SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

just looking

Créé par: Bruins_Guy613
Équipe: 2023-24 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 8 août 2023
Publié: 8 août 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Lindholm, Elias (1 000 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
signs extension
CGY
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Grzelcyk, Matt
  3. McLaughlin, Marc
Détails additionnels:
jake and grz sign extensions
grzy replaces Hanafin when he's traded
2.
BOS
  1. Farinacci, John [Liste de réserve]
Détails additionnels:
signed as ufa
ARI
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2026
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $81 108 334 $4 500 000 $500 000 $2 391 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
11 250 000 $11 250 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
787 500 $787 500 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 137 500 $1 137 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 475 000 $3 475 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
775 000 $775 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
C
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 août 2023 à 16 h 15
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 988
Mentions "j'aime": 393
oof flames decline
8 août 2023 à 16 h 19
#2
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
Zero chance of Calgary accepting that trade, Conroy will get a much better offer for Elias Lindholm elsewhere.
8 août 2023 à 16 h 26
#3
jcambers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 689
Mentions "j'aime": 118
CGY declines. Lysell, DeBrusk, and a 1st Rd Pick might start the conversationthough... Lindholm is Bergeron lite and will cost a bit
8 août 2023 à 16 h 49
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,587
Mentions "j'aime": 5,457
Quoting: jcambers
CGY declines. Lysell, DeBrusk, and a 1st Rd Pick might start the conversationthough... Lindholm is Bergeron lite and will cost a bit


Debate the return, but Lindholm isn't close to Bergeron at all
8 août 2023 à 20 h 43
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,510
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: jcambers
CGY declines. Lysell, DeBrusk, and a 1st Rd Pick might start the conversationthough... Lindholm is Bergeron lite and will cost a bit


Start the conversation? That's better than what VAN got for Horvat.
Bruins_Guy613 a aimé ceci.
9 août 2023 à 1 h 42
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,919
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Quoting: ON3M4N
Start the conversation? That's better than what VAN got for Horvat.


I wouldn’t trade DeBrusk and Lysell for Lindholm. I like Elias, but I’m looking forward to see what DeBrusk does this year and I think people are sleeping on Lysell because he wore down
Bruins_Guy613 a aimé ceci.
9 août 2023 à 8 h 46
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,510
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Celtics21
I wouldn’t trade DeBrusk and Lysell for Lindholm. I like Elias, but I’m looking forward to see what DeBrusk does this year and I think people are sleeping on Lysell because he wore down


I want DeBrusk to stay long-term, but he also has to want to stay. If he tells Sweeney & Co. that he wants to go to FA, then I'd make him available in a deal. Idk if I'd say people are sleep on Lysell. I think many fans just know he's one of Boston's best trade chips and finding top 6 center's is harder than top 6 wingers. I will say that that my expectation for Lysell is to fighting for a roster spot in this camp. I'd say his competition right now is Boqvist, Greer & Brown. What works against Lysell is that he's still waiver exempt and Sweeney & Co have a history of shipping guys to Providence who don't require waivers even if they earned an NHL roster spot.
9 août 2023 à 9 h 36
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,919
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Modifié 9 août 2023 à 10 h 38
Quoting: ON3M4N
I want DeBrusk to stay long-term, but he also has to want to stay. If he tells Sweeney & Co. that he wants to go to FA, then I'd make him available in a deal..


If that’s the case, then his trade value to Calgary would be lower and you wait until the trade deadline with a contender. He’s the type of asset that should warrant a first rounder at the trade deadline with some retention.

My belief is there should be some desire to lock in contractually and if that’s the case, DeBrusk should be a very valuable asset. My assumption is he’d be as willing, if not more willing, to sign here long term as Lindholm.

Quoting: ON3M4N
I Idk if I'd say people are sleep on Lysell. I think many fans just know he's one of Boston's best trade chips and finding top 6 center's is harder than top 6 wingers. I will say that that my expectation for Lysell is to fighting for a roster spot in this camp. I'd say his competition right now is Boqvist, Greer & Brown. What works against Lysell is that he's still waiver exempt and Sweeney & Co have a history of shipping guys to Providence who don't require waivers even if they earned an NHL roster spot.


I fully anticipate that Lysell will start the year in Providence, but Sweeney won’t hesitate to expose one of the journeyman he signed for 800k or below if he starts the year like he likely will. He’s said as much in his press conferences. I’m open to trading him, but I’m not going to treat him like a thrown in when he likely will be more valuable if I wait.

I doubt Calgary gets a trade package that would be better than DeBrusk and Lysell from an upside perspective for them, but I’m very high on both players

If we are trading DeBrusk, I’d likely be offering Poitras because we will need Lysell
9 août 2023 à 11 h 4
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,510
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Celtics21
If that’s the case, then his trade value to Calgary would be lower and you wait until the trade deadline with a contender. He’s the type of asset that should warrant a first rounder at the trade deadline with some retention.

My belief is there should be some desire to lock in contractually and if that’s the case, DeBrusk should be a very valuable asset. My assumption is he’d be as willing, if not more willing, to sign here long term as Lindholm.



I fully anticipate that Lysell will start the year in Providence, but Sweeney won’t hesitate to expose one of the journeyman he signed for 800k or below if he starts the year like he likely will. He’s said as much in his press conferences. I’m open to trading him, but I’m not going to treat him like a thrown in when he likely will be more valuable if I wait.

I doubt Calgary gets a trade package that would be better than DeBrusk and Lysell from an upside perspective for them, but I’m very high on both players

If we are trading DeBrusk, I’d likely be offering Poitras because we will need Lysell


In DeBrusk I could see appeal for him to sign in CGY if he wants to be closer to home and Edmonton isn't an option for him.

I'm not moving Poitras. He projects to actually stick a center and was top 5 in OHL points last year. Boston is thin at center talent and we can't be trading it away.
9 août 2023 à 11 h 13
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 3,919
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Quoting: ON3M4N
In DeBrusk I could see appeal for him to sign in CGY if he wants to be closer to home and Edmonton isn't an option for him.

I'm not moving Poitras. He projects to actually stick a center and was top 5 in OHL points last year. Boston is thin at center talent and we can't be trading it away.


I get the positional appeal of Poitras. He projects as a 2C and we need that.

It’s why I think a Lindstrom deal seems far fetched. I’m not sure we acquire a C without a goalie being in the deal. I probably value future first a bit more than others as well.

My assumption is DeBrusk will want to stay here now that Bruce is gone. We will see, but I have a hard time giving up a two way wing with his scoring potential at his age
9 août 2023 à 11 h 37
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,510
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Celtics21
I get the positional appeal of Poitras. He projects as a 2C and we need that.

It’s why I think a Lindstrom deal seems far fetched. I’m not sure we acquire a C without a goalie being in the deal. I probably value future first a bit more than others as well.

My assumption is DeBrusk will want to stay here now that Bruce is gone. We will see, but I have a hard time giving up a two way wing with his scoring potential at his age


Again it all depends on what DeBrusk wants. If he wants to stay in Boston, great sign him to a long-term team and make him part of your new core. If he doesn't have an interest in staying then you make him available in a deal that helps your team.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage