SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Is there an universe where this team sneaks in the playoffs

Créé par: Yoo
Équipe: 2022-23 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 9 août 2022
Publié: 9 août 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de COL
Logo de ANA
Logo de MIN
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2025
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $55 357 917 $0 $4 200 000 $27 142 083 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
425 000 $425 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
762 500 $762 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 août 2022 à 21 h 4
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,101
Mentions "j'aime": 1,688
1.zegras 80 points
2.terry 40 goals
3.drysdsle is an above average too 4 d man
4.Gibson is a vezina finalist

These four things happen and there’s a shot
Yoo a aimé ceci.
9 août 2022 à 21 h 6
#2
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 7,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,852
That left side of defense won't cut it.
Yoo et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
9 août 2022 à 21 h 54
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 278
Mentions "j'aime": 27
I don't think so. Their best trait seems to be offensive talent, but the problem is the average offense in the league right now is pretty damn good. They don't have anyone guaranteed to hit PPG, so while Terry and Zegras are exciting players, ultimately their difference makers don't stand out. Klingberg might give them a 50 point defenseman they didn't have last year, but these short money making deals haven't exactly worked out (Hall, Barrie). It can be difficult to play your best if you play for yourself and not for the team, kinda having 1 foot out the door already knowing you want to sign somewhere else when teams have cap space. I guess could go either way, but yeah.

I suspect they're going to have some problems with team defense as well. Quite a few guys weak in their own end. Last year they still had Lindholm and Manson as shutdown people and Getzlaf for veteran leadership. This years team is more like a team that can make some nice plays but probably give up more than they score. I still think Gibson is a great goalie but he hasn't been able to carry this team for a full season in a while.

I see a .500 pts pct team that could dip further in their record at the end if they mail it in. So basically around similar finish as last year.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
9 août 2022 à 22 h 39
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,382
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Can it? Sure. You have two young high end forwards and a similar d who can explode into super stars. You have a goalie who used to be top few in the league who is young enough to bounce back.

But most likely? Nah. Likely a fun year with enough future in the line up to get excited, but also a significant number of painful nights.

Also that left d is weak ...
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
9 août 2022 à 22 h 47
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,518
Mentions "j'aime": 25,401
No. I'm a realist, and as much as I like the future of this team, I don't see us making the playoffs even in our division. Edmonton and Los Angeles are clearly better, Calgary looks like it will survive losing both Gaudreau and Tkachuk, and San Jose and Seattle are no longer the patsies that would enable us to fatten up our W-L ratio to sneak into a wild card slot. This will be a learning year for both the kids on the ice and the front office as it evaluates our developing talent. I'll be happy if Strome and Vatrano settle in to their new surroundings, Comtois recovers his form and Zegras, Terry, Drysdale and McTavish continue their upward path.
9 août 2022 à 22 h 52
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
I don't see why not. Talented enough to keep games interesting few injuries within division sure. Gibson would have to stand on his head to have further success.
9 août 2022 à 23 h 7
#7
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,899
Quoting: NickC1988
That left side of defense won't cut it.


The left D is better than the right D. But the whole D core is the reason they won’t make it.
10 août 2022 à 0 h 44
#8
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 7,002
Mentions "j'aime": 2,852
Quoting: Jah1722
The left D is better than the right D. But the whole D core is the reason they won’t make it.


I'm not sure, Vaak is a 7D on a lot of teams. Both him and Benoit aren't experienced enough. At least Klingberg is good for 40+ points, even though he's a huge liability.
10 août 2022 à 1 h 18
#9
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,899
Quoting: NickC1988
I'm not sure, Vaak is a 7D on a lot of teams. Both him and Benoit aren't experienced enough. At least Klingberg is good for 40+ points, even though he's a huge liability.


Fowler is a legit top 4 guy on any team. Klingberg is an offense first top 4 guy. Everyone else is replacement level or worse. Obviously there’s room to grow for them all (minus shattenkirk of course). Fowler being the best D means the left side is better.

Anyways I just wanted to point out that Fowler is actually pretty good and doesn’t get enough credit for it. Overall this D core will probably be the biggest reason this team isn’t a playoff team yet and that’s okay for where they’re at in the rebuild.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage