SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tearing it down

Créé par: DirtyDangles
Équipe: 2023-24 Flyers de Philadelphie
Date de création initiale: 14 mars 2023
Publié: 14 mars 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Take Michkov with the Flyers 1st and 1 of Barlow, Yager or top D man available.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
12 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
33 250 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
2900 000 $
Transactions
1.
PHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (LAK)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Hayes, Kevin (2 642 857 $ retained)
2.
PHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (ANA)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
Any Team
ANA
  1. Deangelo, Anthony (2 500 000 $ retained)
3.
PHI
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (CAR)
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (PHI)
4.
PHI
  1. Määttä, Olli
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (DET)
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de PHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de CAR
Logo de DET
Logo de FLA
Logo de NYR
Logo de ANA
Logo de PHI
Logo de EDM
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de PHI
2024
Logo de PHI
Logo de FLA
Logo de CAR
Logo de BOS
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de ANA
Logo de PHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
2025
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $72 196 024 $1 187 500 $495 000 $11 303 976 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
825 000 $825 000 $ (Bonis de performance37 500 $$38K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
785 000 $785 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 979 000 $3 979 000 $
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
5 100 000 $5 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
859 167 $859 167 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
900 000 $900 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 mars 2023 à 8 h 49
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,679
Mentions "j'aime": 2,340
Detroit declines. One more year of double the price Provorov and a fringe NHL back up doesn’t get you a top 15 pick +
aedoran a aimé ceci.
14 mars 2023 à 8 h 50
#2
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: CoachCoach
Detroit declines. One more year of double the price Provorov and a fringe NHL back up doesn’t get you a top 15 pick +


The thought would be to re-sign Provorov
14 mars 2023 à 9 h 7
#3
Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 352
Mentions "j'aime": 89
Quoting: DirtyDangles
The thought would be to re-sign Provorov


Still too expensive
aedoran a aimé ceci.
14 mars 2023 à 9 h 13
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,679
Mentions "j'aime": 2,340
Quoting: DirtyDangles
The thought would be to re-sign Provorov


LD is the last position that Detroit is worried about. Chiarot while not the greatest is still around for 3 more years. Maata and Walman extended, and there are several prospects near NHL ready including Edvinsson. Detroit needs a 2C and RHD.
Billy316 et aedoran a aimé ceci.
14 mars 2023 à 9 h 19
#5
RetireFedorov
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 976
Mentions "j'aime": 745
Wings pass, you traded the 1 area to them that's not a need
aedoran a aimé ceci.
14 mars 2023 à 9 h 20
#6
Jesus Christ Is King
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,607
Mentions "j'aime": 745
Quoting: DirtyDangles
The thought would be to re-sign Provorov


Your Target is LAK
They got a Provorov size hole on LD
That said PHI would have to RS of atleast 2m x 2 years to get them in the mix

He's still young but he's overpaid
I mean Petry's better and makes less but we had to trade him at a loss taking on term as no one else would offer picks or prospects.
Lucky for us Matheson has thrived here but similar to the Tatar trade he wasnt included because of that logic but because he wasnt earning his contract on his old team.


When he was 22-23 with those numbers people expected he'd hit another level so they were willing to pay
But at 26 its becoming clear he's not a #1 Defensman but more of a 2nd pair 3rd or 4th D being paid as a top guy.

My point is for LAK to get Value RS is a must .
The more you retain the higher the value.
Provorov at 50% RS brings everyone in the fold even cash strapped teams and teams looking to skate players then flip them like ANA did with Klingberg.



That said i think its more like

Provorov at 50% RS to LAK

For
Jordan Spence
Akil Thomas
Conditional 2nd that becomes a 1st if LAK makes WCF with Provorov playing half in 2022-23
Conditional 2nd that becomes a 1st if LAK makes WCF with Provorov playing half in 2023-24

Top RD Prospect outside Brandt Clarke who is not available.
Thomas who needs a system change and his speed based style is more appreciated in the East
Likely atleast 1/2 picks in the 2nd round turning into a 1st if not both (late 1st is like upgrading from the back of the line in the 2nd round to the front)
14 mars 2023 à 9 h 24
#7
Jesus Christ Is King
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 2,607
Mentions "j'aime": 745
Quoting: CoachCoach
LD is the last position that Detroit is worried about. Chiarot while not the greatest is still around for 3 more years. Maata and Walman extended, and there are several prospects near NHL ready including Edvinsson. Detroit needs a 2C and RHD.


I miss Chiarot.
I know Jake Allen more then anyone does after last night.
He's not a leader on any pair, but put him beside a Leader on any pair and he'll play up to their level.

If i could make a deal work i would
MTL has a cluster of LD though and while i'd give up Savard or Kovacevic next year after the TDL
That would be for a profit and to clear room.

Only way i see Chiarot coming back is if he learns to play back up goalie lol
14 mars 2023 à 9 h 25
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,835
Mentions "j'aime": 22,848
"Tearing it down" usually means trading high cap players and only expecting good picks in return. Teams can spend that cap on UFAs, and keep their picks. Yea, I don't see team that would want to give up so much for either so much cap or so little term.
14 mars 2023 à 9 h 34
#9
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: palhal
"Tearing it down" usually means trading high cap players and only expecting good picks in return. Teams can spend that cap on UFAs, and keep their picks. Yea, I don't see team that would want to give up so much for either so much cap or so little term.


Yes, you are right...teams never trade good picks for good players.
14 mars 2023 à 9 h 40
#10
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: CoachCoach
LD is the last position that Detroit is worried about. Chiarot while not the greatest is still around for 3 more years. Maata and Walman extended, and there are several prospects near NHL ready including Edvinsson. Detroit needs a 2C and RHD.


So you want to wait another 3-4 years before being a contender? Think Yzerman has had enough of the 10 year rebuild. Chiarot is not a top pairing guy. Also, Provy has played the right side in his career.
14 mars 2023 à 9 h 58
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 10,633
Mentions "j'aime": 8,236
Quoting: DirtyDangles
So you want to wait another 3-4 years before being a contender? Think Yzerman has had enough of the 10 year rebuild. Chiarot is not a top pairing guy. Also, Provy has played the right side in his career.


Unfortunately provorov would not make this team a contender. Also it will probably be another 3-4 years until we are contenders and that's the reality of it unless alot of players take massive strides in their play. Chiarot also doesn't play top pair, Walman plays top pair with Seider and from what I've seen they have been a top 5 pairing in the league. Provorov would be an upgrade over Maatta but the cost is drastically too great for the slight upgrade it would be. Not too mention he makes double what Maatta does. Those picks are more likely to have a greater impact on the team in comparison to what the difference of impact from Maatta to provorov would be.
For the rest of the trades, I don't think Columbus wants to move any firsts, they might be in on Hayes after the draft if they don't get one of the top players available but not at the cost of a first round pick.
I doubt Konecny pulls two firsts and a second as well, pretty expensive winger who is only a ppg player in this league now.
aedoran a aimé ceci.
14 mars 2023 à 10 h 10
#12
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: Lancebmx
Unfortunately provorov would not make this team a contender. Also it will probably be another 3-4 years until we are contenders and that's the reality of it unless alot of players take massive strides in their play. Chiarot also doesn't play top pair, Walman plays top pair with Seider and from what I've seen they have been a top 5 pairing in the league. Provorov would be an upgrade over Maatta but the cost is drastically too great for the slight upgrade it would be. Not too mention he makes double what Maatta does. Those picks are more likely to have a greater impact on the team in comparison to what the difference of impact from Maatta to provorov would be.
For the rest of the trades, I don't think Columbus wants to move any firsts, they might be in on Hayes after the draft if they don't get one of the top players available but not at the cost of a first round pick.
I doubt Konecny pulls two firsts and a second as well, pretty expensive winger who is only a ppg player in this league now.


Did you say "only a ppg" player and $5.5 mil is expensive? Canes 1sts are gonna be late 1sts so ya, I think a ppg player is worth that. Hayes with that kind of retention is definitely worth a later 1st but would take the CBJ 2nd as well since it should be at the top of the round.

As for your Wings assessment, sure you might be right but Provy would be your best LHD. Maatta is not very good and Chiarot is meh. Walman is not as good as you Wings fans like to claim he is. But ya, DET seems to be in a perpetual rebuild with no end in sight.
14 mars 2023 à 10 h 54
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 2,679
Mentions "j'aime": 2,340
Quoting: DirtyDangles
Did you say "only a ppg" player and $5.5 mil is expensive? Canes 1sts are gonna be late 1sts so ya, I think a ppg player is worth that. Hayes with that kind of retention is definitely worth a later 1st but would take the CBJ 2nd as well since it should be at the top of the round.

As for your Wings assessment, sure you might be right but Provy would be your best LHD. Maatta is not very good and Chiarot is meh. Walman is not as good as you Wings fans like to claim he is. But ya, DET seems to be in a perpetual rebuild with no end in sight.


Walman is the number 1 LD right now and you are correct in saying that he wouldn’t be if the Wings were contenders. He and Seider have been great, and with Edvinsson/AJ/Wallinder/Buium on the way hopefully one of them proves they can be top 4.

Provorov would be the number 1LD, however two mid 1sts is way too expensive when it won’t change the team. Maata has been just fine and is meant to be a 1-2 year stop gap until the kids are ready.

In two to three years the D core will be completely different.
aedoran a aimé ceci.
14 mars 2023 à 11 h 38
#14
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 8,734
Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
Not too many players go for multiple 1st and a high 2nd. I like TK, but he’s not Timo Meier
14 mars 2023 à 11 h 42
#15
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: Caniac555
Not too many players go for multiple 1st and a high 2nd. I like TK, but he’s not Timo Meier


Controlled vs rental
14 mars 2023 à 12 h 5
#16
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 8,734
Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
Go ahead and let me know the examples of controlled players who have been traded for 2x1st and a perceived high second.

Thanks for your comment, but it doesn’t really add much to the discussion. Timo Meier is not a rental

Quoting: DirtyDangles
Controlled vs rental
14 mars 2023 à 12 h 28
#17
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 8,734
Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
Yes…I’m quoting myself. I was curious so I looked for myself.

I stopped at 2009, and the only player traded in a deal similar to this was Phil Kessel back in 2009. You could make an argument with conditional picks included that players like Meier, Chychrun, and Seth Jones too…there just isn’t as much precedent for 2x1st and a 2nd rounder for a single player.

Quoting: Caniac555
Go ahead and let me know the examples of controlled players who have been traded for 2x1st and a perceived high second.

Thanks for your comment, but it doesn’t really add much to the discussion. Timo Meier is not a rental


Quoting: DirtyDangles
Controlled vs rental
14 mars 2023 à 13 h 19
#18
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: Caniac555
Yes…I’m quoting myself. I was curious so I looked for myself.

I stopped at 2009, and the only player traded in a deal similar to this was Phil Kessel back in 2009. You could make an argument with conditional picks included that players like Meier, Chychrun, and Seth Jones too…there just isn’t as much precedent for 2x1st and a 2nd rounder for a single player.


Mattias Ekholm just got traded for a 1st + Reid Schaffer (1st last year) + Barrie that could net a 2nd.
Claude Giroux (expiring contract) got traded for a 1st + Tippett (former early first) + 3rd
Brandon Hagle traded for 2 1sts + 2 NHLers
I won't use the Eichel trade even though I could
Blake Coleman garnered 2 1sts
Taylor Hall (expiring) for 1 st, a former 1st, a 3rd +

That's just back to 2019
14 mars 2023 à 13 h 25
#19
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 8,734
Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
You’ve stretched it a bit. But let’s go with it…let’s use Hagle and Coleman as examples. Using your logic, you’d accept 2023 1st + Ryan Suzuki (former 1st)?

Quoting: DirtyDangles
Mattias Ekholm just got traded for a 1st + Reid Schaffer (1st last year) + Barrie that could net a 2nd.
Claude Giroux (expiring contract) got traded for a 1st + Tippett (former early first) + 3rd
Brandon Hagle traded for 2 1sts + 2 NHLers
I won't use the Eichel trade even though I could
Blake Coleman garnered 2 1sts
Taylor Hall (expiring) for 1 st, a former 1st, a 3rd +

That's just back to 2019
14 mars 2023 à 13 h 28
#20
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: Caniac555
You’ve stretched it a bit. But let’s go with it…let’s use Hagle and Coleman as examples. Using your logic, you’d accept 2023 1st + Ryan Suzuki (former 1st)?


No because TK is better than both those guys.
14 mars 2023 à 13 h 28
#21
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 8,734
Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
He’s also more expensive (AAV)

Quoting: DirtyDangles
No because TK is better than both those guys.
14 mars 2023 à 13 h 31
#22
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 13,508
Mentions "j'aime": 3,060
Quoting: Caniac555
He’s also more expensive (AAV)


A ppg player at $5.5 is not expensive. It's actually below market value so "more expensive" isn't relevant.
14 mars 2023 à 13 h 42
#23
Hurricane Waddell
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 8,734
Mentions "j'aime": 3,601
It’s relevant when you use comps for two players who the lightning over paid for because they had low AAVs.

You’re twisting words, I said TK was ‘more expensive (AAV)’ not that his was expensive.

You are commenting as if I’ve said I don’t want or like TK, you don’t have to sell me on the player. The comment I made was on the return.

You won’t get 2x1st and a 2nd from the Canes for TK, find a different team.

Quoting: DirtyDangles
A ppg player at $5.5 is not expensive. It's actually below market value so "more expensive" isn't relevant.
14 mars 2023 à 14 h 0
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,731
Mentions "j'aime": 12,063
Quoting: Billy316
I miss Chiarot.
I know Jake Allen more then anyone does after last night.
He's not a leader on any pair, but put him beside a Leader on any pair and he'll play up to their level.

If i could make a deal work i would
MTL has a cluster of LD though and while i'd give up Savard or Kovacevic next year after the TDL
That would be for a profit and to clear room.

Only way i see Chiarot coming back is if he learns to play back up goalie lol


Why does Allen miss Chiarot doesn't he have anyone to blame bad goals on?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage