SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The most obvious trade

Créé par: Kyle_Okposo_Lover
Équipe: 2023-24 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 10 août 2023
Publié: 10 août 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Accurate/Prorated
LTIR activée: Non
Journées à la saison: 186
Journées restantes: 185
Saison restante: 99%
Masse salariale projetée avant les jours restants Info-bulle : 78 770 833 $
Transactions
1.
CBJ
VAN
  1. Höglander, Nils
  2. Myers, Tyler
Détails additionnels:
ignore this glitch
2.
CBJ
  1. Höglander, Nils
  2. Myers, Tyler
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
Three way
3.
CBJ
  1. Lindblom, Oskar
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (SJS)
4.
CBJ
    Sharks move Myers with 50% retention on Myers at TDL
    SJS
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2024
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CBJ
    2025
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de VGK
    2026
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CBJ
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2383 500 000 $71 876 433 $0 $6 900 000 $11 623 567 $
    Masse salariale proratée

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    9 750 000 $9 697 581 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    950 000 $944 892 $ (Bonis de performance3 200 000 $$3M)
    C
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    8 700 000 $8 653 226 $
    C, AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    925 000 $920 027 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
    AG, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    2 000 000 $1 989 247 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    925 000 $920 027 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    1 525 000 $1 516 801 $
    AG, C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    3 750 000 $3 729 839 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    1 100 000 $1 094 086 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 500 000 $2 486 559 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    2 500 000 $2 486 559 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    900 000 $895 161 $
    AD, AG
    RFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    9 583 333 $9 531 810 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    6 250 000 $6 216 398 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    5 400 000 $5 370 968 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    4 725 000 $4 699 597 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    918 333 $913 396 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
    DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    1 050 000 $1 044 355 $
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    2 333 333 $2 320 788 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    825 000 $820 565 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    1 600 000 $1 591 398 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    975 000 $969 758 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    762 500 $758 401 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    10 août 2023 à 19 h 54
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2018
    Messages: 2,660
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,174
    Canucks pass Hoggys a keeper.IMHO.
    Kyle_Okposo_Lover a aimé ceci.
    10 août 2023 à 20 h 19
    #2
    Tank it baby
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 6,791
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,605
    Quoting: remowilliams
    Canucks pass Hoggys a keeper.IMHO.


    The name alone is 🔥. Hoglander. 😁
    remowilliams a aimé ceci.
    10 août 2023 à 20 h 23
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    Josh Anderson Sucks
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2022
    Messages: 4,863
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,037
    Quoting: remowilliams
    Canucks pass Hoggys a keeper.IMHO.


    Im not gonna debate you on that because I really liked him as a prospect so I wouldnt give up if i was a canucks fan either

    But, is it worth holding onto him if he wont get a real shot to play? If you move Garland or Boeser I could see him having a spot in the lineup but right now I just cant see it. Hope im wrong tho
    remowilliams a aimé ceci.
    10 août 2023 à 20 h 41
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 8,270
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,700
    Sharks should do it if theirs $2 Mil retention on Gudbranson
    10 août 2023 à 20 h 55
    #5
    Ex Nucks fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 17,615
    Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
    Quoting: Kyle_Okposo_Lover
    Im not gonna debate you on that because I really liked him as a prospect so I wouldnt give up if i was a canucks fan either

    But, is it worth holding onto him if he wont get a real shot to play? If you move Garland or Boeser I could see him having a spot in the lineup but right now I just cant see it. Hope im wrong tho


    Garland is pretty much on his way out. Just doesn’t fit well in our lineup unfortunately even though he is a very good player
    10 août 2023 à 21 h 0
    #6
    not a he )
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2022
    Messages: 3,349
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,664
    I am failing to see what Columbus gets out of this. No, wasting a retention slot for Gudbranson for three more years isn’t it.
    Trevor31lv, Indy et SK101 a aimé ceci.
    10 août 2023 à 21 h 21
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 977
    Mentions "j'aime": 837
    What's the incentive for Columbus?

    They're getting out of 3 mil a year on Gru (not even the full contract), but it's coming at the cost of both of their good depth RD options which would then leave them with a void there.
    Indy a aimé ceci.
    10 août 2023 à 21 h 47
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Josh Anderson Sucks
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2022
    Messages: 4,863
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,037
    Quoting: Trevor31lv
    What's the incentive for Columbus?

    They're getting out of 3 mil a year on Gru (not even the full contract), but it's coming at the cost of both of their good depth RD options which would then leave them with a void there.


    Severson and Jiricek are both easily better... And Peeke and Boqvist have no future with the team imo. Youve got way better options coming up, one of Boqvist or Peeke need to go before the season starts because Jiricek is NHL top 4 ready and you dont want to bury one of them on the third pair where they lose all value. You get mostly out of a horrific deal and you clear a good amount of cap. Thats what it is.
    10 août 2023 à 21 h 57
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 977
    Mentions "j'aime": 837
    Quoting: Kyle_Okposo_Lover
    Severson and Jiricek are both easily better... And Peeke and Boqvist have no future with the team imo. Youve got way better options coming up, one of Boqvist or Peeke need to go before the season starts because Jiricek is NHL top 4 ready and you dont want to bury one of them on the third pair where they lose all value. You get mostly out of a horrific deal and you clear a good amount of cap. Thats what it is.


    Who whole reason Peeke and Boqvist's future with the team is up in the air right now is because of the crowed D room. You have both of them plus Grubrandson with his albatross of a contract for 1-2 spots (depending if Jiricek starts in the A or not). If you move all 3 out that Jiricek is locked in (which I don't necessarily is a bad thing, but I don't think a few months in Cleveland would hurt) and then a 3rd spot for who? Bean, who definitely doesn't have a future with the team? Then next year and possibly the year after you have a spot to fill as you wait for Ceulemans or someone else.

    If you're paying one of Boqvist/Peeke to move out Gru, the other has to stay, otherwise you end up with the opposite issue of what you have now and you basically get nothing in return. The team doesn't need cap space right now, so moving out that money isn't an issue.
    11 août 2023 à 1 h 35
    #10
    Indy
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2022
    Messages: 384
    Mentions "j'aime": 297
    Unless he get a buyout Gudbranson is going to stay in Columbus for the forseeable future, especially with the NMC. He was brought in not so much for his play but as an enforcer/player coach for a young locker room. Teams really value that spite and I think people on sites like these forget about how important locker room presence is and only focus on the on ice ones. My guess he will play 24-25 season then buy out year 4 as by that time Jiricek should be good and ready with the RHD1 with Cuelmans potentially coming up as a RHD2/3. Then Gudbranson most likely then joins Dorsett as part of the player development team as I am sure Rick Nash is going to become GM and Jarmo moving to operations...you can't tell me that he's low key being groomed right now with all the media appearances he made this summer as he's usually really reserved but that's my conspiracy theory.
    squashmaple a aimé ceci.
    11 août 2023 à 10 h 13
    #11
    Grierless Sharks Fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2017
    Messages: 2,982
    Mentions "j'aime": 935
    Quoting: Juiceman
    Garland is pretty much on his way out. Just doesn’t fit well in our lineup unfortunately even though he is a very good player


    Just curious. He hasn't meshed well with Pet or Mil at C?
    11 août 2023 à 12 h 48
    #12
    Ex Nucks fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 17,615
    Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
    Quoting: goodfella
    Just curious. He hasn't meshed well with Pet or Mil at C?


    Not consistently
    11 août 2023 à 14 h 4
    #13
    Grierless Sharks Fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2017
    Messages: 2,982
    Mentions "j'aime": 935
    Quoting: Juiceman
    Not consistently


    System issue? Or does he just gotta go?
    11 août 2023 à 15 h 5
    #14
    Ex Nucks fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 17,615
    Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
    Quoting: goodfella
    System issue? Or does he just gotta go?


    Playstyle doesn't mesh well because he needs to be the primary playdriver on his line
    goodfella a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage