SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

trouba needs to be placed on LTIR while he fully heals

Créé par: RussianRangers9
Équipe: 2022-23 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 16 nov. 2022
Publié: 16 nov. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
trouba has had a nagging injury the whole season and hasnt had time to rest so ltir for a time being
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Klingberg, John (3 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Jones, Zachary
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
2.
NYR
  1. Domi, Max
  2. Kane, Patrick (5 250 000 $ retained)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
CHI
  1. Blais, Samuel
  2. Kravtsov, Vitali
  3. Reaves, Ryan
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (DAL)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
  6. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (COL)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de TBL
Logo de ANA
Logo de NYR
Logo de WPG
Logo de NYR
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2082 500 000 $68 903 969 $0 $3 700 000 $13 596 031 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
-2 625 000 $-2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
0 $0 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance50 000 $$50K)
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 nov. 2022 à 13 h 51
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,743
Mentions "j'aime": 12,125
Going to need a 1st imo for Klingberg 50% retained
16 nov. 2022 à 13 h 58
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 20
Mentions "j'aime": 3
That powerplay 1 is nuts. That's too much to pay for a rental
16 nov. 2022 à 13 h 58
#3
Démarrer sujet
RussianRangers39
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 2,105
Mentions "j'aime": 354
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Going to need a 1st imo for Klingberg 50% retained


my logic behind the trade is that your team is not a playoff team and you guys need young prospects/players. jones has offensive top 4 upside like what klingberg is but on the left side. your right side on d is better than left so it meets a need. also the 2nd is thrown in to help elevate the value. from what i see, value is close
16 nov. 2022 à 14 h 0
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,743
Mentions "j'aime": 12,125
Quoting: RussianRangers9
my logic behind the trade is that your team is not a playoff team and you guys need young prospects/players. jones has offensive top 4 upside like what klingberg is but on the left side. your right side on d is better than left so it meets a need. also the 2nd is thrown in to help elevate the value. from what i see, value is close


Ever heard of Olen Zellweger or Pavel Mintyukov? We are set there so Jones doesn’t push the needle imo
16 nov. 2022 à 14 h 2
#5
Démarrer sujet
RussianRangers39
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 2,105
Mentions "j'aime": 354
Quoting: GeneralLandro
Ever heard of Olen Zellweger or Pavel Mintyukov? We are set there so Jones doesn’t push the needle imo


jones has higher value than both those players from all i could find. with all respect to zellweger, his upside is equivalent to jones but mintyukov is below that. it is 2 fans of different franchises trying to make a trade about prospects so we will never be fully accurate. i dont mean any disrespect
16 nov. 2022 à 14 h 5
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,743
Mentions "j'aime": 12,125
Quoting: RussianRangers9
jones has higher value than both those players from all i could find. with all respect to zellweger, his upside is equivalent to jones but mintyukov is below that. it is 2 fans of different franchises trying to make a trade about prospects so we will never be fully accurate. i dont mean any disrespect


I understand and I wasn’t trying to be condescending with the ever heard of em

Zellweger and Mintyukov both have legit top 4 potential and with my boy Cam Fowler under contract for multiple years as well makes Jones no make sense unless we turn and flip him
RussianRangers9 et CHAR a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2022 à 14 h 6
#7
Démarrer sujet
RussianRangers39
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 2,105
Mentions "j'aime": 354
Quoting: GeneralLandro
I understand and I wasn’t trying to be condescending with the ever heard of em

Zellweger and Mintyukov both have legit top 4 potential and with my boy Cam Fowler under contract for multiple years as well makes Jones no make sense unless we turn and flip him


i wasnt calling you condescending, no worries. cam fowler is great and i wish we took him over mclirrath years ago. if both of those guys ban out, then all is well. value might be there but the need for the trade isnt
GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2022 à 14 h 43
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
that isnt how LTIR works
16 nov. 2022 à 14 h 46
#9
Démarrer sujet
RussianRangers39
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 2,105
Mentions "j'aime": 354
Quoting: coga16
that isnt how LTIR works


he has an injury but is playing through it. if he "cannot" play then he has to sit for at least 10 nhl games or 24 days. do this after the tdl for the remained of the season
16 nov. 2022 à 14 h 49
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: RussianRangers9
he has an injury but is playing through it. if he "cannot" play then he has to sit for at least 10 nhl games or 24 days. do this after the tdl for the remained of the season


If hes cleared medically you cant just let him sit there on LTIR, you have to activate a player once healthy. The NHL reviews the medical records...rest for a naggigng issue isnt LTIR worthy

You cant cheat LTIR despite what people think or claim bc they didnt like how the lightning timed it out.
RussianRangers9 et Dan_the_Man a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2022 à 14 h 58
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,047
Mentions "j'aime": 742
Quoting: RussianRangers9
jones has higher value than both those players from all i could find. with all respect to zellweger, his upside is equivalent to jones but mintyukov is below that.


I think you are under rating Mintyukov a fair bit but that's not super important. The fact that we can sit here and have a serious debate about which of the three prospects is best and there isn't any clear cut answer probably means the kids are close enough that it doesn't matter. The bottom line is it's really hard to make a case that the Ducks need to acquire another LHD to add to the list of those that they already have.

Rangers have more than couple forwards that are super interesting. Cuylle for one.
RussianRangers9 a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2022 à 14 h 58
#12
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,133
Mentions "j'aime": 6,903
Quoting: RussianRangers9
i wasnt calling you condescending, no worries. cam fowler is great and i wish we took him over mclirrath years ago. if both of those guys ban out, then all is well. value might be there but the need for the trade isnt


We appreciate you opened with you top LD prospect, but as mentioned, we do have several rounds in the chamber for offensive LD, and we are of the opinion that both Mintyukov and Zellwegger are better prospects. We still have one of the top 5 prospect systems in the league after graduating Zegras, Drysdale, and McTavish.

You would also be hard pressed to convince someone that Jones is a "first round piece" at present, which is what we are expecting for Klingberg with 50% retention. I personally think the team needs a left shot power forward with top line potential, if you have one of those bouncing around in your system, or a young roster player who is going to price themselves off the team next season that fits the bill, that would be something of interest to us.
RussianRangers9 a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2022 à 15 h 3
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 2,819
Mentions "j'aime": 1,024
Quoting: coga16
If hes cleared medically you cant just let him sit there on LTIR, you have to activate a player once healthy. The NHL reviews the medical records...rest for a naggigng issue isnt LTIR worthy

You cant cheat LTIR despite what people think or claim bc they didnt like how the lightning timed it out.


Yeah that was beautiful timing but fell exactly in the recovery timeline of Point and Gourde. Both of whom had the same surgery by the same surgeon the 2 previous off seasons.
16 nov. 2022 à 15 h 6
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: Dan_the_Man
Yeah that was beautiful timing but fell exactly in the recovery timeline of Point and Gourde. Both of whom had the same surgery by the same surgeon the 2 previous off seasons.


never had an issue with the lighting using the surgery timelines to their advantage. They used the system that was in place for them, simple as that.
I just cant stand other fan baes claiming they cheated bc 18m over the cap. There is no conspiracy, they played by the rules in front of them and 31 other teams could have done the same thing.
RussianRangers9 et Dan_the_Man a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2022 à 15 h 9
#15
Démarrer sujet
RussianRangers39
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 2,105
Mentions "j'aime": 354
Quoting: coga16
never had an issue with the lighting using the surgery timelines to their advantage. They used the system that was in place for them, simple as that.
I just cant stand other fan baes claiming they cheated bc 18m over the cap. There is no conspiracy, they played by the rules in front of them and 31 other teams could have done the same thing.


exactly. not saying they did. just trying to somehow replicate
16 nov. 2022 à 15 h 14
#16
Seiders on the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 9,890
Mentions "j'aime": 7,764
Quoting: RussianRangers9
my logic behind the trade is that your team is not a playoff team and you guys need young prospects/players. jones has offensive top 4 upside like what klingberg is but on the left side. your right side on d is better than left so it meets a need. also the 2nd is thrown in to help elevate the value. from what i see, value is close


I think Verbeek saw an opportunity with Klingberg. Sign him to a 1 year deal which works for the player. Acquire a first round pick (plus more see the Ben Chiarot Florida trade at last season's trade deadline). There's always a risk of injury though. I can remember when Red Wings fans thought Holland would get a 1st for Mike Green. He got injured a couple weeks before the trade deadline. They ended up trading him a year later for much less.
16 nov. 2022 à 15 h 14
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
Quoting: RussianRangers9
exactly. not saying they did. just trying to somehow replicate


if he was legit injured and required surgery etc, yeah this works,
but based on the description of just rest. That will get rejected by the NHLs medical review pretty quickly
Dan_the_Man a aimé ceci.
16 nov. 2022 à 15 h 28
#18
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,133
Mentions "j'aime": 6,903
Quoting: MoreHitzSeider
I think Verbeek saw an opportunity with Klingberg. Sign him to a 1 year deal which works for the player. Acquire a first round pick (plus more see the Ben Chiarot Florida trade at last season's trade deadline). There's always a risk of injury though. I can remember when Red Wings fans thought Holland would get a 1st for Mike Green. He got injured a couple weeks before the trade deadline. They ended up trading him a year later for much less.


I suspect he is gone in January, not March. Without Drysdale in the lineup to mentor, there's no reason to hang onto him as long as possible.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage