SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hmmm

Créé par: VanIsle73
Équipe: 2023-24 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 5 juin 2023
Publié: 5 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
53 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
45 000 000 $
44 350 000 $
26 000 000 $
24 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Colton, Ross [Droits de RFA]
TBL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
2.
3.
VAN
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2025 (WSH)
4.
VAN
  1. Hållander, Filip [Droits de RFA]
5.
VAN
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (PHI)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
Logo de VAN
Logo de DET
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de PHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de NJD
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de WSH
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $76 421 250 $850 000 $1 700 000 $7 078 750 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $
C
RFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
4 350 000 $4 350 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 juin 2023 à 1 h 44
#1
Flyers Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 186
Mentions "j'aime": 71
Value for Boeser is fine but the Flyers have no reason to acquire him. Boeser doesn't fit into a rebuilder, a playoff team in need of a scoring winger would make more sense. Also, is Beauvillier's value really that low? I haven't paid too much attention to him since the Isles made those deep playoff runs, but I feel that he's a solid middle six scoring option.
TheBigFlyera a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2023 à 1 h 56
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 622
Mentions "j'aime": 235
No way Miller gets the Canucks Sillinger
5 juin 2023 à 1 h 57
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,575
Mentions "j'aime": 566
Tampa declines. No interest in moving Colton for a 2nd round pick.
Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2023 à 2 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 3,621
Mentions "j'aime": 1,319
Canucks decline so quickly on that Miller deal. Sillinger is a fringe NHLer.

Canucks also decline the Beauvillier deal.
5 juin 2023 à 2 h 57
#5
CapEvasionEnthusiast
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 796
Mentions "j'aime": 462
TB probably says no on the Colton deal. I also don't really think he's a guy Vancouver needs or fits that well?
Brisebois would want a roster impact player or two instead of a pick but I'd be surprised if he went that route or got one in a trade with a roster player
Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2023 à 5 h 50
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,850
Mentions "j'aime": 2,579
You have a better chance struck by Lightning 10x's and surviving than of TB trading Colton for that steaming 💩 offer.
5 juin 2023 à 8 h 42
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2023
Messages: 1,635
Mentions "j'aime": 716
Quoting: flyersfan412
Value for Boeser is fine but the Flyers have no reason to acquire him. Boeser doesn't fit into a rebuilder, a playoff team in need of a scoring winger would make more sense. Also, is Beauvillier's value really that low? I haven't paid too much attention to him since the Isles made those deep playoff runs, but I feel that he's a solid middle six scoring option.


Can just retain 50% on BB and flip him for way more than a 3rd
flyersfan412 a aimé ceci.
5 juin 2023 à 9 h 1
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,311
Mentions "j'aime": 3,042
Quoting: Mediumyeet
Canucks decline so quickly on that Miller deal. Sillinger is a fringe NHLer.

Canucks also decline the Beauvillier deal.


Sillinger will be fine. He will probably never be a huge point producer but he can definitely develop into a good two way 2C. Miller just doesn’t fit the jackets timeline
5 juin 2023 à 9 h 31
#9
Casual Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 738
Mentions "j'aime": 207
Gonna cost way more than that to dump Beauvelier.
5 juin 2023 à 15 h 10
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 3,621
Mentions "j'aime": 1,319
Quoting: SK101
Sillinger will be fine. He will probably never be a huge point producer but he can definitely develop into a good two way 2C. Miller just doesn’t fit the jackets timeline


He might develop into a 2C eventually but as of right now that looks like the higher end of his projection. Canucks aren't giving up a guy that has averaged over a point per game the past 4 seasons for a single unproven player/prospect.
5 juin 2023 à 15 h 12
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,311
Mentions "j'aime": 3,042
Quoting: Mediumyeet
He might develop into a 2C eventually but as of right now that looks like the higher end of his projection. Canucks aren't giving up a guy that has averaged over a point per game the past 4 seasons for a single unproven player/prospect.


Send him somewhere else then. Jackets are still rebuilding and his contract is only going to get worse. by the time they are ready to compete in a few years that contract will be an anchor
5 juin 2023 à 15 h 13
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 3,621
Mentions "j'aime": 1,319
Quoting: SK101
Send him somewhere else then. Jackets are still rebuilding and his contract is only going to get worse.


They will probably keep him. I didn't send him to CBJ here. I'm just saying that's not remotely close to enticing Van to move him. Add in the king's 1st rounder and you might get them listening.
5 juin 2023 à 15 h 23
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,311
Mentions "j'aime": 3,042
Quoting: Mediumyeet
They will probably keep him. I didn't send him to CBJ here. I'm just saying that's not remotely close to enticing Van to move him. Add in the king's 1st rounder and you might get them listening.


I mean he doesn’t fit their timeline. I don’t think they would take him for free right now. That contract would prevent them being able to sign their top young players in the future. For that price I would rather go after lindholm.
5 juin 2023 à 15 h 31
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 3,621
Mentions "j'aime": 1,319
Quoting: SK101
I mean he doesn’t fit their timeline. I don’t think they would take him for free right now. That contract would prevent them being able to sign their top young players in the future. For that price I would rather go after lindholm.


I think CBJ is going to try to be good as soon as this upcoming season. They vastly underperformed this year and we're hammered with injuries particularly to werenski. The prospects they already have plus the addition of 3OA. I think management thinks it's go time now in CBJ. We will see though.
5 juin 2023 à 15 h 35
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 3,311
Mentions "j'aime": 3,042
Quoting: Mediumyeet
I think CBJ is going to try to be good as soon as this upcoming season. They vastly underperformed this year and we're hammered with injuries particularly to werenski. The prospects they already have plus the addition of 3OA. I think management thinks it's go time now in CBJ. We will see though.


Yeah they will make improvements at center and LD for sure but not at the expense of players like sillinger or for older players with long contracts. I think they trade for Kevin Hayes as a stopgap center and then make a move for a top 4 LD either in FA or through trade until their prospects are ready for full time duty
Mediumyeet a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage