SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kane Longshot

Créé par: PhysicalGraffiti
Équipe: 2022-23 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 22 déc. 2022
Publié: 22 déc. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Kane, Patrick (5 250 000 $ retained)
CHI
  1. Beecher, John
  2. Lysell, Fabian
  3. Reilly, Mike
  4. Smith, Craig
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
  6. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (LAK)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
3.
BOS
SJS
  1. Wagner, Chris
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de LAK
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de LAK
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de LAK
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2025
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $74 491 667 $0 $4 650 000 $8 008 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
-2 625 000 $-2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 000 000 $$2M)
C
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
AG, C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 déc. 2022 à 11 h 8
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,314
Mentions "j'aime": 4,702
For Wagner to the sharks. In the past 1.25-1.5 mil retention (and Wagner is 100% cap dump here) usually carries a 4th, 5th might not be enough to make it happen.
22 déc. 2022 à 11 h 10
#2
Démarrer sujet
MassToSoCal
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 176
Mentions "j'aime": 36
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
For Wagner to the sharks. In the past 1.25-1.5 mil retention (and Wagner is 100% cap dump here) usually carries a 4th, 5th might not be enough to make it happen.


4th is fine with me.
22 déc. 2022 à 11 h 15
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,882
Mentions "j'aime": 8,874
Modifié 22 déc. 2022 à 11 h 22
Boston is not going after Kane. And that trade is horrible.

A 27 year old Kane with term gets a return like that. A 34 year old rental with full control over where he goes limiting Chi abilty to negotiate better deal gets half that.

Also terrible fit for Boston.
22 déc. 2022 à 11 h 16
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,517
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: PhysicalGraffiti
4th is fine with me.


A 4th to save $225k in cap space? Seems like bad asset management to me
Gofnut999 a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2022 à 11 h 18
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,314
Mentions "j'aime": 4,702
Quoting: ON3M4N
A 4th to save $225k in cap space? Seems like bad asset management to me


kind of agree but it would take a 4th for a team to take on a 1.35 mil contract that is a pure cap dump.
22 déc. 2022 à 11 h 20
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,882
Mentions "j'aime": 8,874
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
kind of agree but it would take a 4th for a team to take on a 1.35 mil contract that is a pure cap dump.


Except it isn’t. Buried it’s 225k. And it’s prorated so at the deadline it’s less than a used car. Lol.
22 déc. 2022 à 11 h 23
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,314
Mentions "j'aime": 4,702
Quoting: Gofnut999
Except it isn’t. Buried it’s 225k. And it’s prorated so at the deadline it’s less than a used car. Lol.


buried or not the sharks have to pay it and 1.35 mil for a 5th isn't smart. in the past when 3rd party teams retained 1.35 mil in contracts it was for a 4th.
we don't care that he is buried.
22 déc. 2022 à 11 h 27
#8
Emotionally in 2018
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 9,293
Mentions "j'aime": 3,387
Lol this team (in theory) would be hilariously good
22 déc. 2022 à 11 h 29
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,882
Mentions "j'aime": 8,874
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
buried or not the sharks have to pay it and 1.35 mil for a 5th isn't smart. in the past when 3rd party teams retained 1.35 mil in contracts it was for a 4th.
we don't care that he is buried.


Lol. You are not paying 1.35 that was the point.

Being buried does matter.

You clearly don’t understand how cap works.

It’s a bad trade for Boston. You get a 5th for free. 🙄. You leave Wagner in the AHL for rest of the season it would cost you roughly 33k of cap space this year. Oh the horror. Lol
Newgod77 a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2022 à 12 h 14
#10
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,818
Mentions "j'aime": 10,021
As a Hawks fan, I don't think BOS should be targeting Kaner. I'm not sure Kaner would waive for BOS either. I don't have any inside sources, but it just doesn't seem like a good fit. Kaner doesn't have to play the #1 RW because he's played on the 2nd line away from Toews his entire career, but he's going to ask what PP unit he'll be on for sure AND what role he'd play on that unit. I'm not sure what BOS response would be. What do BOS fans think about Kaner leading your #1 PP unit?
Gofnut999 a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2022 à 12 h 37
#11
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,839
Mentions "j'aime": 25,659
Los Angeles doesn't need a late-developing bottom-pairing defenseman. Plus there's some bad karma there.
22 déc. 2022 à 12 h 49
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,314
Mentions "j'aime": 4,702
Quoting: Gofnut999
Lol. You are not paying 1.35 that was the point.

Being buried does matter.

You clearly don’t understand how cap works.

It’s a bad trade for Boston. You get a 5th for free. 🙄. You leave Wagner in the AHL for rest of the season it would cost you roughly 33k of cap space this year. Oh the horror. Lol


you clearly don't understand contracts.
sharks would still have to pay his salary for nothing. it may only be 225K in cap loss but its till the pro-rated portion of a 1.35 mil contract we would have to pay.
it isn't free its cost a lot of money for a late pick and would not be financially smart to give up that much money unless it was for a decent pick (4th or higher)
22 déc. 2022 à 12 h 58
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,517
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
you clearly don't understand contracts.
sharks would still have to pay his salary for nothing. it may only be 225K in cap loss but its till the pro-rated portion of a 1.35 mil contract we would have to pay.
it isn't free its cost a lot of money for a late pick and would not be financially smart to give up that much money unless it was for a decent pick (4th or higher)


Hi
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
you clearly don't understand contracts.
sharks would still have to pay his salary for nothing. it may only be 225K in cap loss but its till the pro-rated portion of a 1.35 mil contract we would have to pay.
it isn't free its cost a lot of money for a late pick and would not be financially smart to give up that much money unless it was for a decent pick (4th or higher)


His real money owes to start the year was $1 million. For simplicity let's say half will have been paid already this year by the TDL. It would be $225k cap hit and $500k in actual money owed. That's peanuts in the NHL.
22 déc. 2022 à 13 h 1
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,314
Mentions "j'aime": 4,702
Quoting: ON3M4N
Hi

His real money owes to start the year was $1 million. For simplicity let's say half will have been paid already this year by the TDL. It would be $225k cap hit and $500k in actual money owed. That's peanuts in the NHL.


its still 500k out of the sharks owners pocket for a 5th round draft pick. and its losing a pick for 225K of cap savings for Boston, neither side of the deal makes much sense.
22 déc. 2022 à 13 h 10
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,882
Mentions "j'aime": 8,874
Modifié 22 déc. 2022 à 13 h 18
Quoting: ON3M4N
Hi

His real money owes to start the year was $1 million. For simplicity let's say half will have been paid already this year by the TDL. It would be $225k cap hit and $500k in actual money owed. That's peanuts in the NHL.


Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
its still 500k out of the sharks owners pocket for a 5th round draft pick. and its losing a pick for 225K of cap savings for Boston, neither side of the deal makes much sense.


And at the deadline it’s more like 85% has been paid. Leaving about 150k in salary. Absolutely nothing.

And Boston is not saving 225k. That’s his cap hit for a full season. They would be saving about 30 days worth. Around 30-35k. So even worse.
22 déc. 2022 à 13 h 21
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,314
Mentions "j'aime": 4,702
Quoting: Gofnut999
And at the deadline it’s more like 85% has been paid. Leaving about 150k in salary. Absolutely nothing.

And Boston is not saving 225k. That’s his cap hit for a full season. They would be saving about 30 days worth. Around 30-35k. So even worse.


so why do it?
22 déc. 2022 à 13 h 25
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,882
Mentions "j'aime": 8,874
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
so why do it?


They don’t. There is no value in moving him.
22 déc. 2022 à 14 h 31
#18
BORDEGOD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,310
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Why is someone complaining about taking on Wagner less than 2 mil on an expiring deal. Grier takes that for a 5th all day. Hell we'll even put him on the 2nd line and bolster our chances at a higher 1st rounder. We'll even take Craig Smith for a 3rd. No reason SJ can't eat some turds for extra draft ammunition
PhysicalGraffiti a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2022 à 17 h 5
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,517
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
its still 500k out of the sharks owners pocket for a 5th round draft pick. and its losing a pick for 225K of cap savings for Boston, neither side of the deal makes much sense.


Carolina essentially paid $4.25 million for a 1st round pick when they took on Marleau a few years back.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage