SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

NJD 23-24

Créé par: NJDevils1317
Équipe: 2023-24 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 5 mai 2023
Publié: 3 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Accurate/Prorated
LTIR activée: Non
Journées à la saison: 185
Journées restantes: 185
Saison restante: 100%
Masse salariale projetée avant les jours restants Info-bulle : 49 217 500 $
Description
We could go back and forth on $100k here or there, but overall this is what I expect the roster to be. I just moved out Boqvist and Walsh and put them below their positions as I expect them to start in the blank spots, but those two areas to be where the Devils look to make improvements.

I'd rather start with Boqvist and Walsh in those spots and accumulate a ton of cap room where competitive teams likely won't have as much to be able to eat entire contracts of guys coming on in December, January, February etc.

This is still a good enough team to compete for the division with a 3C or 3RD (and heck, one of those two could be better than I expected there...we struggled to find a 3C all year last year, but Severson, even for all his haters, will be tougher to replace).

The BIG thing is, the Devils are in no reason to rush to acquire guys, especially overpaying for expiring deals. Could get re-signs? Sure...but most UFAs aren't worth it after a certain point. This should be a team built on guys IN there prime or entering it...not leaving it.

The Devils have their 3RD of the future in Nemec, so not looking for a guy with term at 3RD unless it is cheap enough to become the 7th D next year an bump Brendan Smith out.

I just threw in a guy like Pius Suter as a LW/C extra player that didn't seem to fit into DET's plans as he would come to a place he could fight for the 3C spot, and have plenty of countrymen to be happy with.

While Haula could be 3C, for whatever reason, Jack Hughes is better with Haula next to him. Haula taking the faceoffs there and then letting Jack go wild after just seems to work.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 850 000 $
2975 000 $
2975 000 $
77 750 000 $
31 750 000 $
78 250 000 $
2800 000 $
22 100 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
1950 000 $
Transactions
NJD
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (OTT)
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de NJD
Logo de CHI
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2024
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de OTT
Logo de NJD
Logo de COL
Logo de NJD
2025
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $77 275 000 $422 500 $2 232 500 $6 225 000 $
Masse salariale proratée

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
975 000 $975 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
975 000 $975 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
950 000 $950 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 juin 2023 à 9 h 5
#1
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,725
Mentions "j'aime": 9,889
I hope the Hawks don't do this. We're not in a position to trade picks away.
Hawksguy81 et Garak a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2023 à 9 h 18
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 4,470
Mentions "j'aime": 2,283
Quoting: exo2769
I hope the Hawks don't do this. We're not in a position to trade picks away.


Chicago has 6 1sts and 8 2nds in the next three years, but their roster is currently BRUTAL and void of talent. Those are the picks you really need to use to draft and build, but you need something on the ice around Bedard. Sharangovich can be a nice player, but he can't keep up with a truly top scoring team. He needs a team where he can be allowed to grow through mistakes. Chicago could go out and sign guys, they have cap room, but more likely to make bad mistakes in free agency than a player you could acquire that just needs more room to grow. I'm not saying Sharangovich is 1st line material, but with this year's free agent class being so bad, you may be able to piece together something to make the top 6 not so dreadful.
3 juin 2023 à 9 h 23
#3
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,725
Mentions "j'aime": 9,889
Quoting: NJDevils1317
Chicago has 6 1sts and 8 2nds in the next three years, but their roster is currently BRUTAL and void of talent. Those are the picks you really need to use to draft and build, but you need something on the ice around Bedard. Sharangovich can be a nice player, but he can't keep up with a truly top scoring team. He needs a team where he can be allowed to grow through mistakes. Chicago could go out and sign guys, they have cap room, but more likely to make bad mistakes in free agency than a player you could acquire that just needs more room to grow. I'm not saying Sharangovich is 1st line material, but with this year's free agent class being so bad, you may be able to piece together something to make the top 6 not so dreadful.


I'd just prefer to use that draft capital to move up in the draft, plus how much better is Sharangovich over the ~15 cap dumps other teams are looking to shed? That's where tbe Hawks should be. Taking on NHL players from cap constrained teams and acquiring picks vs losing them.
Hawksguy81 et Garak a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2023 à 9 h 57
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 4,470
Mentions "j'aime": 2,283
Quoting: exo2769
I'd just prefer to use that draft capital to move up in the draft, plus how much better is Sharangovich over the ~15 cap dumps other teams are looking to shed? That's where tbe Hawks should be. Taking on NHL players from cap constrained teams and acquiring picks vs losing them.


That's fair, but the issue with the cap dump guys (Goodrow from NYR, Bailey from NYI, etc) is you establish so much of the roster to be a place where talent goes to die. Look at ARI as they build nothing around Keller and former Chychrun. While sure, you can take on a few guys, but doesn't mean that should be the only thing making up your roster.

To the question of, how much better is Sharangovich than any of them, I'd take that on a case by case basis, but you could at least look at Sharangovich is someone you could develop than only taking on to be bad and be the dumping ground.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2023 à 9 h 59
#5
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,725
Mentions "j'aime": 9,889
Quoting: NJDevils1317
That's fair, but the issue with the cap dump guys (Goodrow from NYR, Bailey from NYI, etc) is you establish so much of the roster to be a place where talent goes to die. Look at ARI as they build nothing around Keller and former Chychrun. While sure, you can take on a few guys, but doesn't mean that should be the only thing making up your roster.

To the question of, how much better is Sharangovich than any of them, I'd take that on a case by case basis, but you could at least look at Sharangovich is someone you could develop than only taking on to be bad and be the dumping ground.


Very fair. I don't consider AZ a good comp to CHI. CHI will spend to the cap ceiling when appropriate. AZ doesn't tend to do that.
Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2023 à 10 h 7
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 4,470
Mentions "j'aime": 2,283
Quoting: exo2769
Very fair. I don't consider AZ a good comp to CHI. CHI will spend to the cap ceiling when appropriate. AZ doesn't tend to do that.


Yea, my comparison was more than Arizona would only spend so much on cap dumps (usually guys where their salary was less than the cap hit, or LTIR through insurance) but Chicago could supercharge that and get some really bad contracts like Binnington or Jack Campbell.
3 juin 2023 à 10 h 11
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,583
Mentions "j'aime": 18,488
Quoting: exo2769
I'd just prefer to use that draft capital to move up in the draft, plus how much better is Sharangovich over the ~15 cap dumps other teams are looking to shed? That's where tbe Hawks should be. Taking on NHL players from cap constrained teams and acquiring picks vs losing them.


I think taking cap dumps is a bad idea, especially when you have Bedard coming in. Want to direction to be only pointing up starting in 2023-24.

In Chicago’s last rebuild through the late 2000’s, they didn’t take cap dumps. They built slowly through draft. Colorado’s in late 2010’s, no dumps. Or Tampa in early Yzerman years. New Jersey stunk for a long time, hasn’t take any bad cap since 2016. The incentives are enticing, but it’s hard on building a positive culture. I feel like teams who avoid these deals are ultimately better off.
exo2769 et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2023 à 10 h 20
#8
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,725
Mentions "j'aime": 9,889
Quoting: NHLfan10506
I think taking cap dumps is a bad idea, especially when you have Bedard coming in. Want to direction to be only pointing up starting in 2023-24.

In Chicago’s last rebuild through the late 2000’s, they didn’t take cap dumps. They built slowly through draft. Colorado’s in late 2010’s, no dumps. Or Tampa in early Yzerman years. New Jersey stunk for a long time, hasn’t take any bad cap since 2016. The incentives are enticing, but it’s hard on building a positive culture. I feel like teams who avoid these deals are ultimately better off.


All good thoughts. Bedard certainly throws a nice wrinkle into things for sure. The dumps SHould get picks with them to mimic the Yzerman model. I also personally believe this year offers a unique opportunity for "dumps". Garland isn't bad a hockey. He just didn't gel in PIT and gets paid too much. There are a bunch of guys like that.
Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2023 à 10 h 50
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,583
Mentions "j'aime": 18,488
Quoting: exo2769
All good thoughts. Bedard certainly throws a nice wrinkle into things for sure. The dumps SHould get picks with them to mimic the Yzerman model. I also personally believe this year offers a unique opportunity for "dumps". Garland isn't bad a hockey. He just didn't gel in PIT and gets paid too much. There are a bunch of guys like that.


Yzerman didn’t really rely on pick volume…he just hit on more picks than most and traded for undervalued guys.

Take cap…but would payments for dead weight.
3 juin 2023 à 14 h 4
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,966
Mentions "j'aime": 10,783
I would rather put Reichel, Kurashev, Johnson, or Raddysh on Bedards wing than Sharangovich, let alone spending two 3rd round picks on him. We have talent in CHI and on it's way over the next few years, and there are plenty of free agents that will be willing to sign with CHI. I can name a ton of reasons why, too. Domi brought his career back from the dead in CHI and there are many players looking for opportunities to do the same, there is lots of room for growth and not much pressure while the rebuild is in its early stages, Bedard is on his way along with a lot of other exciting young players, Richardson is widely known as someone guys like to play for, it's an original 6 team in one of the greatest cities in the world, they boast some of the best practice facilities in the league, I could go on and on. There is no reason for CHI to buy on any players, especially not at a price like this.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage