SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Helping the Leafs

Créé par: DirtyDangles
Équipe: 2023-24 Flyers de Philadelphie
Date de création initiale: 6 juin 2023
Publié: 6 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2900 000 $
83 500 000 $
23 000 000 $
33 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
PHI
  1. Roslovic, Jack
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Hayes, Kevin (2 142 857 $ retained)
2.
PHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
any team
ANA
  1. Deangelo, Anthony (2 500 000 $ retained)
3.
PHI
  1. Zadina, Filip
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (NYI)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
4.
PHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (SEA)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
5.
PHI
  1. Murray, Matt
  2. Robertson, Nicholas
  3. Timmins, Conor
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Murray is told he is being bought out either way so he waives his NTC
TOR
  1. Laughton, Scott
  2. Roslovic, Jack (2 000 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de PHI
Logo de NYI
Logo de SEA
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de FLA
Logo de NYR
Logo de PHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de PHI
2024
Logo de PHI
Logo de FLA
Logo de TOR
Logo de CBJ
Logo de PHI
Logo de ANA
Logo de PHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
2025
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $66 180 191 $1 187 500 $70 000 $17 319 809 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
825 000 $825 000 $ (Bonis de performance37 500 $$38K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
785 000 $785 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
5 100 000 $5 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 979 000 $3 979 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
859 167 $859 167 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 juin 2023 à 8 h 20
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 2,273
Mentions "j'aime": 699
Lmao Leafs decline
6 juin 2023 à 8 h 21
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 2,273
Mentions "j'aime": 699
Quoting: SNipeSHowInc
Lmao Leafs decline


Whoops didn’t see Roslovic retained…. Closer but still probably a no
6 juin 2023 à 8 h 21
#3
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: SNipeSHowInc
Lmao Leafs decline


Yes, I know your opinion of Laughton
python3504 et sk540 a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2023 à 8 h 36
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 1,494
Mentions "j'aime": 456
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Yes, I know your opinion of Laughton


Leafs take that all day, gives them laughton for the 2nd or 1st lw line and a 3C, and leaves them with 11.8 mill for 3RW, 4LW, and a RD preferably top 4 like Graves or Orlov
DirtyDangles a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2023 à 8 h 49
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,333
Mentions "j'aime": 2,233
too generous to the leafs, Timmins and Robertson are probably worth a 3rd each or one of them is a throw in to take murray, so you only getting a late in the round 1st and an approx 3rd for laughton and roslovic witrh 2 mil retained.

That PHI defense is pretty meh and I doubt PHI sits on 16mil in cap space
TheBigFlyera a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2023 à 8 h 52
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 1,635
Mentions "j'aime": 716
Quoting: Hammerwise
too generous to the leafs, Timmins and Robertson are probably worth a 3rd each or one of them is a throw in to take murray, so you only getting a late in the round 1st and an approx 3rd for laughton and roslovic witrh 2 mil retained.

That PHI defense is pretty meh and I doubt PHI sits on 16mil in cap space


Totally agree this is way too generous for the Leafs idc what the homer says that Laughton is worth nothing and Murray can be bought out, the guys says it on every post. Both the prospects are worth 3rds at best and Murray would take a 1st to move. So we are getting Laughton for two thirds basically and retaining on Roslovic, I don’t like that it feels too light to me
6 juin 2023 à 8 h 52
#7
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: Hammerwise
too generous to the leafs, Timmins and Robertson are probably worth a 3rd each or one of them is a throw in to take murray, so you only getting a late in the round 1st and an approx 3rd for laughton and roslovic witrh 2 mil retained.

That PHI defense is pretty meh and I doubt PHI sits on 16mil in cap space


I'm not looking for Timmins to be a stud. If he can be a solid 2nd pair D man that's fine with me. Who knows, maybe he and Sanheim gel. Our D is going to be a mess as long as Ristolainen and Sanheim suck.

As for Robertson, we need some LW depth because we have NONE! The kid is 21 and has potential.
sk540 et Hammerwise a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2023 à 9 h 5
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 5,588
Mentions "j'aime": 3,001
Detroit declines. We traded Bertuzzi for a 1st and a 4th. We're not paying twice as much for a replacement for him.
6 juin 2023 à 9 h 9
#9
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: Billy12Bob
Detroit declines. We traded Bertuzzi for a 1st and a 4th. We're not paying twice as much for a replacement for him.


A team paid that for 2 months of Bertuzzi, you get 2 years at min of TK.
sk540 et TheBigFlyera a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2023 à 9 h 12
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,882
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: Hammerwise
too generous to the leafs, Timmins and Robertson are probably worth a 3rd each or one of them is a throw in to take murray, so you only getting a late in the round 1st and an approx 3rd for laughton and roslovic witrh 2 mil retained.

That PHI defense is pretty meh and I doubt PHI sits on 16mil in cap space


I would love for them to sit on that space and be a player for someone in the 24 off season - IF, they take another step forward next year AND their 1st round pick from '23 is a lock to be on the NHL squad. I see Foerster and Attard as guys who can certainly take the leap to be every day NHLers, and good ones at that. If Tippett, York, Frost, Cates can all reach another level and Coots comes back and is the player he used to be, or even 90%, I think people can see that this rebuild could only be a season.

Very optimistic but still, one can dream.
6 juin 2023 à 9 h 13
#11
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,073
Mentions "j'aime": 3,511
Quoting: TheBigFlyera
Totally agree this is way too generous for the Leafs idc what the homer says that Laughton is worth nothing and Murray can be bought out, the guys says it on every post. Both the prospects are worth 3rds at best and Murray would take a 1st to move. So we are getting Laughton for two thirds basically and retaining on Roslovic, I don’t like that it feels too light to me


Funny you call him a homer while also saying it takes 1st to move Murray.
6 juin 2023 à 9 h 15
#12
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: sk540
I would love for them to sit on that space and be a player for someone in the 24 off season - IF, they take another step forward next year AND their 1st round pick from '23 is a lock to be on the NHL squad. I see Foerster and Attard as guys who can certainly take the leap to be every day NHLers, and good ones at that. If Tippett, York, Frost, Cates can all reach another level and Coots comes back and is the player he used to be, or even 90%, I think people can see that this rebuild could only be a season.

Very optimistic but still, one can dream.


100% agree.

Then we draft say a Benson in this draft and maybe top RD next year and your year 3 (if this offseason is year 1) looks like this...

Farabee/Coots/Tippett
Frost/Gauthier/Foerster
Robertson/Cates/Zadina or Brink

York/2024 RD Draftee
Sanheim/Timmins
Andrae/Attard

We aren't far off.
sk540 et TheBigFlyera a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2023 à 9 h 17
#13
We have the passion
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 408
Mentions "j'aime": 96
Leafs accept
6 juin 2023 à 9 h 18
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,882
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: DirtyDangles
100% agree.

Then we draft say a Benson in this draft and maybe top RD next year and your year 3 (if this offseason is year 1) looks like this...

Farabee/Coots/Tippett
Frost/Gauthier/Foerster
Robertson/Cates/Zadina or Brink

York/2024 RD Draftee
Sanheim/Timmins
Andrae/Attard

We aren't far off.


Agreed. It's funny how majority of these players were drafted by the two worst GM's (historically) in Flyers history. If they pan out, sort of like an Ed Wade situation with Howard, Hamels, Utley, etc. Remains to be seen if these guys get to that level, but the above lines look pretty solid to me.

And then, with all that cap space, you can start supplementing your roster with an elite talent in free agency and some other glue guys. I even think this could be the lineup in year 2 also, depending on the performance this year of course.
DirtyDangles et TheBigFlyera a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2023 à 9 h 20
#15
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 1,635
Mentions "j'aime": 716
Quoting: Ritzy
Funny you call him a homer while also saying it takes 1st to move Murray.


It does. That’s not being a Homer. It will take a 1st to move Murray’s contract if you don’t buy him out and if anyone thinks otherwise they are kidding themselves.
6 juin 2023 à 9 h 20
#16
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: sk540
Agreed. It's funny how majority of these players were drafted by the two worst GM's (historically) in Flyers history. If they pan out, sort of like an Ed Wade situation with Howard, Hamels, Utley, etc. Remains to be seen if these guys get to that level, but the above lines look pretty solid to me.

And then, with all that cap space, you can start supplementing your roster with an elite talent in free agency and some other glue guys. I even think this could be the lineup in year 2 also, depending on the performance this year of course.


I even forgot to put Benson in that lineup..oops!

So then it Could be Frost/Benson/Robertson at LW and we can move Farabee if he doesn't take a step soon.
sk540 a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2023 à 9 h 47
#17
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,682
Mentions "j'aime": 22,753
Can't see any team wanton give up a 1st and 2nd for Provorov, they can just spend 6.75m on UFA for two years. Konecky is kinda in the same position, teams can spend 5.5m on UFA...maybe not as good as Konecky but keep their picks.
6 juin 2023 à 10 h 9
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 734
Mentions "j'aime": 577
I'm not sure how other Wings fans feel, but I'd honestly rather we do a deal like this for TK or Keller than the DeBrincat trades that show up every day for similar costs
DirtyDangles a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2023 à 10 h 54
#19
See you space cowboy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 2,065
Mentions "j'aime": 1,155
Helping the Leafs? Et tu Dangles?

All nerdy jokes aside this is pretty solid.
DirtyDangles a aimé ceci.
6 juin 2023 à 11 h 3
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,333
Mentions "j'aime": 2,233
Quoting: DirtyDangles
I'm not looking for Timmins to be a stud. If he can be a solid 2nd pair D man that's fine with me. Who knows, maybe he and Sanheim gel. Our D is going to be a mess as long as Ristolainen and Sanheim suck.

As for Robertson, we need some LW depth because we have NONE! The kid is 21 and has potential.


Agree somewhat, problem is timmins has been judged by 2 (and maybe 3 if TOR move him) teams as too weak defensively, and while he could still be something, second pairing is too much of a stretch, and Attard is probably almost as good an option. Id like to say PHI lacks high end talent, (and health), but foerster, tippett, frost, farabee, koneckny, and a healthy Couturier and Atkinson is a pretty good top 6, but i dont see a late 1st, timmins, robertson as good bets for top end.

As for Robertson, he sure has some talent, but his size and fragility is a major concern and hes been a non factor offensively in the nhl, which is all he brings. Just not sure either has enough value for PHI to take those long shots as valauble enough to take murray (whos buy out is not good in 2024-25) and lose laughton, 2mil in cap space and roslovic. The avenues for toronto in regards to murray are very limited, and Id say a 3rd in 2023 or even a late round 2nd is probably his dumping value, but leafs dont have either. They got timmins for a song and robertson's value after 3 pro seasons is less than his draft position (late 2nd) at best. (Never mind that TOR shouldnt be moving any youth, misfit toys or not)

Ultimately the leafs are giving up a major headache, a late in the round 1st, and two sinking prospects for a guy who brings more than pts in every aspect (and even then on a team that couldnt score he put up 40+ pts). Laughton alone gets almost all of that toronto package, never mind roslovic with retention.

Its just too much of a favour to TOR, and one that doesn;t benefit PHI much, just more of what they have: alot of youngish middle 6, bottom 3 youth. Brink, Attard, Foertser, Zamula, Andrae are already in system and probably better chances than robertson or timmins
6 juin 2023 à 11 h 11
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,333
Mentions "j'aime": 2,233
Quoting: sk540
I would love for them to sit on that space and be a player for someone in the 24 off season - IF, they take another step forward next year AND their 1st round pick from '23 is a lock to be on the NHL squad. I see Foerster and Attard as guys who can certainly take the leap to be every day NHLers, and good ones at that. If Tippett, York, Frost, Cates can all reach another level and Coots comes back and is the player he used to be, or even 90%, I think people can see that this rebuild could only be a season.

Very optimistic but still, one can dream.


Agree, I think they lack an internal answer at RD and some of that cap space could address it. Attard should get that 3 RD this year, but Ristolinen is a solid 2 RD, which leaves UFA to be DeAngelo as the 1 RD. I'd look to move him, and theres lots of good RD options in UFA this year (Severson, Dumba, Klingberg, etc...). Between Provorov, Sanheim, York, Seeler, Zamula, and Andrae LD is looking good, and maybe a move is there.

Defense is more about pairings, and Provorov (since Niskanen left) could have a rebound with a solid partner (Severson or Dumba), and Sanheim had his best year with Risto, but York is too good for 3rd pairing, or go Provorov-York, Sanheim-Risto, Solid Vet/Seeler-Attard, Zamula/Seeler as 7th is a young defense that could be good, and Provorov with 1 yr left (and with retention maybe) gets a good package at 24-25 TDL if he doesnt fully rebound. But ultimately, Sanheim is getting the big payday and has never/is not a first pairing guy.
6 juin 2023 à 11 h 25
#22
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: Hammerwise
Agree, I think they lack an internal answer at RD and some of that cap space could address it. Attard should get that 3 RD this year, but Ristolinen is a solid 2 RD, which leaves UFA to be DeAngelo as the 1 RD. I'd look to move him, and theres lots of good RD options in UFA this year (Severson, Dumba, Klingberg, etc...). Between Provorov, Sanheim, York, Seeler, Zamula, and Andrae LD is looking good, and maybe a move is there.

Defense is more about pairings, and Provorov (since Niskanen left) could have a rebound with a solid partner (Severson or Dumba), and Sanheim had his best year with Risto, but York is too good for 3rd pairing, or go Provorov-York, Sanheim-Risto, Solid Vet/Seeler-Attard, Zamula/Seeler as 7th is a young defense that could be good, and Provorov with 1 yr left (and with retention maybe) gets a good package at 24-25 TDL if he doesnt fully rebound. But ultimately, Sanheim is getting the big payday and has never/is not a first pairing guy.


None of those D men you mentioned are top pairing D men, imo, and don't fit the timeline
Hammerwise a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage