SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Who Says No

Créé par: bogdown
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 17 janv. 2023
Publié: 17 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
In my opinion I would not trade Hughes unless you get a behemoth offer. He’s a franchise defenseman with unreal transitional skating and elite playmaking ability. Just watch his vision on the past few stretch passes to Miller.

Brandt Clarke would be nice and he looks like a stud but his ceiling can’t go higher than Hughes. This is just for value.
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $72 691 667 $1 250 000 $850 000 $9 808 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $
DD
RFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 janv. 2023 à 12 h 37
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 1,061
Mentions "j'aime": 353
Canucks
tydini11 a aimé ceci.
17 janv. 2023 à 12 h 37
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 957
Mentions "j'aime": 418
The Kings say no lol
Hughes is obviously a good player but not a good fit for the Kings.
17 janv. 2023 à 12 h 38
#3
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,570
Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
Come on now. Brandt Clarke is not that impressive. Hughes is literally a 99th percentile in transition and skating. Clarke plus two 1sts and I still prob wouldn't do it.
Canucker, bogdown et tydini11 a aimé ceci.
17 janv. 2023 à 12 h 38
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 1,071
Mentions "j'aime": 160
Canucks say no forsure. Hughes is worth more than that
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
17 janv. 2023 à 12 h 39
#5
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,570
Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
Quoting: Hckeydude123
The Kings say no lol
Hughes is obviously a good player but not a good fit for the Kings.


Hows that?
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
17 janv. 2023 à 12 h 39
#6
I hate this team
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 981
Mentions "j'aime": 979
Canucks
Hughes is already an elite d-man
Clarke's ceiling is basically Hughes rn
but I don't think the Kings have the cap anyways
Anus_McLeod et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
17 janv. 2023 à 12 h 44
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 957
Mentions "j'aime": 418
Quoting: BigShoots
Hows that?


Who would he play with? Doughty? who his whole career as played along side a shut down Dman for a reason. Durzi? Who is a defensive liability. Roy? he might be the best fit with Hughes but he wont be in LA much longer so then who? Spence?
17 janv. 2023 à 12 h 59
#8
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,570
Mentions "j'aime": 1,087
Quoting: Hckeydude123
Who would he play with? Doughty? who his whole career as played along side a shut down Dman for a reason. Durzi? Who is a defensive liability. Roy? he might be the best fit with Hughes but he wont be in LA much longer so then who? Spence?


Doughty seems like the perfect fit given his defensive metrics and declining offensive production. Hughes could revitalize his career. Roy would also be a good fit.

If that's your analysis who is Clarke going to play with? He needs more help defensively than Hughes from what I've seen of him at WJC.
17 janv. 2023 à 14 h 26
#9
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,408
Mentions "j'aime": 25,314
Clearly only the Canucks. I can foresee a scenario in which Vancouver HAS to trade Hughes, but that's the only circumstance in which they would do so. Clarke is unlikely to exceed Hughes' level (I can't see him being the next Fox or Makar), as much as I love and hope for him. Meanwhile, we know what an All-Star Hughes is. All the risk is Vancouver's.
17 janv. 2023 à 14 h 28
#10
Démarrer sujet
Bog
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 916
Mentions "j'aime": 335
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Clearly only the Canucks. I can foresee a scenario in which Vancouver HAS to trade Hughes, but that's the only circumstance in which they would do so. Clarke is unlikely to exceed Hughes' level (I can't see him being the next Fox or Makar), as much as I love and hope for him. Meanwhile, we know what an All-Star Hughes is. All the risk is Vancouver's.


Well I think in the case of a rebuild this would make sense to buy two or three years and not waste Hughes' prime years. But since the Canucks want to retool again I'd keep him 100%.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage