SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fixing PK and getting Hughes a long term partner

Créé par: Blenchers
Équipe: 2023-24 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 21 juin 2023
Publié: 21 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Canucks add 2 elite PKers in Forbort and Suter. Add a healthy Mikheyev and Peeke and you have a rock solid 1st unit.

Forbort deal helps Boston out cap wise.

Suter deal is a little higher than EH's model. Maybe it takes $3m to get him. Can also fill in as 2C in a pinch.

Columbus has too many RD but they're not going to give away a big 25 year old with solid underlying numbers for free. Podkolzin (#10 overall 2019) is a lot to give up but I could see Allvin doing this to get Hughes a long term partner finally. Podkolzin also played on a line and had chemistry with Marchenko in the KHL which I imagine would interest Columbus.

One more year of Myers and then we can go about fixing the bottom pair...
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1950 000 $
2950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
2.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de VAN
Logo de DET
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NJD
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $82 655 417 $850 000 $0 $844 583 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 juin 2023 à 2 h 25
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 9,101
Mentions "j'aime": 3,528
Nice work, seems like reasonable moves.

I would say though that CBJ fans are always mentioning that they have a ton of wingers, so maybe the Jackets wouldn't even ask for Podkolzin. Probably should bring Bear back.

Isn't Pearson's career pretty much over?
21 juin 2023 à 2 h 28
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,731
Mentions "j'aime": 9,760
Pearson is gonna be on LTIR

Would not give up on Podkolzin for Peeke
21 juin 2023 à 2 h 42
#3
Dolzhenkov Is Coming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,729
Mentions "j'aime": 5,445
Quoting: GMBL
Nice work, seems like reasonable moves.

I would say though that CBJ fans are always mentioning that they have a ton of wingers, so maybe the Jackets wouldn't even ask for Podkolzin. Probably should bring Bear back.

Isn't Pearson's career pretty much over?


If it's a silly proposal like Podkolzin for Peeke you kinda just have to take it. I'm not 100% on Texier as a long term Jacket so he'd fit in nicely on the roster with Marchenko, Voronkov, and Chinakhov if Tex decides he'd like to play elsewhere in the future.
GMBL a aimé ceci.
21 juin 2023 à 2 h 46
#4
Ktownchef
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 479
Mentions "j'aime": 197
Love the Suter signing. Maybe 1 year too long for me personally but I get it.

I wouldn't trade Podz for Peeke.

Probably going to have to give up a 3rd or 4th for Forbort even though it is a cap dump for the Bruins.
21 juin 2023 à 2 h 46
#5
Démarrer sujet
Blenchers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: GMBL
Nice work, seems like reasonable moves.

I would say though that CBJ fans are always mentioning that they have a ton of wingers, so maybe the Jackets wouldn't even ask for Podkolzin. Probably should bring Bear back.

Isn't Pearson's career pretty much over?


Nothing's been reported recently on Pearson, but everyone's acting like he's dead. Team, doctors and NHLPA will do everything they can to get him back. Also hand and not core/muscle issue, he can still skate and stay in shape. I don't think we can assume he's on LTIR this year yet.

I like Bear but the injury would give me pause. I like Peeke's size in our top 4 better and as a fit with Hughes, a trade for him wouldn't leave us enough $ for Bear without another move.

Columbus has lots of wingers I just don't see many good ones (on the roster or coming) after Gaudreau and Laine. They will want Johnson at C long term I think. Most of their top prospects are D or C other than Dumais.
GMBL a aimé ceci.
21 juin 2023 à 2 h 51
#6
Démarrer sujet
Blenchers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: dk325
If it's a silly proposal like Podkolzin for Peeke you kinda just have to take it. I'm not 100% on Texier as a long term Jacket so he'd fit in nicely on the roster with Marchenko, Voronkov, and Chinakhov if Tex decides he'd like to play elsewhere in the future.


It's steep but I really think that's the going rate for RHD + good + big + young + can skate. He's a stylistic fit with VAN plus he's cost controlled for 3 more years.

Jarmo is as shrewd as they get, I don't see him giving any of his RD away for scraps (OK maybe Gudbranson).
21 juin 2023 à 2 h 54
#7
Démarrer sujet
Blenchers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: Ktownchef
Love the Suter signing. Maybe 1 year too long for me personally but I get it.

I wouldn't trade Podz for Peeke.

Probably going to have to give up a 3rd or 4th for Forbort even though it is a cap dump for the Bruins.


Yeah I think I'd do a 4th but not a 3rd.
21 juin 2023 à 2 h 56
#8
Dolzhenkov Is Coming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,729
Mentions "j'aime": 5,445
Quoting: Blenchers
It's steep but I really think that's the going rate for RHD + good + big + young + can skate. He's a stylistic fit with VAN plus he's cost controlled for 3 more years.

Jarmo is as shrewd as they get, I don't see him giving any of his RD away for scraps (OK maybe Gudbranson).


I certainly hope he has this kinda value if he's traded. I'm just not holding onto hope that he's going to be all that sought after after the season he had.
21 juin 2023 à 3 h 1
#9
Démarrer sujet
Blenchers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 33
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: dk325
I certainly hope he has this kinda value if he's traded. I'm just not holding onto hope that he's going to be all that sought after after the season he had.


I'd rather part with Podkolzin than a future 1st.

CBJ also has to think about carving out NHL minutes for Jiricek. Imagine he would step right into that 2nd pair spot.
21 juin 2023 à 3 h 6
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,234
Mentions "j'aime": 1,086
I don't understand trading Podkolzin. If we are moving a young piece then Hoglander makes more sense.
21 juin 2023 à 3 h 16
#11
Dolzhenkov Is Coming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,729
Mentions "j'aime": 5,445
Quoting: Blenchers
I'd rather part with Podkolzin than a future 1st.

CBJ also has to think about carving out NHL minutes for Jiricek. Imagine he would step right into that 2nd pair spot.


I'm not convinced they'll trade anyone just for the sake of trading them. They can put Blankenburg in Cleveland since he's waiver exempt and then carry 8 D until they know if Jiricek is going to stick or not. If he doesn't then they could have a solid 7 on the team of Werenski, Severson, Provorov, Boqvist, Bean, Gudbranson, and Peeke with Blankenburg as the first AHL call up. If Jiricek does make the team then they can carry 8 for a while until either someone gets hurt or a team has a need for a RD mid season.
21 juin 2023 à 3 h 23
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 9,101
Mentions "j'aime": 3,528
Quoting: dk325
If it's a silly proposal like Podkolzin for Peeke you kinda just have to take it. I'm not 100% on Texier as a long term Jacket so he'd fit in nicely on the roster with Marchenko, Voronkov, and Chinakhov if Tex decides he'd like to play elsewhere in the future.


Yeah, that's true. If it's offered they would take it, but one would hope Vancouver management is asking what the price would be on a player like Peeke that is a potential surplus.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage