SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Peeke Blinders

Créé par: Lactic_Flaccid
Équipe: 2023-24 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 6 avr. 2023
Publié: 6 avr. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I saw one Columbus fan say they would do Peeke for Strome, so Im running with it

Bringing in two big shutdown defenseman should bring our record breaking 40 shots against average down a bit for a developing Dostal and an aging Gibson

Bring in Boeser to replace Strome as our top 6 RW. Bigger cap hit but shorter term so gives the rebuild some more flexibility without compromising veteran presence.

Not sure what exactly the price is for Edmundson
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
3950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 100 000 $
12 500 000 $
21 125 000 $
23 300 000 $
3975 000 $
77 142 857 $
87 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 400 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Carlsson, Leo
3950 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
VAN
  1. Silfverberg, Jakob (2 625 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (MIN)
3.
ANA
  1. Edmundson, Joel
Détails additionnels:
Very big IF he would waive his NTC
MTL
  1. Vaakanainen, Urho
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de COL
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2025
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de MIN
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $65 938 274 $0 $2 500 000 $16 561 726 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Carlsson, Leo
950 000 $950 000 $
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
975 000 $975 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
425 000 $425 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 300 000 $3 300 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 avr. 2023 à 14 h 26
#1
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,761
Mentions "j'aime": 4,813
CBJ pass. Don't want that Strome contract.
Ajp_18 a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2023 à 14 h 30
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,734
Mentions "j'aime": 1,196
Canucks pass.Dont need any more wingers.IMHO.
BenningTruther a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2023 à 14 h 37
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 164
Mentions "j'aime": 71
Quoting: dopplsan
CBJ pass. Don't want that Strome contract.


What would be your ask for him?
6 avr. 2023 à 14 h 42
#4
Le patriote
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 6,778
Mentions "j'aime": 1,504
Habs gladly accept that deal and offer a poutine order of your choice!
6 avr. 2023 à 14 h 59
#5
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,761
Mentions "j'aime": 4,813
Quoting: TrevorsZebras
What would be your ask for him?


Peeke's value to CBJ is probably higher than what the market says. Frankly, it'd probably be a 1st+-type ask. A quality 2LD+ with term would also work (as a Gavvy replacement).
Ajp_18 a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2023 à 15 h 2
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 164
Mentions "j'aime": 71
Quoting: dopplsan
Peeke's value to CBJ is probably higher than what the market says. Frankly, it'd probably be a 1st+-type ask. A quality 2LD+ with term would also work (as a Gavvy replacement).


Well considering Anaheim is also in the market for a 2LHD, and not willing to part with a 1st, we are probably not the destination. But at a lowered price, he is an attractive option to this team
dopplsan a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2023 à 15 h 6
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,864
Mentions "j'aime": 6,453
Quoting: TrevorsZebras
What would be your ask for him?


Jarmo loves Peeke, I highly doubt he gets traded at this offseason unless Boqvist and Blankenburg so show that they can stay healthy for an 82 game season. Which they haven’t done.

My guess is that it would take at least a 2nd+ for jarmo to move Peeke right now, that being said Peeke would be so much better on the 3rd pair, he really isn’t a top pair defenseman yet.
Lactic_Flaccid et dopplsan a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2023 à 15 h 44
#8
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 11,009
Mentions "j'aime": 7,820
Quoting: dopplsan
Peeke's value to CBJ is probably higher than what the market says. Frankly, it'd probably be a 1st+-type ask. A quality 2LD+ with term would also work (as a Gavvy replacement).


What about Jackson LaCombe? One of our highly routes LHD youngins fresh out of NCAA. May be able to add a mid round pick to further balance.

I think Strome would perform very well with Jonny Hockey and Laine, he's shown to produce well with elite wing talent where he can play a simpler game (win the faceoff, stand in front of the net).
6 avr. 2023 à 16 h 2
#9
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,615
Mentions "j'aime": 5,071
I wanted a Strome last offseason. I don’t care for Peeke. I like both parts of the deal, but not the deal itself if that makes sense. I feel like a team closer to contention in need of a defensive RD like Buffalo or Vancouver would give up more a better package for Columbus than Ryan Strome, and Anaheim probably could do the same for Strome.
dopplsan a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2023 à 17 h 30
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 388
Mentions "j'aime": 228
Quoting: dopplsan
CBJ pass. Don't want that Strome contract.


Quoting: dopplsan
Peeke's value to CBJ is probably higher than what the market says. Frankly, it'd probably be a 1st+-type ask. A quality 2LD+ with term would also work (as a Gavvy replacement).


Quoting: Ajp_18
Jarmo loves Peeke, I highly doubt he gets traded at this offseason unless Boqvist and Blankenburg so show that they can stay healthy for an 82 game season. Which they haven’t done.

My guess is that it would take at least a 2nd+ for jarmo to move Peeke right now, that being said Peeke would be so much better on the 3rd pair, he really isn’t a top pair defenseman yet.


Quoting: squashmaple
I wanted a Strome last offseason. I don’t care for Peeke. I like both parts of the deal, but not the deal itself if that makes sense. I feel like a team closer to contention in need of a defensive RD like Buffalo or Vancouver would give up more a better package for Columbus than Ryan Strome, and Anaheim probably could do the same for Strome.


This trade was discussed a little in this AGCM last night:
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4093307

I would do the Peeke for Strome trade because I think it is a better option than the rumored Hayes trade with Philly.
Yes, I know we have a good chance at drafting a Center in the 1st round this year that may make this moot.
Worst case, Strome is probably an upgrade over Roslovic and possibly Jenner at Center and we can evaluate the options and figure out who stays, who goes and who gets moved to wing.
6 avr. 2023 à 18 h 6
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 9,864
Mentions "j'aime": 6,453
Quoting: CBJ_Bob
This trade was discussed a little in this AGCM last night:
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4093307

I would do the Peeke for Strome trade because I think it is a better option than the rumored Hayes trade with Philly.
Yes, I know we have a good chance at drafting a Center in the 1st round this year that may make this moot.
Worst case, Strome is probably an upgrade over Roslovic and possibly Jenner at Center and we can evaluate the options and figure out who stays, who goes and who gets moved to wing.


I don’t like either option tbh. Neither contract seems worth it. Both players will be 34-35 when their contracts are up and to me that screams bad end of the contract. I’d say Hayes is the better player but he would also cost more.

I’d rather trade Boqvist if we are trading anyone because at least Peeke can stay healthy and is a decent enough 3rd pair RHD where as Boqvist is constantly injured and really only does anything on the PP where he will lose his ice time to a healthy Werenski.
dopplsan a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2023 à 19 h 36
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 164
Mentions "j'aime": 71
Quoting: squashmaple
I wanted a Strome last offseason. I don’t care for Peeke. I like both parts of the deal, but not the deal itself if that makes sense. I feel like a team closer to contention in need of a defensive RD like Buffalo or Vancouver would give up more a better package for Columbus than Ryan Strome, and Anaheim probably could do the same for Strome.


That makes sense, honestly. I am sure if a contending team needs a 3rd pairing guy to fill out the roster, they may offer more. I think Anaheim front office is higher on Strome than myself, but I would not mind to see him go. I would even consider throwing in a b level prospect but that is likely all Anaheim can afford to send over.
Quoting: CBJ_Bob
This trade was discussed a little in this AGCM last night:
https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4093307

I would do the Peeke for Strome trade because I think it is a better option than the rumored Hayes trade with Philly.
Yes, I know we have a good chance at drafting a Center in the 1st round this year that may make this moot.
Worst case, Strome is probably an upgrade over Roslovic and possibly Jenner at Center and we can evaluate the options and figure out who stays, who goes and who gets moved to wing.


Strome has played a lot of wing this year and in my opinion actually looked a little better as he hasnt been fantastic defensively
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage