SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Add some d

Créé par: Theozler
Équipe: 2022-23 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 18 juill. 2022
Publié: 19 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
32 500 000 $
11 300 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 200 000 $
Transactions
COL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (OTT)
Détails additionnels:
Top 5 protected
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NSH
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de WSH
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $82 359 881 $0 $4 025 000 $140 119 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
RFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
762 500 $762 500 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 juill. 2022 à 17 h 36
#1
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 45,158
Mentions "j'aime": 25,626
I don’t think they’ll take 5 mill straight in cap. But I could see this looking more like Brannstrom + Formenton going the other way
NMAvsFan a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2022 à 17 h 38
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,155
Mentions "j'aime": 417
Colorado has no use for draft picks at this point in their contention window. While Girard makes a TON of sense for Ott, I'm not sure Ott has anything that really makes sense for Colorado atm, which would have to be an NHL ready 2c that is cost controlled. Pinto isn't quite there.
NMAvsFan et Foppa21 a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2022 à 17 h 42
#3
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 45,158
Mentions "j'aime": 25,626
Quoting: Meeqs
Colorado has no use for draft picks at this point in their contention window. While Girard makes a TON of sense for Ott, I'm not sure Ott has anything that really makes sense for Colorado atm, which would have to be an NHL ready 2c that is cost controlled. Pinto isn't quite there.


Pinto would def not be moved for Girard. He’d be the 2C this year If they didn’t have a logjam. 100% nhl ready and elite defensively
19 juill. 2022 à 17 h 44
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,529
Mentions "j'aime": 1,070
@csick @meeqs I'd also argue that the difference between Romanov (traded for #13 OA) and Girard isn't a 2nd round pick. He'll be more expensive.
Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2022 à 17 h 45
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,118
Mentions "j'aime": 1,689
Quoting: Meeqs
Colorado has no use for draft picks at this point in their contention window. While Girard makes a TON of sense for Ott, I'm not sure Ott has anything that really makes sense for Colorado atm, which would have to be an NHL ready 2c that is cost controlled. Pinto isn't quite there.


Depends on the kadri contract. If he comes in at 7 and a cheaper one year d contract, maybe butcher this could make some sense that way.
19 juill. 2022 à 17 h 49
#6
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 45,158
Mentions "j'aime": 25,626
Quoting: Foppa21
csick meeqs I'd also argue that the difference between Romanov (traded for #13 OA) and Girard isn't a 2nd round pick. He'll be more expensive.


Highest I would go is Brannstrom/Formenton and a protected 1st
19 juill. 2022 à 17 h 50
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,155
Mentions "j'aime": 417
Quoting: csick
Pinto would def not be moved for Girard. He’d be the 2C this year If they didn’t have a logjam. 100% nhl ready and elite defensively


Whatever you say there bud.
19 juill. 2022 à 17 h 51
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,155
Mentions "j'aime": 417
Quoting: Theozler
Depends on the kadri contract. If he comes in at 7 and a cheaper one year d contract, maybe butcher this could make some sense that way.


The Kadri contract is a lot more irrelevant to Girard than the average fan on here believes. In either circumstance though, Ott still doesn't have the assets that Col would be looking for.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2022 à 17 h 51
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,739
Mentions "j'aime": 3,583
Quoting: csick
Highest I would go is Brannstrom/Formenton and a protected 1st


Not too bad. Grieg instead of Formenton a deal breaker for you? And regardless of your answer to the first question, how protected are we talking? I think having a 2023 pick would be pretty important. Top 5? Top 10?
Foppa21 a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2022 à 17 h 52
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,155
Mentions "j'aime": 417
Quoting: csick
Highest I would go is Brannstrom/Formenton and a protected 1st


Oh man, a bust, a winger the Avs don't need that might be involved in a SA case and a 1st that does nothing for them? How could they say no?

[see my original post]
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2022 à 17 h 54
#11
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 45,158
Mentions "j'aime": 25,626
Quoting: Meeqs
Oh man, a bust, a winger the Avs don't need that might be involved in a SA case and a 1st that does nothing for them? How could they say no?

[see my original post]


Well they’ll only move him if they wanna clear cap space. So they’ll have to take minimal cap back.

Formenton-Newhook-Lehkonen would be one of the best 3rd lines in the league
19 juill. 2022 à 17 h 55
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,529
Mentions "j'aime": 1,070
Quoting: csick
Highest I would go is Brannstrom/Formenton and a protected 1st


If it's all three, then I could see it happening. Just two of those pieces? Then I'm probably out.
19 juill. 2022 à 17 h 56
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,155
Mentions "j'aime": 417
Quoting: csick
Well they’ll only move him if they wanna clear cap space. So they’ll have to take minimal cap back.

Formenton-Newhook-Lehkonen would be one of the best 3rd lines in the league


Sometimes its best to not post something and have the world guess that you don't know what you're talking about rather than to make a post that proves it
19 juill. 2022 à 17 h 56
#14
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 45,158
Mentions "j'aime": 25,626
Quoting: Foppa21
If it's all three, then I could see it happening. Just two of those pieces? Then I'm probably out.


I would offer all 3 if you could convince me that Girard can play the right side well and isn’t soft defensively
19 juill. 2022 à 17 h 57
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 10,493
Mentions "j'aime": 5,009
No logical deal to be made with OTT from the Avs PoV. They simply don't have the pieces the Avs would want/need.
19 juill. 2022 à 18 h 2
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,529
Mentions "j'aime": 1,070
Quoting: csick
I would offer all 3 if you could convince me that Girard can play the right side well and isn’t soft defensively


I mean, he was a norris contender for a reason in '20-'21. As for playing right side, it's obviously not his dominant side but he can play it well enough.
csick et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2022 à 18 h 9
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,739
Mentions "j'aime": 3,583
Quoting: csick
I would offer all 3 if you could convince me that Girard can play the right side well and isn’t soft defensively


Quoting: Foppa21
I mean, he was a norris contender for a reason in '20-'21. As for playing right side, it's obviously not his dominant side but he can play it well enough.


He was playing his off side most of that year, so he may be better on the right than the left.

Brannstrom, Grieg, 1st gets me thinking. Honestly though, I don't think they trade him at this time.
Foppa21 a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2022 à 18 h 12
#18
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 45,158
Mentions "j'aime": 25,626
Quoting: TJTwolf
No logical deal to be made with OTT from the Avs PoV. They simply don't have the pieces the Avs would want/need.


What would Colorado even need?
19 juill. 2022 à 18 h 17
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 10,493
Mentions "j'aime": 5,009
Quoting: csick
What would Colorado even need?


2C basically. That's why I don't see a logical fit.
19 juill. 2022 à 18 h 18
#20
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 45,158
Mentions "j'aime": 25,626
Quoting: TJTwolf
2C basically. That's why I don't see a logical fit.


I can’t see any team giving up a cost reasonable 2C for Girard
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2022 à 18 h 25
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 10,493
Mentions "j'aime": 5,009
Quoting: csick
I can’t see any team giving up a cost reasonable 2C for Girard


No, not one for one I agree. The deal would likely be larger but based around Girard for 2C with parts added. Taking Lindholm as an idea from another thread. Lindholm plus pick/prospect for Girard & Newhook (as Newhook would no longer be essential to retain) as an example if Calgary were to 'blow it up' and go into a rebuild (retool?). Both players they acquire would be young enough for that.
csick a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2022 à 18 h 25
#22
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 45,158
Mentions "j'aime": 25,626
Quoting: TJTwolf
No, not one for one I agree. The deal would likely be larger but based around Girard for 2C with parts added. Taking Lindholm as an idea from another thread. Lindholm plus pick/prospect for Girard & Newhook (as Newhook would no longer be essential to retain) as an example if Calgary were to 'blow it up' and go into a rebuild (retool?). Both players they acquire would be young enough for that.


Yeah I could see that tbh. That’s a good idea
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
19 juill. 2022 à 20 h 38
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 3,904
Mentions "j'aime": 1,009
Quoting: Meeqs
Colorado has no use for draft picks at this point in their contention window. While Girard makes a TON of sense for Ott, I'm not sure Ott has anything that really makes sense for Colorado atm, which would have to be an NHL ready 2c that is cost controlled. Pinto isn't quite there.


Not true, picks are very valuable and can be used for further trades!
Anus_McLeod a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage