I like it but Ullmark won't waive.

Don't think he's untouchable, but you aren't getting him in this.

Probably need to lesson the pick and take a goalie, personally I’m scared to take a bruins goalie on and drop him in Winnipeg. But glad I’m not in the decision making lol

Lol what makes you "scared to take a bruins goalie on" ??

That bruins team was so stacked and underrated, they folded in the playoffs, but just remember every goalie ever shipped to Winnipeg and none of them seemed the same, from essensa, to cheveldayov to whoever. Need a homegrown answer. Just a personal phobia lol

It’s not that Krebs is untouchable it’s that you think he is a third piece asset in a rental helly trade. Rental goalies don’t pull that value

I can see a protected 24 first and a lesser prospect. That's it. Plus we don't need retention.

Ullmark also posted a .915 and a .917 on terrible Sabres teams.

So my phobia is unfounded possibly, wasn’t saying it was a sane phobia lol.

I agree. I think I'd be ok (perhaps prefer) if it were Swayman instead!

They should (i hope) be better defensively this coming season!

Id do both of those

ZERO CHANCE the Sabres are giving that up for a
RENTAL GOALIE

And yes, he would be a “rental” for us bc we aren’t gonna sign him to the extension he wants

Not happening

That’s fair, I do think what he ultimately signs for will be much more reasonable than the current narrative. I bet 5 or 6 by 8ish. And he will be full value for it.

I really don’t think it’ll be the Sabres who sign him
We REALLY like Levi- he was the piece we “had to have” when we traded Reinhart- and we don’t wanna “block him”

Most i could see us doing is getting a goalie with 2years left on his deal, 3 at most- as a “bridge” for a couple years

A long term goalie would be shocking at this point