SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fun Trades

Équipe: 2022-23 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 23 juin 2022
Publié: 23 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
21 000 000 $
2800 000 $
2800 000 $
1950 000 $
44 250 000 $
22 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
35 000 000 $
25 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Couture, Logan (2 000 000 $ retained)
SJS
  1. Mittelstadt, Casey
  2. Portillo, Erik [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (PHI)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
2.
BUF
  1. Bear, Ethan [Droits de RFA]
CAR
  1. Girgensons, Zemgus
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
3.
BUF
  1. Kerins, Rory
  2. Monahan, Sean (1 000 000 $ retained)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
Cap clear
CGY
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de BUF
Logo de FLA
Logo de VGK
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de NJD
Logo de BUF
Logo de CGY
Logo de BUF
Logo de DAL
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de VGK
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de CGY
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $68 810 000 $0 $3 120 000 $13 690 000 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 375 000 $5 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
800 000 $800 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
950 000 $950 000 $
C, AG
RFA
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Unités spéciales

Avantage numérique 1
 
 
 
 

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 juin 2022 à 20 h 10
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,184
Mentions "j'aime": 3,664
Take out the retention and sharks probably still don’t do it
Bias_it_self a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 20 h 10
#2
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,355
Mentions "j'aime": 10,683
Flames easily decline. 118 points in the OHL in 67 games isn't getting traded anytime soon. Also Flames won't retain a cent
23 juin 2022 à 20 h 12
#3
Démarrer sujet
Amateur GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 880
Mentions "j'aime": 112
Quoting: glarson17
Take out the retention and sharks probably still don’t do it


Lol Sharks fans posted that exact trade on my last one and said my other proposal was too unfair in the Sharks favor
23 juin 2022 à 20 h 13
#4
Démarrer sujet
Amateur GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 880
Mentions "j'aime": 112
Quoting: Gmonwy
Flames easily decline. 118 points in the OHL in 67 games isn't getting traded anytime soon. Also Flames won't retain a cent


Have to give to get. Fine dont retain.
23 juin 2022 à 20 h 14
#5
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,675
Mentions "j'aime": 3,487
Canes have no need, want, or even interest in Girgensons. Doesn’t play a positional need, and would only block prospects from making the jump, like J. Drury. Not to mention, Drury is cheaper and ultimately will probably be better in the long run.
23 juin 2022 à 20 h 15
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
Monahan isn't gonna cost a 2nd+good prospect to dump with retention. He probably won't cost anything at all to dump at full cost honestly. If I told you a 27yo centre with 7 20+ goal seasons (and 3 30+ goal seasons) was available for 1 year, and has had some injury concerns but projects to be healthy for training camp, there are probably a few teams that would be willing to take a chance on that, given that there's next to no risk for a team near the floor, and the upside is you get the top 6 centre back, who is either still young enough to be worth holding onto for a few years if it's a good fit, or would bring in a nice haul at the TDL if he bounces back. Monahan's just had this stigma attached to him because he had a "down" season where he played most of it injured and without consistent linemates (like it was a rotating cast of Nordstrom, Ritchie, Leivo, Simon, etc. all of whom suck) that I just really don't understand
23 juin 2022 à 20 h 18
#7
Démarrer sujet
Amateur GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 880
Mentions "j'aime": 112
Quoting: evelutions2
Canes have no need, want, or even interest in Girgensons. Doesn’t play a positional need, and would only block prospects from making the jump, like J. Drury. Not to mention, Drury is cheaper and ultimately will probably be better in the long run.


He brings some grit and vet presence to bottom six
23 juin 2022 à 20 h 21
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,184
Mentions "j'aime": 3,664
Quoting: Sabresfuturecupwinners
Lol Sharks fans posted that exact trade on my last one and said my other proposal was too unfair in the Sharks favor


Sharks aren’t retaining $10 mil for a boarder line 3C, a goalie who will be a ufa after the year and those picks.
23 juin 2022 à 20 h 23
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,184
Mentions "j'aime": 3,664
Quoting: Alfie11
Monahan isn't gonna cost a 2nd+good prospect to dump with retention. He probably won't cost anything at all to dump at full cost honestly. If I told you a 27yo centre with 7 20+ goal seasons (and 3 30+ goal seasons) was available for 1 year, and has had some injury concerns but projects to be healthy for training camp, there are probably a few teams that would be willing to take a chance on that, given that there's next to no risk for a team near the floor, and the upside is you get the top 6 centre back, who is either still young enough to be worth holding onto for a few years if it's a good fit, or would bring in a nice haul at the TDL if he bounces back. Monahan's just had this stigma attached to him because he had a "down" season where he played most of it injured and without consistent linemates (like it was a rotating cast of Nordstrom, Ritchie, Leivo, Simon, etc. all of whom suck) that I just really don't understand


They aren’t injury concerns, they are bona fide injuries. Surgery on both hips is no joke he isn’t getting any better after those and at best he puts up 2/3 the production he used to
23 juin 2022 à 20 h 24
#10
Démarrer sujet
Amateur GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 880
Mentions "j'aime": 112
Quoting: glarson17
Sharks aren’t retaining $10 mil for a boarder line 3C, a goalie who will be a ufa after the year and those picks.


Tell that to every Sharks fan on my prior post who said it was a fair trade
23 juin 2022 à 20 h 25
#11
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,675
Mentions "j'aime": 3,487
Quoting: Sabresfuturecupwinners
He brings some grit and vet presence to bottom six


That’s the problem. Canes already have enough players for the bottom 6, with a couple others down in Chicago that should be with the Canes if it weren’t for the depth the Canes have. They need more top 6 scoring, a pure goal scorer being the ideal route, and Girgs doesn’t provide that. It’s a pointless addition, and it’s one that would hurt the Canes more than actually help them.
23 juin 2022 à 20 h 39
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,559
Mentions "j'aime": 5,044
Quoting: evelutions2
Canes have no need, want, or even interest in Girgensons. Doesn’t play a positional need, and would only block prospects from making the jump, like J. Drury. Not to mention, Drury is cheaper and ultimately will probably be better in the long run.


Honestly, I'm not sure Drury isn't better than Girgensens now. Drury is a goal a game at the NHL level you know /s

On a serious note, watching him with the Wolves, the kid is... I wanna say the real deal but it feels wrong when he's playing most of the Calder Cup Finals series against James Neal. You get what I mean
23 juin 2022 à 22 h 14
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,575
Mentions "j'aime": 19,706
Absurd overpay to move Monahan
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage