SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

No Major Moves

Créé par: Nikolai_Khabibulin
Équipe: 2022-23 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 8 juin 2022
Publié: 8 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
31 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
2950 000 $
1925 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
1800 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Mrázek, Petr
  2. Voit, Ty
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Per Athletic Report of a 2nd and Prospect being needed for the hawks to take on Mrazek.
TOR
  1. Khaira, Jujhar
Détails additionnels:
Hawks throw in Kharia for the leafs to have a possible big 4th line body who played well for the hawks before his injury and comes cheap
2.
CHI
    Change of Scenery Trade somewhere for something
    3.
    CHI
    1. Pánik, Richard
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (NYI)
    NYI
    1. Kubalik, Dominik [Droits de RFA]
    4.
    CHI
    1. Foudy, Liam [Droits de RFA]
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (CBJ)
    CBJ
    1. Strome, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
    Frais appliqués
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CHI
    2023
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    2024
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2382 500 000 $69 759 295 $237 500 $2 125 000 $12 740 705 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    758 333 $758 333 $
    AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    758 333 $758 333 $
    AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    950 000 $950 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AD, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    8 juin 2022 à 4 h 7
    #1
    19 lotteries, 0 wins
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2017
    Messages: 1,240
    Mentions "j'aime": 763
    yes
    Civil_Eng_PE a aimé ceci.
    8 juin 2022 à 9 h 6
    #2
    Nah.
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 4,543
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,486
    Quoting: AndrewPawlack
    yes


    Give 'em Bemstrom too.
    8 juin 2022 à 9 h 23
    #3
    NYI
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 3,523
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,116
    Yes from NYI.
    Nightowl26 a aimé ceci.
    8 juin 2022 à 14 h 15
    #4
    mostly harmless
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2016
    Messages: 6,928
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,421
    Quoting: AndrewPawlack
    yes

    Quoting: dopplsan
    Give 'em Bemstrom too.

    No. Hell no. Strome, like his brother, is borderline useless without an All-Star playmaking winger. As much as we all love Laine, he is very not a playmaker.
    8 juin 2022 à 14 h 28
    #5
    not a he )
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2022
    Messages: 3,360
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,684
    Quoting: Viqsi
    No. Hell no. Strome, like his brother, is borderline useless without an All-Star playmaking winger. As much as we all love Laine, he is very not a playmaker.


    He wouldn't be with Laine. He'd be with Bjorkstrand and Johnson, probably.
    8 juin 2022 à 14 h 35
    #6
    mostly harmless
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2016
    Messages: 6,928
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,421
    Quoting: squashmaple
    He wouldn't be with Laine. He'd be with Bjorkstrand and Johnson, probably.

    And he'd be dragging them down, badly. The guy can think the game well enough to be useful with someone else who draws all the attention and then gives him the puck, but even then he doesn't produce any more than someone like Jenner or Roz would - and he'd be demanding quite a bit more money than those guys. And his defensive ability makes Roz look like a two-way dynamo and Boone like a Selkie nominee. Just Say No to Strome brothers.
    8 juin 2022 à 15 h 14
    #7
    Nah.
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 4,543
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,486
    Modifié 8 juin 2022 à 15 h 21
    Quoting: Viqsi
    And he'd be dragging them down, badly. The guy can think the game well enough to be useful with someone else who draws all the attention and then gives him the puck, but even then he doesn't produce any more than someone like Jenner or Roz would - and he'd be demanding quite a bit more money than those guys. And his defensive ability makes Roz look like a two-way dynamo and Boone like a Selkie nominee. Just Say No to Strome brothers.


    idk, his underlying numbers don't seem so terrible.

    For my specific trade, Bems has no future on this team, and Foudy isn't far behind him, with how his development/ play time has been handled. We'd be moving two Fs who need to be on the NHL roster for one. Plus, I'm not going to lose sleep over a 3rd.

    CHI gets mid-rounder, and rolls the dice on two young guys who could still turn into decent/ good NHL players if given the playing time. With KJ, Marchenko, Silly, and Chinny (all of whom are still waivers exempt, mind you unlike Bems and Foudy) already ahead of those guys on the prospect totem pole, I just don't think they'll have space for Foudy or Bems.
    8 juin 2022 à 19 h 18
    #8
    mostly harmless
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2016
    Messages: 6,928
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,421
    Quoting: dopplsan
    idk, his underlying numbers don't seem so terrible.

    For my specific trade, Bems has no future on this team, and Foudy isn't far behind him, with how his development/ play time has been handled. We'd be moving two Fs who need to be on the NHL roster for one. Plus, I'm not going to lose sleep over a 3rd.

    CHI gets mid-rounder, and rolls the dice on two young guys who could still turn into decent/ good NHL players if given the playing time. With KJ, Marchenko, Silly, and Chinny (all of whom are still waivers exempt, mind you unlike Bems and Foudy) already ahead of those guys on the prospect totem pole, I just don't think they'll have space for Foudy or Bems.

    If you look carefully, you'll notice those numbers on defense are rather poor; he only makes up for it with offense, and when he's away from Kane it drops precipitously. And he's getting worse instead of better. And he costs too much regardless.

    It's not that Foudy and/or Bemstrom are vital assets at this point; it's just that Strome is arguably a negative one.
    dopplsan a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage