SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If Ehlers is out long term

Créé par: tsyls
Équipe: 2022-23 Jets de Winnipeg
Date de création initiale: 17 nov. 2022
Publié: 17 nov. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Bowness spoke today about nothing being off the table for Ehlers. He skated yesterday but was not on the ice today and seems to have hit a snag in his recovery. He suffered a lower body injury in Mid-October, Bowness spoke about the jets needing to make a decision on him soon, which likely is whether or not he needs surgery. If he does get surgery, depending on the injury he’ll be out for a while.

The jets will have a few options while he’s out, which are to try and replace internally. This could come via a Lambert call up to play in the top 6. They could also look at adding a winger via trade. I think that is much more likely. Jets can trade from a position of strength at D for F. I think Vancouver is the ideal partner for that.
Transactions
VAN
  1. Pionk, Neal
Détails additionnels:
I’d personally move pionk over DeMelo due to contract and team need. This also opens up a spot for Heinola. Not sure what the deal would look like as I believe Pionk holds more value than garland.
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de NYR
Logo de WPG
2024
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2025
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $74 696 191 $0 $2 262 500 $7 803 809 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
900 000 $900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
DG
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
850 000 $850 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 nov. 2022 à 12 h 54
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 1,288
Mentions "j'aime": 813
That is an overpay for the Jets. I just think Van would have to add in order to get Pionk, who is playing pretty well this year
tsyls et Windjammer a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2022 à 13 h 7
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 4,825
Quoting: hwjw
That is an overpay for the Jets. I just think Van would have to add in order to get Pionk, who is playing pretty well this year


Agreed. But I wasn’t sure how much they’d have to add so I just left it until I got feedback. Pionk has been solid, jets need a spot for heinola going forward and he doesn’t replace what DeMelo brings.
hwjw a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2022 à 13 h 13
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,749
Mentions "j'aime": 7,002
Yeah, I wouldn't mind getting Garland at all, but he definitely doesn't justify moving a top 4 RHD on a good contract. I also can't see the Jets moving one of their 2 RD. An LD sure, not RD.
17 nov. 2022 à 13 h 27
#4
Jetsfan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 7,985
Mentions "j'aime": 2,589
Send Schmidt back. As much as I like him as a guy, he is the only one that is expendable.

We need Dillon's size and we need Demelo and Pionk RHS
17 nov. 2022 à 13 h 28
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 1,288
Mentions "j'aime": 813
Quoting: Jetman
Send Schmidt back. As much as I like him as a guy, he is the only one that is expendable.

We need Dillon's size and we need Demelo and Pionk RHS


Van isn't trading back for Nate haha
tsyls a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2022 à 13 h 38
#6
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,654
Mentions "j'aime": 12,372
I wonder if DeMelo+ would get Garland, would rather keep Pionk though I understand you've gotta give to get.

Personally I think they should just run with what they got, give Harkins a good long look with legit top 6 talent and top 6 time and see what he can do, a sink or swim moment which they've never really given him.

Maybe pick up some depth off waivers or sign some vet to a league minimum contract to fill out the 4th line/13th forward, a guy like Alex Chiasson is still without a contract I believe.

Should've signed Victor Rask, Galchenyuk or someone like that to a league minimum deal.
tsyls a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2022 à 13 h 41
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 4,825
Quoting: hwjw
Van isn't trading back for Nate haha


Nate isn’t waiving his NTC for that either lol.

Quoting: Windjammer
Yeah, I wouldn't mind getting Garland at all, but he definitely doesn't justify moving a top 4 RHD on a good contract. I also can't see the Jets moving one of their 2 RD. An LD sure, not RD.


Jets won’t be able to move Schmidt. Dillon is needed on the backend as no one else has his intangibles. That leaves DeMelo or Pionk to be moved. DeMelo is needed on the PK and is a stabilizing force. Which lead me to move pionk. That also opens up a spot for Heinola on the pp which is what Bowness said was holding him back.

Quoting: Jetman
Send Schmidt back. As much as I like him as a guy, he is the only one that is expendable.

We need Dillon's size and we need Demelo and Pionk RHS


Good luck moving that contract and Nate isn’t waiving for Vancouver.
17 nov. 2022 à 13 h 42
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 4,825
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
I wonder if DeMelo+ would get Garland, would rather keep Pionk though I understand you've gotta give to get.

Personally I think they should just run with what they got, give Harkins a good long look with legit top 6 talent and top 6 time and see what he can do, a sink or swim moment which they've never really given him.

Maybe pick up some depth off waivers or sign some vet to a league minimum contract to fill out the 4th line/13th forward, a guy like Alex Chiasson is still without a contract I believe.

Should've signed Victor Rask, Galchenyuk or someone like that to a league minimum deal.


Maybe lambert gets an opportunity at some point.
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2022 à 13 h 59
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,749
Mentions "j'aime": 7,002
Quoting: tsyls
Jets won’t be able to move Schmidt. Dillon is needed on the backend as no one else has his intangibles. That leaves DeMelo or Pionk to be moved. DeMelo is needed on the PK and is a stabilizing force. Which lead me to move pionk. That also opens up a spot for Heinola on the pp which is what Bowness said was holding him back.


I appreciate why you did it, but at this point of the season and with how the Jets are playing, it just makes no sense to do it. Pionk plays a much more valuable position than Garland does and is a key player on defense. Don't get me wrong, I'd like the Jets to get Garland, I just don't see anything they'd be willing to move to get him that Vancouver would want/need.

Truthfully, again at this point of the season, I would be floored if the Jets moved any of their roster defensemen. I could see a Moose guy moving, but not one of the current top 6.
tsyls a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2022 à 14 h 14
#10
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,654
Mentions "j'aime": 12,372
Quoting: Windjammer
I appreciate why you did it, but at this point of the season and with how the Jets are playing, it just makes no sense to do it. Pionk plays a much more valuable position than Garland does and is a key player on defense. Don't get me wrong, I'd like the Jets to get Garland, I just don't see anything they'd be willing to move to get him that Vancouver would want/need.

Truthfully, again at this point of the season, I would be floored if the Jets moved any of their roster defensemen. I could see a Moose guy moving, but not one of the current top 6.


I'd move Heinola+ for Garland.
tsyls et Windjammer a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2022 à 14 h 16
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 4,825
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
I'd move Heinola+ for Garland.


Something that could totally happen, Vancouver probably wants picks/prospects in any deals right now anyways.
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2022 à 14 h 27
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,749
Mentions "j'aime": 7,002
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
I'd move Heinola+ for Garland.


Yup, that world work.
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2022 à 14 h 42
#13
Jetsfan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2017
Messages: 7,985
Mentions "j'aime": 2,589
Quoting: Windjammer
Yup, that world work.


Quoting: tsyls
Something that could totally happen, Vancouver probably wants picks/prospects in any deals right now anyways.


Quoting: MisstheWhalers
I'd move Heinola+ for Garland.


Esp if Heinola isnt playing anyways...just watch him crank tho...lol
MisstheWhalers et tsyls a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2022 à 14 h 43
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,749
Mentions "j'aime": 7,002
Quoting: Jetman
Esp if Heinola isnt playing anyways...just watch him crank tho...lol


No kidding. That would be a kick in the backside.
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
18 nov. 2022 à 11 h 25
#15
power forward
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,950
Mentions "j'aime": 607
I would move Pionk or Stanley. Our team is doing good without Stanley and moving Pionk would make room for Heinola.

I honestly don't know what's happening with Lambert at this point. The Moose aren't even playing Lambert so its probably unlikely that he gets called up at any point this season. Though I would love to see a line of Perfetti, Dubois, and Lambert sooner rather than later.

A decent trade would be Stanley for Kerfoot.
tsyls a aimé ceci.
18 nov. 2022 à 12 h 5
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 4,825
Quoting: christianyog
I would move Pionk or Stanley. Our team is doing good without Stanley and moving Pionk would make room for Heinola.

I honestly don't know what's happening with Lambert at this point. The Moose aren't even playing Lambert so its probably unlikely that he gets called up at any point this season. Though I would love to see a line of Perfetti, Dubois, and Lambert sooner rather than later.

A decent trade would be Stanley for Kerfoot.


I like the kerfoot for Stanley deal, although moving pionk makes room for Heinola.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage