intriguing move involving the rangers. my only problem is, that's a lot to give up to not get kane at 75%. if the hawks only retain 20%, it's more than likely a second and a conditional third (if that). IF the rangers acquire kane as 75% that's still asking a lot. maybe a first and a 3rd

No thanks on Murphy. We need top 6 fowards

Well, I love McCabe, but I just don't think he's a good fit for Granato's playing style.

That’s also way too much for him.

I would be good with a second plus mittelstadt, but the extra second and jost is overkill.

The Hawks don't make any of these deals. Maybe the Rangers trade, but definitely not the other 3.

I think the Wild would be all over retaining $3.15M cap for a 3rd.

McCabe for mitts and a 2nd and you are good with that? Are we losing our minds here, does anybody even watch Chicago games. McCabe is the same guy he was 5 years ago with the sabres! he is a 4-5 guy at best and you want to give up Mitts and a 2nd.. If that is the case go grab Schenn for a 2nd and get a bettr dman that hits, plays better defense and has a mean streak!

That return for McCabe would get a GM fired immediately. You arent even close man. Mccabe for a 2nd at the very best!

I like the schenn idea. I'm just saying the op is way too much

Even Mitts + a 2nd is too much