Landeskog is an A - was over a ppg and on pace to have career record in goals/points etc
J Johnson is a C - for league minimum, we got alot of value out of him
R Murray is a D - for 2 mil, we didnt get enough value out of him (see J Johson above)
NAK is a B - for a waiver claim 1 mil player 21pts is decent value
Sturm is creeping towards C territory for me

MacDermid is the worst player on the roster by a mile.

id make a few changes

a - landy
b -
c - girard, manson, sturm, o'connor, cogs
d - helm, ej
f - murray

Yeah but we knew he wasn’t going to be a good player, and we didn’t bring him in to be a good player. We brought him in to bring a physical edge and be a locker room guy. And he’s been good at those two things

Fair points, but idk what your expectations are for sturm. When he’s played he’s played his role well, defensive, faceoffs, size. But he could definitely use some more finish no doubt

Sturms offensive production is probably half of what id expect by now (especially given COLs offensive power).
Hes also finding the penalty box at a greater rate than he was in MIN

Burakovsky has set career highs in goal scoring assists and obviously points and he doesn’t get an A?
Compher in route to career high in goals and points and he gets a C? I’d give him a B besides the production he has filled in at a lot of roles when guys have been hurt.
Francouz as a back up goes 15-4-1 2.52 .918 & 2 shutouts and that’s average? He has been exceptional in his role as a back up and deserves a B.
LOC was awesome at the beginning, hit a long dry spell scoring but he was always good on the forecheck and pk deserves a C at the very least he has been better all season than Helm and NAK.
Girard deserves a tougher grade because by his standards he’s struggled if C+ were possible I’d give him that.
Murray Id argue almost deserves an Incomplete.

Meyers is an A, like Makar: FIRST GAME FIRST GOAL, BABY!

I totally get what your saying but he just hasn’t shown enough to be an A