd be hesitant to move that quickly too, given Bruins prospect pool is pretty dreadful right now.

Bergeron and Krejci retiring drove them to a bit of a corner...
V123 a aimé ceci.
24 août 2023 à 23 h 22
#12
Démarrer sujet
Vegas Repeat
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 1,442
Mentions "j'aime": 766
Quoting: justaBoss
Absolutely I would - what a great asset management would that be from STL GM, turning a 6th into a 1st.

Problem is though that BOS is not in position to move a first for a center like that, they already are missing their 2024 one after trading it for Bertuzzi, and the 2025 pick is also locked as conditional one on that trade. 2026 1st could be in play, but I'd be hesitant to move that quickly too, given Bruins prospect pool is pretty dreadful right now.

Bergeron and Krejci retiring drove them to a bit of a corner...


Hey it’s Boston. Sure their prospect pool is pretty bad, but I wouldn’t be surprised if Sweeney moved a first for a centre to continue being competitive.
24 août 2023 à 23 h 25
#13
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,767
Mentions "j'aime": 11,506
The Bs could certainly acquire Hayes, but the value here is waaaay off with all the retention and Grz wouldn't be of interest anyway. Frankly, I don't think they have the trade capital to swing it with retention and I highly doubt the Blues just hand you Perunovich.
V123 a aimé ceci.
24 août 2023 à 23 h 27
#14
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,792
Mentions "j'aime": 31,487
Quoting: V123
Hey it’s Boston. Sure their prospect pool is pretty bad, but I wouldn’t be surprised if Sweeney moved a first for a centre to continue being competitive.


Perhaps.

My suggestion would be pulling a 2015 again. One year retool to stockpile on things.

That core is not good enough and I think they know it too. I would take the pending UFAs they have and turn them into prospect/draft capital later down the line and hope they fall into the bottom-10 - that way they can keep their 2024 1st and get a good prospect.

After that, full send on the UFA market to bring in a proper 1C for 2024-25, whether it's Lindholm, Scheifele, Stamkos...there's plenty of better options in there than there is now, and now that their core is renewing anyway with Bergeron/Krejci retiring they got time to build again.

Selling DeBrusk, Ullmark, Grzelcyk for draft capital could end up being extremely valuable for them, as long as they don't f*ck up with the drafting again, similar to how they did in 2015.
V123 a aimé ceci.
24 août 2023 à 23 h 31
#15
Démarrer sujet
Vegas Repeat
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 1,442
Mentions "j'aime": 766
Quoting: justaBoss
Perhaps.

My suggestion would be pulling a 2015 again. One year retool to stockpile on things.

That core is not good enough and I think they know it too. I would take the pending UFAs they have and turn them into prospect/draft capital later down the line and hope they fall into the bottom-10 - that way they can keep their 2024 1st and get a good prospect.

After that, full send on the UFA market to bring in a proper 1C for 2024-25, whether it's Lindholm, Scheifele, Stamkos...there's plenty of better options in there than there is now, and now that their core is renewing anyway with Bergeron/Krejci retiring they got time to build again.

Selling DeBrusk, Ullmark, Grzelcyk for draft capital could end up being extremely valuable for them, as long as they don't f*ck up with the drafting again, similar to how they did in 2015.


That’s a great plan. Suck for this year and then become competitive again in 24-25
justaBoss a aimé ceci.
25 août 2023 à 1 h 3
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 2,892
Mentions "j'aime": 1,472
There’s no reason for the blues to do this or retain on hayes
mokumboi a aimé ceci.
25 août 2023 à 7 h 57
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,605
Mentions "j'aime": 5,467
Definitely pass. Hayes is not a top line center and may not even be a 2nd liner soon.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage