rangers pass

NSH declines. Don't see Drouin as a good fit there.

Lohrei is 100% a non-starter for the Bruins.

So you think most of the trades are habs one -sided ?

So you like the trade idea or you think Chariot is not a match for Boston ?

Is there an offensive player of the Habs , that might do it instead of Drouin at the TDL?

Close or miles apart ?

the retention works for the avs if they need it

To be frank, I saw that the habs were "helping" a team retain cap and were only getting a 5th/6th rounder in return and just stopped there. It doesn't make any sense to me

No, not really.

If you look at last year's TDL the shark's made such a retention in a 3-way trade. They didn't gain that much more.

No from Boston. The injury to Zboril is irrelevant. It was months ago. They have 4 mediocre LD already, adding another one does nothing.

They need and LD1 like Lindholm or none at all. And they need an physical RD3.

And Lohrei for a mediocre rental is just never going to be an option.

Well Detroit got a 4th in the Savard deal
San Jose a 4th in the Foligno deal
The value is good in my mind with the 2 picks

Lohrei is our top defensive prospect. Easily no

NYR decline... Berard does not equate to Lehkonen...

lehkonen + 3 ? WDYT

I'll be honest I'm just not a fan of Chariot.

1. 4th + 5th for Giroux retention maybe. 4th is in the range of $1.25M retention. 5th should be enough for the rest (or a low end prospect).

3. Kravtsov for a 2nd, sure.
Garand for Kulak doesn't make sense. No need for a middling goalie prospect.
Berard is not near enough for Lehkonen.

4. Chiarot to Boston for a LHD doesn't make sense. Not a want or a need. Even without considering rivalry and fit.

5. Idea and return is "okay", but nothing to jump at. Allen needs to be back in action first regardless.

6. I personally think it's worth a 2nd to Arizona for Weber's contract. If it were my money and I had that many 2nd rounders, I'd do it.
I think the cost is actually lower however. Weber's contract isn't a factor right now, but the opportunity to move it before it gets in the way might be more important than getting return value.
You have to consider his $8M eating up the majority of the 10% off season cushion.

7. Pretty meh return for Petry. Last resort is to move him for a shorter term contract. I'd keep him before moving him for that little, but this is at least something to consider if he absolutely has to be moved.

8. No way. Not doing Toronto any favors and the last thing we need is another expensive goalie with term.

9. Not bad, but retention might be required. I'd settle for Allard and a conditional 3rd (Drouin games played).

10. Can't see Gourde being a consideration unless it's for Dvorak. Seattle will also want a piece with more high end potential, none of the 2nd, Poehling, or Armia qualify.

Thank you for your complete feedback

To me trading a player with so much hype as Berard for anything unless it is outrageous is a bad move for NY.

>Trades for Smith.

See this guy understands the Oilers woes.