SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Karlsson no retention scenario what does edmonton need to add

Créé par: leafs101
Équipe: 2022-23 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 11 déc. 2022
Publié: 11 déc. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
EDM takes the bigger contract, but also by far the best player in the deal. They offload Campbell who is proving to be worth closer to his 1.6M contract than his 5M deal, as well Barrie and Foegle to make the cap work. An even number of contracts are swapped.

SJ doesn't get any value back for Karlsson aside from whatever they can flip half retained Barrie for, but gets a significant portion off of the books. If they can rebuild Campbell, they immediately look to flip him.

To me SJS likely declines this - they may as well retain 5M on Karlsson and get a very nice return than take on Campbell unless they think they can rebuild his play. But interesting thought nonetheless.

Maybe EDM has to add a first rounder and then it gets more interesting - consider this the base and then we can discuss what needs to be added
Transactions
1.
2.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $80 962 333 $896 000 $2 200 000 $1 537 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
798 000 $798 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
900 000 $900 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
807 500 $807 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 déc. 2022 à 17 h 45
#1
BORDEGOD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,310
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Sharks very much decline.
Riley816 a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2022 à 17 h 45
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,545
Mentions "j'aime": 4,180
Probably both teams decline.

EK is not what Edmonton needs. They need a bunch of guys who are super defensive,
11 déc. 2022 à 17 h 46
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,202
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Quoting: Kjell_Forsman
Sharks very much decline.


i agree but what would EDM need to add

because this is about one of the only scenarios I can see SJS not having to retain anything to deal Karlsson
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2022 à 18 h 7
#4
Stats Are For Losers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 2,772
Mentions "j'aime": 1,395
I think we need to consider what is an $11.5m Karlsson worth? I think that’s a super tough question.

With significant retention, he’s worth a kings ransom and at 50% he’s worth arguably more than he was traded for initially.

At $11.5m; I think his value will be in taking back a terrible contract to offset a chunk of that incoming salary and then SJ can get closer to his actual value.
leafs101 a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2022 à 18 h 18
#5
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,263
Mentions "j'aime": 9,047
Unless UPL starts stealing games, I don't think the Sabres will want to move Comrie, especially with retention
Bostonbruins a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2022 à 18 h 34
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,189
Mentions "j'aime": 3,667
Quoting: leafs101
i agree but what would EDM need to add

because this is about one of the only scenarios I can see SJS not having to retain anything to deal Karlsson


Like a 1st and Bourgault
Kjell_Forsman a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2022 à 19 h 17
#7
BORDEGOD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,310
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Quoting: leafs101
i agree but what would EDM need to add

because this is about one of the only scenarios I can see SJS not having to retain anything to deal Karlsson


Sharks would prefer to move him with retention so we can get picks and prospects back. Moving him for vets is zero sum gain.
leafs101 a aimé ceci.
11 déc. 2022 à 19 h 43
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 358
Mentions "j'aime": 89
Tough to imagine the right offer but definitely no point of unloading EK65 for the sake of cap space.

Probably Puljujarvi, Holloway, a first? for EK65 and some retention. Possibly adding in Barrie for salary purposes
leafs101 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage