Quoting: vikhodush
Comps that you were begging for are in the various threads. The ones that have your opinions that you think are facts and data points. Also included context for ya since you can’t grasp that concept. Like I said tho, reading comprehension must not be your strong suit. That or you’re just a troll. If it’s the latter good work, I fed ya!
Didn’t realize when I was agreeing with somebody I had to refute them with more specific data points? That doesn’t seem logical but most of your points and opinions aren’t so that’s not a huge surprise. It’s kind of funny that you don’t take contract value and team control into account with how clearly brilliant and superior you are to everyone on here.
Enjoy your night little man!
So your comparisons are data points? You mean the comparisons where you compared Giroux trade to this? You mean the one where i provided stats about how your "top prospect" only had 14 points in 42 games? Where I clearly stated that that trade was clearly drastically different than what we are talking about here? That trade?
Or the other trade where I talked about Brandon Hagels production and how he was so valuable because he had term on a cheap deal?
Or how Dvorak was coming off of a 25 goal pace season in Arizona so he got overrated into being considered a 30+ goal scorer on a real team?
Just so you can see it all again, here is what I said... exactly:
\1. Tippett isnt a top prospect, He was 23 at the time and had 14 points in 42 games.
2. Cherry picked reasoning when I said that I like Wahlstrom but he isnt worth 10 picks? How so? I was making the point that starting a statement with "I just like {Insert name}" means nothing
3. A first and two 2nds isnt close to what Debrincat got. He got 7th OVR, 39OVR and a future early 3rd. Lindholmd got a mid to late 1st, and two mid to late seconds along with a cap dump and an unproven defenseman who has close to no trade value.
4. I dont understand what you are talking about in regards to the "A first, second & a Bish prospect is again pretty close to the Cat return, and yet again it was for 3 months of service." Id love for you to tell me know, I just dont know what you are referring to
5. Dvorak got a late 1st and 2nd, coming off of a 25 goal pace season on Arizona. media overhyped him up but the Habs were coming off of a cup run and wanted to bolster their center depth.
6. Hagel. This is the first comp that I understand. What I will say is that the two "prospects" dont really mean much, they probably are worth about what the two 4th round picks going the other way are worth. So Hagel for about two late first rounders. While yes it was an overpay, hagel is making like 1.5 million with a bit of term and to a team who is so tight against the cap, that is priceless. He is a very solid middle 6 guy who is not even in his prime yet.
I countered all of your points. I know that you are going to disagree with me just for the sake of disagreement, but the debrincat trade just wasnt an outlier. A top 10 pick, top 40 pick and top 70 pick is the best that they could get. There were upwards of 10 teams going after Debrincat, there is no way that the hawks took this over better offers
EDITQUOTEMULTI-QUOTE
So I never claimed that my opinoos were facts, mu FACTS were facts. Stating that Dvorak was on a bad team and people and media thought that he would do better elsewhere is a fact.
Tampa being tight to the cap is a fact
owen tippet being a 23 year old who had 14 points in 42 games is a fact. You claimed he was a top prospect when he was not. So your opinion was not a fact. You can think that, but there are no facts to back that up.
Understand now? Or are you going to keep gaslighting?
This is all very simple stuff