SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Get younger

Créé par: Henkileeto
Équipe: 2023-24 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 14 juin 2023
Publié: 14 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I think we need to have a conversation about the wild trading Kaprizov, they would in reality never do it but what would it take. in my mind i'd look at some younger pieces, who are on track to make serious impact with star potential. it would help to spread the cap through the lineup a bit more since 14 mil dead cap is a lot and ELC impact players are incredebly valueble.

i'm not saying it has to be the kings, but i do think they are one of few teams it makes sense for to do this. they have some older still important drivers of the team and if they want another cup with them and not just hope that they stay cheap with kids hopefully taking over time for some additions.

I think that Tkachuck before this season and Kaprizov would be kind of equal value, sure you get less years but still, cap, production and star power is similar. since wild have less space to take on some big deals and LA wanna add to what they got i see it like this. huberdeau would be basicly byfield+, weegar =vilardi+ some and clarke closes the gap in value.

i think 0 LA fans would agree, but remenber every living being is saying a year afterwards that panthers gigawon that trade. i think it could be similar with this one, but would also allow wild to be very good both these 14mil dead cap years.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
85 500 000 $
1900 000 $
43 900 000 $
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de VGK
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2024
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de BUF
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2025
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de TOR
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $79 264 421 $0 $4 350 000 $4 235 579 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, C
RFA - 1
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 juin 2023 à 8 h 35
#1
Snowhawk
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,483
Mentions "j'aime": 3,556
You should change the heading to say “get younger and worse”.
14 juin 2023 à 8 h 36
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,705
Mentions "j'aime": 19,796
LA can't afford that. Don't think they would do it either
14 juin 2023 à 8 h 39
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,598
Mentions "j'aime": 4,581
Cap wouldn’t work at all from LA’s point of view, aside from that Byfield and Clarke are the cornerstones of the Kings rebuild.
14 juin 2023 à 8 h 42
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 32
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: Snowhawk18
You should change the heading to say “get younger and worse”.


dont actually think it would make them that much worse, but 1st year yea most likely. sets them up nicely for future though.

Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
LA can't afford that. Don't think they would do it either


if they pay a 3rd team for cap retension they could. like 2.5mil ret for 3 years for a 1st. or trade a dump back
14 juin 2023 à 8 h 53
#5
Snowhawk
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,483
Mentions "j'aime": 3,556
Quoting: Henkileeto
dont actually think it would make them that much worse, but 1st year yea most likely. sets them up nicely for future though.



if they pay a 3rd team for cap retension they could. like 2.5mil ret for 3 years for a 1st. or trade a dump back


Vilardi is a player an interesting player but has a history of injuries. Clarke is a very good D prospect; solid offensively but needs a lot of work in his own end which is not uncommon for young d-men. Byfield in my opinion has been a significant disappointment when considering his draft slot. He is starting to look more like a 2/3 centre as opposed to a dominant #1 as initially projected.

To me the package isn’t good enough to net one of the best young NHL stars.
CoolHandL a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2023 à 9 h 4
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 32
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: Snowhawk18
Vilardi is a player an interesting player but has a history of injuries. Clarke is a very good D prospect; solid offensively but needs a lot of work in his own end which is not uncommon for young d-men. Byfield in my opinion has been a significant disappointment when considering his draft slot. He is starting to look more like a 2/3 centre as opposed to a dominant #1 as initially projected.

To me the package isn’t good enough to net one of the best young NHL stars.


what would be good enough for you to trade him? if you get to add or trade with a different team

i do agree that the package might not be enough but there is a limited amount of teams that can trade something of value that dont just make the wild rebuild.
14 juin 2023 à 9 h 17
#7
Snowhawk
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,483
Mentions "j'aime": 3,556
Quoting: Henkileeto
what would be good enough for you to trade him? if you get to add or trade with a different team

i do agree that the package might not be enough but there is a limited amount of teams that can trade something of value that dont just make the wild rebuild.


I don’t think there is any need or motivation for Minnesota to trade a 26 year old star who is just entering his prime and is under contract for another three seasons. Teams build around guys like Kaprizov they don’t trade them away unless their hand is forced.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2023 à 9 h 24
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,705
Mentions "j'aime": 19,796
Quoting: Henkileeto
dont actually think it would make them that much worse, but 1st year yea most likely. sets them up nicely for future though.



if they pay a 3rd team for cap retension they could. like 2.5mil ret for 3 years for a 1st. or trade a dump back


That team would be paying Kaprizov 8.2M over the next 3 years to not play for him. Thats really not reasonable at all
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 juin 2023 à 12 h 50
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 745
Mentions "j'aime": 136
Lol Minnesota isn't trading their franchise player for prospects & one nhl player. Lol
14 juin 2023 à 16 h 57
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 3,703
Mentions "j'aime": 1,646
Quoting: Snowhawk18
Vilardi is a player an interesting player but has a history of injuries. Clarke is a very good D prospect; solid offensively but needs a lot of work in his own end which is not uncommon for young d-men. Byfield in my opinion has been a significant disappointment when considering his draft slot. He is starting to look more like a 2/3 centre as opposed to a dominant #1 as initially projected.

To me the package isn’t good enough to net one of the best young NHL stars.

Byfield is not a significant disappointment. Yes I want him to be producing more but covid didn’t help him.
Breaking his ankle has not helped him.
Getting sick this year in the beginning has not helped him.

Each year he has worked on certain things and has gotten better. This past season he got way better at using his body.

This next season he has got to start shooting it more and I believe the goals will start coming. If the goals start coming. He’ll hit 50+ points next year at 21.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage