SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Meimer

Créé par: Tbrew
Équipe: 2022-23 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 20 déc. 2022
Publié: 20 déc. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. McLeod, Michael
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
2.
NJD
  1. Meier, Timo (3 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Reimer, James
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (CBJ)
SJS
  1. Blackwood, Mackenzie
  2. Boqvist, Jesper
  3. Holtz, Alexander
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
Comp is the DeBrincat return, plus MAF return

Holtz is the premium asset, like the Ottawa 1st
Two 2nds for the MAF 2nd traded and the 2nd traded for Cat
Boqvist in there instead of a 3rd
Mack is in there to balance out goalies, and going over the comp warranted a sweetener mid round from the SJ side
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de CBJ
Logo de NJD
2024
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2025
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $78 397 500 $0 $482 500 $4 102 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
5 450 000 $5 450 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
0 $0 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 166 667 $3 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 166 666 $4 166 666 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 déc. 2022 à 20 h 27
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 9,138
Mentions "j'aime": 11,117
The only thing I think that prevents the Hawks from considering this deal is that McLeod was on that 2018 Canada WJC team. Until that whole thing is resolved, I'm not sure any GM is trading for any of those guys.
Tbrew et RicXX a aimé ceci.
20 déc. 2022 à 20 h 32
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 2,615
Mentions "j'aime": 1,079
Quoting: Hawksguy81
The only thing I think that prevents the Hawks from considering this deal is that McLeod was on that 2018 Canada WJC team. Until that whole thing is resolved, I'm not sure any GM is trading for any of those guys.


That’s definitely fair. Maybe just mid+late round pick instead
Hawksguy81 et RicXX a aimé ceci.
20 déc. 2022 à 20 h 38
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,322
Mentions "j'aime": 4,970
Hawks probably prefer to not put a 2018 WJ convicts line together

Katchoik-Mcloud-Raddysh
Hawksguy81, Tbrew et Tintin a aimé ceci.
20 déc. 2022 à 20 h 43
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 9,138
Mentions "j'aime": 11,117
Quoting: Tbrew
That’s definitely fair. Maybe just mid+late round pick instead


I think you're spot on there. A 2023 4th and a 2024 6th probably gets it done. Lafferty is a guy that fits on any roster. Never takes a shift off. Very fast. Good on the PK.
Tbrew a aimé ceci.
20 déc. 2022 à 20 h 49
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,643
Mentions "j'aime": 532
Don't like not getting a 1st but agree with your trade details logic (i.e., Holtz = 7OA). Don't think SJ would be sending a 5th for blackwood though since I don't even think SJ has interest.
20 déc. 2022 à 20 h 50
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,344
Mentions "j'aime": 4,720
sharks would really want a 23 1st from a deal like this, but this isn’t a bad deal.
what about?

Meier 50% retained plus Reimer and Robins
for
Holtz 23 1st, 24 2nd and Walsh.

would you consider that? Robins is actually a really solid player and has potential but is smaller and if we get Holtz then his path to the NHL is much more difficult.
just spit balling here, you deal isn’t far off though.

if Blackwood needs to be added it would be for cap only and would not garner anything going back to NJD.
20 déc. 2022 à 21 h 35
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,360
Mentions "j'aime": 18,795
Quoting: Wadejos123
Hawks probably prefer to not put a 2018 WJ convicts line together

Katchoik-Mcloud-Raddysh


Nobody has been convicted of anything.

But feel for poor Boris Katchoik, Michael Mcloud, Tyler Raddish who are only guilty of having names similar to Boris Katchouk, Michael McLeod, Tayler Raddysh
RicXX a aimé ceci.
20 déc. 2022 à 21 h 38
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,360
Mentions "j'aime": 18,795
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
sharks would really want a 23 1st from a deal like this, but this isn’t a bad deal.
what about?

Meier 50% retained plus Reimer and Robins
for
Holtz 23 1st, 24 2nd and Walsh.

would you consider that? Robins is actually a really solid player and has potential but is smaller and if we get Holtz then his path to the NHL is much more difficult.
just spit balling here, you deal isn’t far off though.

if Blackwood needs to be added it would be for cap only and would not garner anything going back to NJD.


Simplify....

One of - Holtz or 2023 1st
One of - 2023 2nd or 2024 2nd
One of - Boqvist or similar

For Meier (assuming contract is signed)
20 déc. 2022 à 21 h 49
#9
BORDEGOD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,310
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Sharks have zero interest in adding a goalie. Needs to be a 1st in there if were trading our best player with half retention.
20 déc. 2022 à 21 h 52
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 6,866
Mentions "j'aime": 2,585
So you use a complete fleecing as a comp ( 1 major reason I hate the comp is ...lah blah blah) Always one that heavily favors their favorite team
20 déc. 2022 à 21 h 59
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 2,615
Mentions "j'aime": 1,079
Quoting: Boltsbeathabs
So you use a complete fleecing as a comp ( 1 major reason I hate the comp is ...lah blah blah) Always one that heavily favors their favorite team


Seravalli reported that Meier is likely to fetch LESS than DeBrincat, so I used it as the comp to actually favor the Sharks more
Tintin a aimé ceci.
20 déc. 2022 à 22 h 1
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 2,615
Mentions "j'aime": 1,079
Quoting: Kjell_Forsman
Sharks have zero interest in adding a goalie. Needs to be a 1st in there if were trading our best player with half retention.


Alex Holtz or a first. Choose one.
Retention doesn’t even need to be on the table tbh
Mack is included to balance out the fact that a goalie was going the other way. He doesn’t need to be in there either I guess, and I’d be happy with this team running 3 netminder instead of my scenario with Mason Geertsen being called up
Tintin a aimé ceci.
20 déc. 2022 à 22 h 42
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,344
Mentions "j'aime": 4,720
Quoting: Tbrew
Alex Holtz or a first. Choose one.
Retention doesn’t even need to be on the table tbh
Mack is included to balance out the fact that a goalie was going the other way. He doesn’t need to be in there either I guess, and I’d be happy with this team running 3 netminder instead of my scenario with Mason Geertsen being called up


i opt for none then. Meier is worth Holtz and a 1st.
let’s just use the Tkatchuk comp and ask Marino Bratt and walsh plus the 25 1st then!
poeticentropy a aimé ceci.
20 déc. 2022 à 22 h 59
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 2,615
Mentions "j'aime": 1,079
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
i opt for none then. Meier is worth Holtz and a 1st.
let’s just use the Tkatchuk comp and ask Marino Bratt and walsh plus the 25 1st then!


If Tkachuk was the expected value, then it would be approate to use as a comp. It isn’t though… and for good reason. Matt Tkachuk was a 104 point player at the time of the trade. Timo Meier has never had a point per game season in his career and isn’t on pace for one now.
20 déc. 2022 à 23 h 27
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,643
Mentions "j'aime": 532
Quoting: Tbrew
Seravalli reported that Meier is likely to fetch LESS than DeBrincat, so I used it as the comp to actually favor the Sharks more


While DeBrincat is better they're close to the same production this season, both on terrible teams. Meier brings a much more physical presence too. So agree it would be less for Meier but I don't think by much.
NJD's 1st is going to be so late so obviously Holtz is more valuable in that choice. If no 1st then maybe fulfill with more later picks or another prospect since NJ is loaded with good ones? Don't think SJ will want to trade Meier for what is being offered.
Tbrew a aimé ceci.
21 déc. 2022 à 0 h 23
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,344
Mentions "j'aime": 4,720
Modifié 21 déc. 2022 à 0 h 36
Quoting: Tbrew
If Tkachuk was the expected value, then it would be approate to use as a comp. It isn’t though… and for good reason. Matt Tkachuk was a 104 point player at the time of the trade. Timo Meier has never had a point per game season in his career and isn’t on pace for one now.


and Huberdeau was a 115 point wing and Bratt hasn’t come close to that either, i could argue Meier is closer to Tkatchuk than Marino and Bratt are to Weager and Huberdeau!
tkatchuk 82gp 42g 104p 1.26ppg
Meier 77gp 35g 76p .987ppg
Huberdeau 80gp 30g 115p 1.43ppg
Bratt 76gp 26g 73p .96ppg

if anything Bratt Marino and the 25 1st is a weaker return for Meier than the Tkatchuk deal!
21 déc. 2022 à 1 h 45
#17
BORDEGOD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,310
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Quoting: Tbrew
Alex Holtz or a first. Choose one.
Retention doesn’t even need to be on the table tbh
Mack is included to balance out the fact that a goalie was going the other way. He doesn’t need to be in there either I guess, and I’d be happy with this team running 3 netminder instead of my scenario with Mason Geertsen being called up


Holtz (a struggling prospect) or a late 1st? Delusion is not a good color for you. It's not even close.
21 déc. 2022 à 8 h 17
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 2,615
Mentions "j'aime": 1,079
Modifié 21 déc. 2022 à 11 h 43
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
and Huberdeau was a 115 point wing and Bratt hasn’t come close to that either, i could argue Meier is closer to Tkatchuk than Marino and Bratt are to Weager and Huberdeau!
tkatchuk 82gp 42g 104p 1.26ppg
Meier 77gp 35g 76p .987ppg
Huberdeau 80gp 30g 115p 1.43ppg
Bratt 76gp 26g 73p .96ppg

if anything Bratt Marino and the 25 1st is a weaker return for Meier than the Tkatchuk deal!



You completely ignored the first part of what I said. The reported expected of Meier among the league is less than DeBrincat’s. Find a reliable insider who is reporting the return to be much higher, and that’s a different story
21 déc. 2022 à 8 h 17
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 2,615
Mentions "j'aime": 1,079
Quoting: Kjell_Forsman
Holtz (a struggling prospect) or a late 1st? Delusion is not a good color for you. It's not even close.


Holtz is still a blue chip prospect, and hasn’t even played a full NHL season. Labeling him as struggling is a choice…
21 déc. 2022 à 8 h 22
#20
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 2,615
Mentions "j'aime": 1,079
Quoting: poeticentropy
While DeBrincat is better they're close to the same production this season, both on terrible teams. Meier brings a much more physical presence too. So agree it would be less for Meier but I don't think by much.
NJD's 1st is going to be so late so obviously Holtz is more valuable in that choice. If no 1st then maybe fulfill with more later picks or another prospect since NJ is loaded with good ones? Don't think SJ will want to trade Meier for what is being offered.


Yea I don’t see an issue filling out with B prospects like Samu Salminen, Chase Stillman etc. if that’s what would be holding it back
poeticentropy a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage