SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Big mix up Im new

Créé par: KanuckingYouOut
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 17 nov. 2022
Publié: 17 nov. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Athanasiou, Andreas (500 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
2.
VAN
  1. Khudobin, Anton
  2. Studenic, Marian
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (DAL)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
  6. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
DAL
  1. Demko, Thatcher (1 000 000 $ retained)
3.
4.
VAN
  1. Johnson, Erik
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (COL)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (COL)
  4. Choix de 7e ronde en 2025 (COL)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de PIT
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
Logo de DAL
Logo de COL
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de COL
Logo de VAN
Logo de DAL
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2582 500 000 $78 293 750 $1 250 000 $2 082 500 $4 206 250 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 nov. 2022 à 8 h 13
#1
GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 3,912
Mentions "j'aime": 1,745
DAL have their starter goalie, so don't know why they would be interested in that?
remowilliams, GMBL et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2022 à 8 h 25
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,170
Mentions "j'aime": 286
Why would the Kings do this trade? There is no benefit for them taking on those scraps and giving up two good forwards
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2022 à 8 h 42
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,699
Mentions "j'aime": 3,017
I doubt Erik Johnson would waive for Vancouver, but sure I guess I’d accept that if I’m Colorado. Not sure why Vancouver would do it though.
17 nov. 2022 à 9 h 3
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,721
Mentions "j'aime": 5,960
Hawks aren't buying at this season. You can have AA for a third though.
OldNYIfan et Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2022 à 9 h 28
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,530
Mentions "j'aime": 9,156
EJ has a no movement so he blocks that trade. COL had Dries on their team and let him walk for free and COL has need for a fringe prospect. This is a very easy no for COL considering EJ is by far the best player in the trade.
OldNYIfan et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2022 à 9 h 29
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,530
Mentions "j'aime": 9,156
Quoting: turtlemountain
I doubt Erik Johnson would waive for Vancouver, but sure I guess I’d accept that if I’m Colorado. Not sure why Vancouver would do it though.

Why would COL do that? They let Dries walk for free, EJ imo is better than Schenn and Bains is a guy.
OldNYIfan et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2022 à 10 h 28
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 2,821
Mentions "j'aime": 1,024
Quoting: Xqb15a
Why would COL do that? They let Dries walk for free, EJ imo is better than Schenn and Bains is a guy.


Because according to Vancouver fans Schenn has seemingly morphed himself into Bobby Orr
OldNYIfan, TJTwolf et Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2022 à 10 h 38
#8
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,783
Mentions "j'aime": 25,596
Mikheyev: 28 years old, under team control for three more seasons, 4-4=8 points
Pearson: 30 years old, under team control for one more season, 1-4=5 points
Vilardi: 23 years old, under team control for at least 5 more seasons, 10-5=15 points

Los Angeles wouldn't make that trade if you took out one of the two players plus the third and added your 2023 first-rounder

The Kings are VERY happy with their current forward corps -- so happy, I don't think that we'd be in the market for Boeser or Miller. Maybe Podkolzin, but our primary need right now is at LhD.
Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2022 à 11 h 14
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 102
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Mikheyev: 28 years old, under team control for three more seasons, 4-4=8 points
Pearson: 30 years old, under team control for one more season, 1-4=5 points
Vilardi: 23 years old, under team control for at least 5 more seasons, 10-5=15 points

Los Ang

The Kings are VERY happy with their current forward corps -- so happy, I don't think that we'd be in the market for Boeser or Miller. Maybe Podkolzin, but our primary need right now is at LhD.


eles wouldn't make that trade if you took out one of the two players plus the third and added your 2023 first-rounder

You 100% enjoy painting in your spare time, give it a rest Mr Statistician
17 nov. 2022 à 11 h 56
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,699
Mentions "j'aime": 3,017
Quoting: Xqb15a
Why would COL do that? They let Dries walk for free, EJ imo is better than Schenn and Bains is a guy.


Cap savings to make a bigger move, Dries could be a call up (been there before, ugh), and maybe they like Bains? Idk.

It’s not a splashy move for Colorado so I don’t really care either way. But for Vancouver it doesn’t make any sense.

From an off ice perspective, Erik Johnson is not getting traded so this whole thing is moot. He’s a huge piece of the locker room and has trade protection.
Xqb15a et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2022 à 13 h 47
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,530
Mentions "j'aime": 9,156
Quoting: turtlemountain
Cap savings to make a bigger move, Dries could be a call up (been there before, ugh), and maybe they like Bains? Idk.

It’s not a splashy move for Colorado so I don’t really care either way. But for Vancouver it doesn’t make any sense.

From an off ice perspective, Erik Johnson is not getting traded so this whole thing is moot. He’s a huge piece of the locker room and has trade protection.


EJ is a locker room leader, moving him for cap space particularly when they are playing Andreas Englund on d would not be well received in the locker room. But yeah EJ blocks so it’s moot.
TJTwolf, Fox_Czar_Cup et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage