SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ottawa Senators 2022-2023 Team

Créé par: jacksonclarke
Équipe: 2022-23 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 12 mars 2022
Publié: 12 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Pierre Dorion comes out and says that this team needs to compete for a playoff spot in the 2022-2023 in a media availability on March 11th, 2022. Here a roster similar to one PD must construct to make it happen. Ottawa could sign more players on one-year contracts if they wanted to make this team better, but not for the long term, as they need to sign their young players (i.e Tim Stuetzle, Jake Sanderson, etc.)

If anything else needs to get done with this roster, it is adding better veteran defencemen. I am relying too much on the addition of Jake Sanderson and the development of Jacob Bernard-Docker and Lassi Thomson to make the defense better. Erik Brannstrom is now not needed and therefore traded.

If the goaltending doesn't work out, we will be relying on Mads Sogaard to step in a play as he has in the AHL. Troy Mann, coach of the Bellville Senators, has had some high praise for the netminder so I have some trust he will work out at the NHL level.

Decision Notes:
-Nikita Zaitsev is bought out
-Olofsson Signed to bridge deal that walks him to free agency ("show me" contract)
-Andrew Copp overpaid (IMO) to come to Ottawa as a UFA
-Anton Forsberg is not brought back, Filip Gustavsson is on a one-way contract and Matt Murray has been good when he's not hurt :/
-Nick Paul wants too much money, so he is unfortunately not brought back
-MDZ traded to Arizona for a bag of pucks (hopefully a 6th gets it done)
-Ridly Greig and Parker Kelly are in and out of the lineup as seen fit

Let me know if any trades or signings are unfair or don't make sense for the team or player.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
66 500 000 $
22 500 000 $
24 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
45 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Olofsson, Victor [Droits de RFA]
BUF
  1. Brännström, Erik [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
2.
OTT
    Future Considerations
    ARI
    1. Del Zotto, Michael
    2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (OTT)
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de NYI
    2023
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de NSH
    2024
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de OTT
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2181 500 000 $66 465 713 $0 $3 950 000 $15 034 287 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
    AG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 5
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
    C
    UFA - 1
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AG
    RFA
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    762 500 $762 500 $
    AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    863 333 $863 333 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 3
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    787 500 $787 500 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    DD
    RFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    12 mars 2022 à 18 h 3
    #1
    KFTW
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 44,584
    Mentions "j'aime": 25,213
    You just signed 2 3rd line guys to play 2nd line roles. Best case scenario, acquire a Fiala or Konecny for the 2nd line , then move Pinto to 2RW and play White as 3C. Now don’t play Thomson on his off side. Only have one of JBD or Thomson on the team
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    12 mars 2022 à 18 h 4
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2021
    Messages: 7,136
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
    Sabres decline imo
    Reason 1
    -we don’t wanna “sell low” on Olofsson, we’re looking for a 1st
    Reason 2
    -Brannstrom could possibly be enough to get us to pass on needing the 1st…. EXCEPT…. he’s a LH shot defenseman, and we are LOADED on that side
    Dahlin & Owen Power are locked in as LD1 & LD2
    Then we have Samuelsson & Bryson, who have looked like they belong in the NHL, and also Ryan Johnson (former 1st round pick) looking good & coming

    We NEED a RH defenseman, not a LH guy
    sabres89 a aimé ceci.
    13 mars 2022 à 9 h 59
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 5,352
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
    When a bottom team drafts it is always wise to chose the best player available.
    So one needs to question why Buffalo is in this predicament because they drafted Power when they had Dahlin, Samuelsson and Johnson in the pipeline.
    I would accept this trade then look to flip Brännström in a trade for a young RHD.
    IMO this is a good return for Olofsson, even if it does not include a RHD.
    13 mars 2022 à 10 h 3
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2021
    Messages: 56
    Mentions "j'aime": 21
    Brannstrom is better on the right side, him and Samuelsson might make an outstanding pair.

    It's a decent return actually, but I would decline. If it was a 2022 2nd I would accept.
    13 mars 2022 à 10 h 20
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 9,508
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
    Quoting: gretzkyghosts
    When a bottom team drafts it is always wise to chose the best player available.
    So one needs to question why Buffalo is in this predicament because they drafted Power when they had Dahlin, Samuelsson and Johnson in the pipeline.
    I would accept this trade then look to flip Brännström in a trade for a young RHD.
    IMO this is a good return for Olofsson, even if it does not include a RHD.


    Who was best available?
    13 mars 2022 à 10 h 34
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 5,352
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
    Quoting: BuFfaLOFaN
    Who was best available?
    Please read my entire post.
    You picked out one part of a sentence (Buffalo is in this predicament) without understanding the entire context.
    Reread my first sentence as Buffalo took the BPA, I was not being critical, merely making an observation why a bottom team gets as much talent as possible.
    This trade which includes Brännström would return the BPA for Olofsson.
    But to your question Beniers was a very good option.
    Buffalo needed Centers at the time of draft as Krebs was a Kraken and Thompson was a RW.
    13 mars 2022 à 13 h 23
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 9,508
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
    Quoting: gretzkyghosts
    Please read my entire post.
    You picked out one part of a sentence (Buffalo is in this predicament) without understanding the entire context.
    Reread my first sentence as Buffalo took the BPA, I was not being critical, merely making an observation why a bottom team gets as much talent as possible.
    This trade which includes Brännström would return the BPA for Olofsson.
    But to your question Beniers was a very good option.
    Buffalo needed Centers at the time of draft as Krebs was a Kraken and Thompson was a RW.


    My question was why does one need to question why buffalo is in this predicament, I did read your whole post. Just dudn understand fully
    13 mars 2022 à 14 h 22
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 5,352
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
    Quoting: BuFfaLOFaN
    My question was why does one need to question why buffalo is in this predicament, I did read your whole post. Just dudn understand fully
    Please tell me what does "this predicament" have to do with my comment about Buffalo accepting the trade?
    But to answer your second post the "predicament" right now is having 4 NHL LHD (see above) in the pipe line and only 2 RHD (Jokiharju and Laaksonen).

    Circling back to my original comment, I would make the trade as Buffalo would be getting a pick and a good prospect for Olofsson.
    If needed those chips or others, could be used to obtain a RHD.

    Let me close this is a very disappointing discussion TBH.
    I have given many of your posts likes even if I do not agree with every word because the essence of your post was valid.
    If you disagree with my premise that the trade is fair and Buffalo should do it fine, and I can accept and move on.
    But to carry on over one part (one word) of sentence!
    That, I do not understand.
    13 mars 2022 à 15 h 12
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 9,508
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
    Quoting: gretzkyghosts
    Please tell me what does "this predicament" have to do with my comment about Buffalo accepting the trade?
    But to answer your second post the "predicament" right now is having 4 NHL LHD (see above) in the pipe line and only 2 RHD (Jokiharju and Laaksonen).

    Circling back to my original comment, I would make the trade as Buffalo would be getting a pick and a good prospect for Olofsson.
    If needed those chips or others, could be used to obtain a RHD.

    Let me close this is a very disappointing discussion TBH.
    I have given many of your posts likes even if I do not agree with every word because the essence of your post was valid.
    If you disagree with my premise that the trade is fair and Buffalo should do it fine, and I can accept and move on.
    But to carry on over one part (one word) of sentence!
    That, I do not understand.


    I'm sorry, I didn't mean to carry over just one part, and in general I completely agreed with your post. most of your posts, and appreciate all the likes.

    I was just asking if there was another player available that was better than Power. I haven't followed the rookies very much this year, obviously I've followed power but that's about all. I wanted Beniers before the draft, but there isn't anything I can do about that now.
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    13 mars 2022 à 16 h 5
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 5,352
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
    Quoting: BuFfaLOFaN
    I'm sorry, I didn't mean to carry over just one part, and in general I completely agreed with your post. most of your posts, and appreciate all the likes.

    I was just asking if there was another player available that was better than Power. I haven't followed the rookies very much this year, obviously I've followed power but that's about all. I wanted Beniers before the draft, but there isn't anything I can do about that now.
    Then we agree completely.
    I thought Buffalo would trade the pick or take Berniers.
    So many of the players drafted in the first round (or later) last year all play for the University of Michigan.
    Owen Power first,
    Matty Beniers second,
    Luke Hughes fourth,
    Kent Johnson fifth,
    Matthew "Mackie" Samoskevich 24th
    Dylan Duke 126th

    Brendan Brisson 29th 2020 draft
    Thomas Bordeleau 38th 2020 draft
    Jacob Truscott 144th 2020 draft

    To muddy the picture, U of M GK is Erik Portillo, drafted by Buffalo 67th in 2019.
    Is he any good a just a GK on a good team

    So are these guys really good.
    Or are they hanging on each other's coattails as Dylan Strome (McDavid's team mate in Erie) did when he was taken 3rd OA behind McDavid and Eichel.
    BuFfaLOFaN a aimé ceci.
    13 mars 2022 à 18 h 5
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 9,508
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
    Quoting: gretzkyghosts
    Then we agree completely.
    I thought Buffalo would trade the pick or take Berniers.
    So many of the players drafted in the first round (or later) last year all play for the University of Michigan.
    Owen Power first,
    Matty Beniers second,
    Luke Hughes fourth,
    Kent Johnson fifth,
    Matthew "Mackie" Samoskevich 24th
    Dylan Duke 126th

    Brendan Brisson 29th 2020 draft
    Thomas Bordeleau 38th 2020 draft
    Jacob Truscott 144th 2020 draft

    To muddy the picture, U of M GK is Erik Portillo, drafted by Buffalo 67th in 2019.
    Is he any good a just a GK on a good team

    So are these guys really good.
    Or are they hanging on each other's coattails as Dylan Strome (McDavid's team mate in Erie) did when he was taken 3rd OA behind McDavid and Eichel.


    Yea, wasnt Debrincat was also part of that coattails if I remember correctly? He turned out alright. Yea the sabres goaltending prospect pool is also a little overloaded, just like LD with Portillo, UPL, and Levi all going to be trying for spots...
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
    13 mars 2022 à 19 h 19
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 5,352
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
    Modifié 13 mars 2022 à 20 h 54
    Quoting: BuFfaLOFaN
    Yea, wasnt Debrincat was also part of that coattails if I remember correctly? He turned out alright. Yea the sabres goaltending prospect pool is also a little overloaded, just like LD with Portillo, UPL, and Levi all going to be trying for spots...
    Yes DeBrincat played with Strome and McDavid in the 2014-15 season.
    He led the Otters with 51 goals that year.
    Of the three, Strome is the only disappointment.

    Let me add, the 2016 draft was one of Tim Murray's magic moments.
    He took Nylander over Sergachev, then traded the 38th and 89th pick to move up in the draft to take Aspland 33rd OA.
    DeBrincat was taken with the 39th pick. Perfect example of Murray's ability to judge talent.
    Imagine if Buffalo had Sergachev and DeBrincat!
    BuFfaLOFaN a aimé ceci.
    13 mars 2022 à 21 h 49
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 9,508
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
    Quoting: gretzkyghosts
    Yes DeBrincat played with Strome and McDavid in the 2014-15 season.
    He led the Otters with 51 goals that year.
    Of the three, Strome is the only disappointment.

    Let me add, the 2016 draft was one of Tim Murray's magic moments.
    He took Nylander over Sergachev, then traded the 38th and 89th pick to move up in the draft to take Aspland 33rd OA.
    DeBrincat was taken with the 39th pick. Perfect example of Murray's ability to judge talent.
    Imagine if Buffalo had Sergachev and DeBrincat!


    Would have been a completely different franchise, probably still have Eichel, Renhart, Ullmark, and sadly risto would still be in our top 5, probably no Dahlin
    gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage