Quoting: dopplsan
CBJ pass. Don't want that Strome contract.
Quoting: dopplsan
Peeke's value to CBJ is probably higher than what the market says. Frankly, it'd probably be a 1st+-type ask. A quality 2LD+ with term would also work (as a Gavvy replacement).
Quoting: Ajp_18
Jarmo loves Peeke, I highly doubt he gets traded at this offseason unless Boqvist and Blankenburg so show that they can stay healthy for an 82 game season. Which they haven’t done.
My guess is that it would take at least a 2nd+ for jarmo to move Peeke right now, that being said Peeke would be so much better on the 3rd pair, he really isn’t a top pair defenseman yet.
Quoting: squashmaple
I wanted a Strome last offseason. I don’t care for Peeke. I like both parts of the deal, but not the deal itself if that makes sense. I feel like a team closer to contention in need of a defensive RD like Buffalo or Vancouver would give up more a better package for Columbus than Ryan Strome, and Anaheim probably could do the same for Strome.
This trade was discussed a little in this AGCM last night:
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4093307
I would do the Peeke for Strome trade because I think it is a better option than the rumored Hayes trade with Philly.
Yes, I know we have a good chance at drafting a Center in the 1st round this year that may make this moot.
Worst case, Strome is probably an upgrade over Roslovic and possibly Jenner at Center and we can evaluate the options and figure out who stays, who goes and who gets moved to wing.