Quoting: NDoody
Same OTT should say no, That contract isn't going to age well and becomes a real problem with Norris, Stuzle, Sanderson, and others who need long-term deals.
As well there will be a top 6 winger available at 7th overall this summer who likely only needs one year in the AHL.
Fiala would only be 32 by the time that contract was over. He'd only be just going into the downswing of his prime. How is getting all of a player's prime years just as your team is taking the next step and reaching for a playoff spot and ultimately contend during that same timespan not going to age well?
Gaudreau will be 7×$9-10M. Starting at 28 years old.
Forsberg will cost 7×$8-9M. Starting at 27 years old.
Giroux will cost 4-7×$7-8M. Starting at 34 years old.
Fiala will cost 5-8×$7-8M. Starting at 25 years old.
Simply put. Fiala is the youngest option available and costs the least for a player in that tier range. He's well worth the asking price in that regard. He literally carries the least amount of risk, especially in regards to potential drop off, out of any of those options.
Garland and Konecny are cheaper options with term, it's true. But they're also a clear step down in terms of ability and tier level. I don't see either of them moving the needle enough to get the Sens into the playoffs.
Furthermore, there isn't a single prospect at 7th overall that doesn't or isn't going to take at least 2-3 years before hitting the NHL. Not Kemell, not Gauthier, not Lekkerimaki, Yurov, Lambert, or Nazar. Not Savoie or Kasper either.
None of these kids are considered to be particularly close to being NHL ready this year or a year away. With the exception of Wright, Cooley, or Slafkovsky. That's it. Don't count on a prospect being picked there to be anything close to what Fiala is.