SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

They could get both and still have an above average prospect pool

Créé par: Bdawwwgy1
Équipe: 2022-23 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 22 févr. 2023
Publié: 22 févr. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Meier, Timo
Détails additionnels:
extended 4x9.5
SJS
  1. Mittelstadt, Casey
  2. Östlund, Noah
  3. Portillo, Erik [Liste de réserve]
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BUF)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (PHI)
Détails additionnels:
I have seen fellow sabres fans say things like "we just need to stay the course and continue to rebuild." i definitely dont think they need to trade pieces for rentals, but Chych has 2.5 years, and Timo will most likely come with an extension, and worse case scenario you have him 1.5 years. I think buffalo could still maintain an above average prospect pool while making huge jumps with 2 great players who have term


1st is top 10 protected.
2.
ARI
  1. Johnson, Ryan [Liste de réserve]
  2. Jokiharju, Henri
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (BUF)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
Détails additionnels:
1st is conditional. if SJS gets the 2024 first, then ARZ gets the 2025 first
3.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (BUF)
4.
BUF
CBJ
    They still have Savoie, Kulich, Quinn, JJP, Rosen, Kisakov, Levi, Poltapov, Neuchev, Novikov
    Rachats de contrats
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2023
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    2024
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    2025
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de BUF
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2382 500 000 $64 201 667 $0 $3 620 000 $18 298 333 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
    C, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
    4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    687 500 $687 500 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    837 500 $837 500 $
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    825 000 $825 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
    G
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
    1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    22 févr. 2023 à 15 h 40
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 8,800
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
    I dont see a world where that gets Meier. The talk right now is guys of Mercer/Jarvis level.

    Obviously it hasnt been met yet, but Ostlund isnt gonna do it
    22 févr. 2023 à 15 h 44
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2019
    Messages: 1,122
    Mentions "j'aime": 630
    Quoting: papishark
    I dont see a world where that gets Meier. The talk right now is guys of Mercer/Jarvis level.

    Obviously it hasnt been met yet, but Ostlund isnt gonna do it


    Mercer/Jarvis isn't being traded. Timo would've been already traded if those guys were available. Prospects like that never get traded.
    AndrewPawlack a aimé ceci.
    22 févr. 2023 à 15 h 45
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 8,800
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
    Quoting: ElectroMan
    Mercer/Jarvis isn't being traded. Timo would've been already traded if those guys were available. Prospects like that never get traded.


    Maybe not, but the ask isnt going from that to Ostlund
    22 févr. 2023 à 15 h 47
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2019
    Messages: 1,122
    Mentions "j'aime": 630
    Quoting: papishark
    Maybe not, but the ask isnt going from that to Ostlund


    Ostlund is a good prospect. That's probably the kind of prospect you'll get back in a trade.

    The Mercer/Jarvis talk is just reporters being dumb. Like Clarke being available a few weeks ago.
    Shibbal18 et AndrewPawlack a aimé ceci.
    22 févr. 2023 à 15 h 53
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 8,800
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
    Quoting: ElectroMan
    Ostlund is a good prospect. That's probably the kind of prospect you'll get back in a trade.

    The Mercer/Jarvis talk is just reporters being dumb. Like Clarke being available a few weeks ago.


    Ostlund is ok, but every team in the league can offer him. You dont stand out with this offer at all
    22 févr. 2023 à 16 h 6
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2022
    Messages: 1,466
    Mentions "j'aime": 620
    Never understood why people are scared to trade prospects for sure things like Meier or Chychrun who knows if those prospect will ever pan out
    22 févr. 2023 à 16 h 7
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    CbjSabresDucks
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 4,724
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
    Quoting: papishark
    Ostlund is ok, but every team in the league can offer him. You dont stand out with this offer at all


    not every team can. boston doesnt have a prospect close.


    and yeah, theres lots of Ostlunds. but theres not many teams that are willing to part with an Ostlund along with a young C on pace for 50 points, a good goalie prospect, and a first and second. Buffalo is one of the only teams with that kind of firepower to utilize
    22 févr. 2023 à 16 h 8
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2019
    Messages: 1,122
    Mentions "j'aime": 630
    Quoting: papishark
    Ostlund is ok, but every team in the league can offer him. You dont stand out with this offer at all


    I mean we don't know what's being offered. A lot of teams could've beaten Faber for Fiala, but they didn't. A lot of teams could've beaten Ottawa's offer for Cat, but they didn't.

    Best offers might be Noel Gunler or Mukhamadullin.
    Shibbal18 et AndrewPawlack a aimé ceci.
    22 févr. 2023 à 16 h 11
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2019
    Messages: 1,122
    Mentions "j'aime": 630
    Quoting: Pensfan303
    Never understood why people are scared to trade prospects for sure things like Meier or Chychrun who knows if those prospect will ever pan out


    Anybody would trade these prospects in a vacuum for Timo/Chychurn. These moves don't happen in a vacuum though. There are cap reasons why fans are hesitant to make these moves. Timo will have a significant cap hit. Chychrun is a FA in 2 years.
    22 févr. 2023 à 16 h 12
    #10
    Shibbal18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2016
    Messages: 25,403
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,107
    I think I may have found a way for us to get Bonds and Griffey, and we wouldn’t have to give up that much.
    sabres89 a aimé ceci.
    22 févr. 2023 à 16 h 17
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2023
    Messages: 26
    Mentions "j'aime": 11
    If Jarvis or Mercer where offered there isn't much on top of that if at all. Those players won't be moving. Imo this offer for Meier is too much but Buffalo can afford it if they so choose to. don't see any team trying to beat this, These moves definitely put Buffalo on the next level.
    Bdawwwgy1 a aimé ceci.
    22 févr. 2023 à 16 h 25
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2017
    Messages: 8,383
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,327
    Quoting: papishark
    I dont see a world where that gets Meier. The talk right now is guys of Mercer/Jarvis level.

    Obviously it hasnt been met yet, but Ostlund isnt gonna do it


    This is curious to me. Mercer was taken in the 20s, Jarvis was 13th I believe. Ostlund was taken 16th in his draft. Besides Mercer and Jarvis being 3 years older, and having a few extra years to show that they are indeed going to be nhl players, why so sure that these guys will be better? Honestly, I would rate our forward prospects- savoie, kulich, ostlund, then Rosen- but it's close. Savoie was the earliest pick, but he's 5'9", and hasn't taken the big step we might have wanted (to be fair, the winnipeg ice are loaded, and he's on track). Kulich looked really good in the juniors tournament, and he's doing OK in the ahl, he's probably closest to nhl ready, he's 5'10" but he looks a lot more muscular). Ostlund is also 5'10", playing against men and producing now, probably trending towards solid middle 6 center). Rosen I have as last because he's a winger and he still needs to add some muscle, he also looked very good in the juniors tournament. I just don't see these guys as being all that different.
    22 févr. 2023 à 17 h 28
    #13
    19 lotteries, 0 wins
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 1,243
    Mentions "j'aime": 766
    Quoting: ElectroMan
    I mean we don't know what's being offered. A lot of teams could've beaten Faber for Fiala, but they didn't. A lot of teams could've beaten Ottawa's offer for Cat, but they didn't.

    Best offers might be Noel Gunler or Mukhamadullin.


    ^
    Quoting: papishark
    I dont see a world where that gets Meier. The talk right now is guys of Mercer/Jarvis level.

    Obviously it hasnt been met yet, but Ostlund isnt gonna do it


    remember how much people put in for Eichel than what it actually was? This Ostlund trade is probably realistic.

    Goofy as it is Ostlund was technically in that trade too
    22 févr. 2023 à 17 h 36
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2021
    Messages: 7,136
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
    True
    But the more important issue (imo) is that it’s hard to see w way where we can pay Chychrun and Power and Dahlin all the big $$$ they’ll demand on their next contracts
    22 févr. 2023 à 17 h 58
    #15
    Démarrer sujet
    CbjSabresDucks
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 4,724
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
    Quoting: Buffalove
    True
    But the more important issue (imo) is that it’s hard to see w way where we can pay Chychrun and Power and Dahlin all the big $$$ they’ll demand on their next contracts


    Chych expires a year after the other two, so you wont have to re sign them all at once. A skinner buyout of a different trade might happen to. Speaking of, i think the best thing to do is to lock those guys up this summer long term to keep the AAV down. maybe Rasmus at 8x9M and Owen at 6x7.5M?
    22 févr. 2023 à 18 h 5
    #16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2021
    Messages: 7,136
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
    Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
    Chych expires a year after the other two, so you wont have to re sign them all at once. A skinner buyout of a different trade might happen to. Speaking of, i think the best thing to do is to lock those guys up this summer long term to keep the AAV down. maybe Rasmus at 8x9M and Owen at 6x7.5M?


    Just bc we wanna lock them up now (at a lower cost) doesn’t mean the player will agree- they have agents for a reason

    If Dahlin costs under $10mil then Adams should get GM of the year
    He could easily cost around $12mil per


    And just bc Chychrun would presumably sign a year after Dahlin & Power, it doesn’t mean we’d be able to afford him at around the $10mil per he likely demands

    I don’t see how we can devote around $30mil per year for 3 defensemen
    That’s just not smart to devote that much Cap to the defense
    22 févr. 2023 à 18 h 31
    #17
    Démarrer sujet
    CbjSabresDucks
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 4,724
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
    Quoting: Buffalove
    Just bc we wanna lock them up now (at a lower cost) doesn’t mean the player will agree- they have agents for a reason

    If Dahlin costs under $10mil then Adams should get GM of the year
    He could easily cost around $12mil per




    And just bc Chychrun would presumably sign a year after Dahlin & Power, it doesn’t mean we’d be able to afford him at around the $10mil per he likely demands

    I don’t see how we can devote around $30mil per year for 3 defensemen
    That’s just not smart to devote that much Cap to the defense




    Why are you only considering the future? this Buffalo team is good now, and these trades theoretically should lock them into the wildcard spot. then you still have him 2 years. If youre out of the playoffs by the time he expires, trade him and he will surely fetch you a 1st +
    22 févr. 2023 à 18 h 39
    #18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2021
    Messages: 7,136
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
    Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
    Why are you only considering the future? this Buffalo team is good now, and these trades theoretically should lock them into the wildcard spot. then you still have him 2 years. If youre out of the playoffs by the time he expires, trade him and he will surely fetch you a 1st +


    Bc we aren’t winning a Cup this year- or next
    And giving up major assets, to turn around and flip Chychrun for less of a return in a year or 2 seems pretty dumb to me

    Especially when we can use our assets to bring in guys that can help now- and in the long run

    It’s not a video game dude
    22 févr. 2023 à 18 h 57
    #19
    Démarrer sujet
    CbjSabresDucks
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 4,724
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,180
    Quoting: Buffalove
    Bc we aren’t winning a Cup this year- or next
    And giving up major assets, to turn around and flip Chychrun for less of a return in a year or 2 seems pretty dumb to me

    Especially when we can use our assets to bring in guys that can help now- and in the long run

    It’s not a video game dude


    thats not a video game type move though


    The metro is gonna be wide open. buffalo has an absurd riches of young talent. Youre getting Chych for 2.5 years
    22 févr. 2023 à 19 h 13
    #20
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2021
    Messages: 7,136
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
    Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
    thats not a video game type move though


    The metro is gonna be wide open. buffalo has an absurd riches of young talent. Youre getting Chych for 2.5 years


    Sure, if we wanna lose him for nothing
    In all reality, if we did this, he should be traded before that last season even starts (to maximize his trade value)

    And he’s not good on the right side
    Not a good match for Power

    And it is a video game move
    Acquiring someone for the short term while we are still building is just nonsense in this case
    It would only make sense if he got into our top4 and was gonna be here long term
    23 févr. 2023 à 1 h 29
    #21
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 8,800
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
    Quoting: sabres89
    This is curious to me. Mercer was taken in the 20s, Jarvis was 13th I believe. Ostlund was taken 16th in his draft. Besides Mercer and Jarvis being 3 years older, and having a few extra years to show that they are indeed going to be nhl players, why so sure that these guys will be better? Honestly, I would rate our forward prospects- savoie, kulich, ostlund, then Rosen- but it's close. Savoie was the earliest pick, but he's 5'9", and hasn't taken the big step we might have wanted (to be fair, the winnipeg ice are loaded, and he's on track). Kulich looked really good in the juniors tournament, and he's doing OK in the ahl, he's probably closest to nhl ready, he's 5'10" but he looks a lot more muscular). Ostlund is also 5'10", playing against men and producing now, probably trending towards solid middle 6 center). Rosen I have as last because he's a winger and he still needs to add some muscle, he also looked very good in the juniors tournament. I just don't see these guys as being all that different.


    Proven vs unproven. Ostlund is good, but clearly not a Mike Grier pick and not scoring at the same rate as other guys.

    Rumors last year said the Sharks wanted Savoie and traded down after not getting him (had the chance to draft Ostlund), so I predict he would be the ask.
    sabres89 a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage