SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

This wouldve been awesome

Créé par: pensfan21
Équipe: 2022-23 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 15 janv. 2023
Publié: 15 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de NJD
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de FLA
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2025
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $80 118 508 $0 $400 000 $2 381 492 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 janv. 2023 à 16 h 26
#1
Habs4Ever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 4,297
Mentions "j'aime": 1,737
The important one is Smith vs Marino
15 janv. 2023 à 16 h 27
#2
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,640
Mentions "j'aime": 3,472
There was no way in hell that Seattle was taking a washed up Carter over Tanev or McCann.
15 janv. 2023 à 16 h 44
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 2,109
Mentions "j'aime": 480
The funny thing is we could’ve still kept Jeff Carter as well. It would either have been McCann or Tanev to choose from or protect both of them over Carter and Kappy as Carter was going to be on a one year contract and 36 years old at the time I think and would probably have no interest in playing in Seattle. And Kappy would’ve been more cap reasons I feel like. It sucks as well cause that line of McCann-Carter-Freddy Gaudreau/Zucker were dominant together. And I’m not gonna lie I rather would’ve kept Gaudreau over ERod and McCann over Kappy. Because either way our top 6 would’ve been solid. At the end of the day the downfall should’ve been seen at the expansion draft and who Hextall chose to protect. I understand wanting to keep Carter and Kappy but I feel like Seattle would’ve taken someone else if Carter and Kappy were exposed.
15 janv. 2023 à 17 h 54
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 939
Mentions "j'aime": 407
Quoting: evelutions2
There was no way in hell that Seattle was taking a washed up Carter over Tanev or McCann.


I think people forget, this was the offseason after we aquired Carter. When we initially got him, he scored 9 goals in 14 games with us, and then 4 goals in 6 playoff games and was arguably the best Pens forward in that series against the Isles that still haunts me in my nightmares. Carter was not washed up at the time, and the rumor was that if he was not protected, he'd be the pick. Hextall didn't want to do that because he'd just aquired a player who at the time was a fantastic 3C. The problem was that Carter didn't stay good for as long as we hoped, and the extention was a bad idea.

Quoting: BestGMBenning
The funny thing is we could’ve still kept Jeff Carter as well. It would either have been McCann or Tanev to choose from or protect both of them over Carter and Kappy as Carter was going to be on a one year contract and 36 years old at the time I think and would probably have no interest in playing in Seattle. And Kappy would’ve been more cap reasons I feel like. It sucks as well cause that line of McCann-Carter-Freddy Gaudreau/Zucker were dominant together. And I’m not gonna lie I rather would’ve kept Gaudreau over ERod and McCann over Kappy. Because either way our top 6 would’ve been solid. At the end of the day the downfall should’ve been seen at the expansion draft and who Hextall chose to protect. I understand wanting to keep Carter and Kappy but I feel like Seattle would’ve taken someone else if Carter and Kappy were exposed.


Also worth remembering that that season was Kapanen's first in Pittsburgh, and also the best season of his career. He was 24, was at a 60 point pace, and looked like a future staple of our top 6. We can say with hindsight that protecting Kapanen and Carter was a bad idea, but we cannot blame management for those decisions when they were good at the time. As for protecting Gaudreau, his career in Pittsburgh is less than 20 games, and under 20 also described his career point total at the time of the expansion draft. I don't think he was gonna be taken. As a matter of fact, the only other player of any significant left unprotected was Zucker, and he was coming off of a nightmare season and was pretty safe. Hextall's choices made sense at the time.
15 janv. 2023 à 18 h 12
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 3,632
Mentions "j'aime": 1,271
Quoting: Haymaker26
I think people forget, this was the offseason after we aquired Carter. When we initially got him, he scored 9 goals in 14 games with us, and then 4 goals in 6 playoff games and was arguably the best Pens forward in that series against the Isles that still haunts me in my nightmares. Carter was not washed up at the time, and the rumor was that if he was not protected, he'd be the pick. Hextall didn't want to do that because he'd just aquired a player who at the time was a fantastic 3C. The problem was that Carter didn't stay good for as long as we hoped, and the extention was a bad idea.



Also worth remembering that that season was Kapanen's first in Pittsburgh, and also the best season of his career. He was 24, was at a 60 point pace, and looked like a future staple of our top 6. We can say with hindsight that protecting Kapanen and Carter was a bad idea, but we cannot blame management for those decisions when they were good at the time. As for protecting Gaudreau, his career in Pittsburgh is less than 20 games, and under 20 also described his career point total at the time of the expansion draft. I don't think he was gonna be taken. As a matter of fact, the only other player of any significant left unprotected was Zucker, and he was coming off of a nightmare season and was pretty safe. Hextall's choices made sense at the time.


I really think they would have taken ZAR before they took Carter. But even if they took Carter it's not the end of the world. A player that age could drop off at any point. We had options available to replace him in free agency. Having your top 3 centers around 35 years old just is not a good idea
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage