SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Adding grit

Créé par: AVS_fan
Équipe: 2022-23 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 27 févr. 2023
Publié: 27 févr. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
COL
  1. Grant, Derek
  2. Klingberg, John (2 000 000 $ retained)
ANA
  1. Girard, Samuel
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (COL)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2024
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2025
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $77 106 667 $25 000 $2 500 000 $5 393 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
4 425 000 $4 425 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
987 500 $987 500 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 févr. 2023 à 4 h 18
#1
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,975
Mentions "j'aime": 6,766
Girard is not a pickup the Ducks need, he would not be a good partner for Drysdale, and wouldn't supplant Fowler, and he deserves better than third pairing.
27 févr. 2023 à 5 h 19
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 879
Mentions "j'aime": 535
Given Klingberg’s value right now with his play and as an expiring UFA, I don’t believe the return is bad.

Anaheim gets a competent top-4 defenseman on a good contract with some experience and term (something they don’t have besides Fowler at the moment) as well as a pick (argue for a 2nd if you really think the retention and Grant are worth that)

Colorado gets an offensive defenceman rental to run PP2 if needed while freeing up space in the offseason for deals like MacKinnon’s and a 2C.

IMO Colorado loses this one but in terms of cap room, I don’t believe it’s bad
27 févr. 2023 à 7 h 33
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,697
Mentions "j'aime": 3,013
Quoting: QualityTrades1
Given Klingberg’s value right now with his play and as an expiring UFA, I don’t believe the return is bad.

Anaheim gets a competent top-4 defenseman on a good contract with some experience and term (something they don’t have besides Fowler at the moment) as well as a pick (argue for a 2nd if you really think the retention and Grant are worth that)

Colorado gets an offensive defenceman rental to run PP2 if needed while freeing up space in the offseason for deals like MacKinnon’s and a 2C.

IMO Colorado loses this one but in terms of cap room, I don’t believe it’s bad


Disagree, it’s pretty damn bad for Colorado. Klingberg also wouldn’t get PP2 time in Colorado. He would be behind Makar, Byram, and Toews on the depth chart.
NMAvsFan et ArakinSkywalker a aimé ceci.
27 févr. 2023 à 8 h 14
#4
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,481
Mentions "j'aime": 25,381
We would retain the full $3.5 million on Klingberg just to get positive assets for him, but I don't think that Colorado does this.

Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Girard is not a pickup the Ducks need, he would not be a good partner for Drysdale, and wouldn't supplant Fowler, and he deserves better than third pairing.

Why wouldn't we use him on the second pairing? We'd play Drysdale with Fowler.
27 févr. 2023 à 8 h 16
#5
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,975
Mentions "j'aime": 6,766
Modifié 27 févr. 2023 à 9 h 50
Quoting: OldNYIfan
We would retain the full $3.5 million on Klingberg just to get positive assets for him, but I don't think that Colorado does this.


Why wouldn't we use him on the second pairing? We'd play Drysdale with Fowler.


I don't believe Fowler-Drysdale work as a pairing because they suffer from the same issue of being able to be bumped off the puck.

Drysdale spent most of the year with Lindholm, spent a few games with Fowler before being paired with Vaakainen for the rest of the year.
27 févr. 2023 à 8 h 20
#6
Representing the 505
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,501
Mentions "j'aime": 3,686
Avs aren't trading Newhook - they need his cost-controlled years moving forward. And the Girard trade is awful for the Avs; trading 4 more years of Girard for a Klingberg rental and Derek Grant? No thanks.
OldNYIfan et ArakinSkywalker a aimé ceci.
27 févr. 2023 à 10 h 27
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 248
Mentions "j'aime": 134
Quoting: NMAvsFan
Avs aren't trading Newhook - they need his cost-controlled years moving forward. And the Girard trade is awful for the Avs; trading 4 more years of Girard for a Klingberg rental and Derek Grant? No thanks.


Agreed. If some semblance of this were to happen, I think the Avs keep Newhook, trade Girard for Bennett 1 for 1 and use the extra $500k space from that trade to go toward another D. Klingberg has no place on the Avs. They have 3 better offensive D in Makar, Byram and Toews. And even Klingberg's biggest fan will note that he's a defensive liability.
27 févr. 2023 à 12 h 54
#8
Representing the 505
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,501
Mentions "j'aime": 3,686
Quoting: LafayetteAvsFan
Agreed. If some semblance of this were to happen, I think the Avs keep Newhook, trade Girard for Bennett 1 for 1 and use the extra $500k space from that trade to go toward another D. Klingberg has no place on the Avs. They have 3 better offensive D in Makar, Byram and Toews. And even Klingberg's biggest fan will note that he's a defensive liability.


FLA would need to add to make up for the fact that Girard has two more years on his deal than does Bennett; straight-across is not a deal I would make.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage