SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kapanen Trade

Créé par: gpmack95
Équipe: 2021-22 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 23 févr. 2022
Publié: 23 févr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Björkqvist, Kasper
  2. Kapanen, Kasperi
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
PIT
  1. Deslauriers, Nicolas
  2. Rakell, Rickard
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (NSH)
2.
ANA
  1. Denisenko, Grigori
  2. Juolevi, Olli
  3. Nutivaara, Markus
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de FLA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de FLA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $52 921 166 $0 $3 282 500 $28 578 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
809 166 $809 166 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
2 700 000 $2 700 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 févr. 2022 à 7 h 22
#1
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
I mean, I don't hate it, but I also don't particularly like it (The Kapanen trade). Think I'd prefer pick(s) or prospect(s) for Rakell, and then to try to upgrade the lineup this summer. I don't dislike Kappy, but unless you're moving Silf somewhere, it's basically like 3 full lines of 3rd/4th liners. Also, might as well keep D-Lo to continue punching guys in the face.

Florida trade-I'm in. That's a lot of pieces though.
TZ11 a aimé ceci.
23 févr. 2022 à 7 h 24
#2
In Zito We Trust
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 2,790
Mentions "j'aime": 1,596
Rather trade Tippett than Denisenko
gpmack95 a aimé ceci.
23 févr. 2022 à 7 h 49
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,570
Mentions "j'aime": 11,951
I agree with @Lenny7 — I’d rather have picks for Rakell than Kapanen and keep Des as well
Lenny7, TZ11 et gpmack95 a aimé ceci.
23 févr. 2022 à 8 h 10
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
The Rakell deal is terrible IMO. Rakell may only be a complimentary winger and has a tendency to float around, but he's still a very capable scorer (in the right situation). Stick him on a line with a top C on a more successful team and he'll flourish. He certainly isn't a play driver, but he is capable of turning it on at times. Kapanen is a huge downgrade from that and the rest of the deal is just filler. Easy pass.

The Lindholm deal is respectable, but I'd pass. Would prefer a player closer to the league and someone less risk attached. Lindholm is a legit top pairing D-man. Some people are criminally underrating him because the team is bad. He's a legit shutdown option who plays big minutes and has years left in the tank. I presume any move would be discussed with Lindholm to ensure he's happy to stay at said team, so the excuse that he's a UFA and therefore worth less is weak. He's a trade and sign deal. IMO, ANA should do all they can to keep him.
23 févr. 2022 à 8 h 21
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 1,138
Mentions "j'aime": 446
Quoting: mytduxfan
The Rakell deal is terrible IMO. Rakell may only be a complimentary winger and has a tendency to float around, but he's still a very capable scorer (in the right situation). Stick him on a line with a top C on a more successful team and he'll flourish. He certainly isn't a play driver, but he is capable of turning it on at times. Kapanen is a huge downgrade from that and the rest of the deal is just filler. Easy pass.

The Lindholm deal is respectable, but I'd pass. Would prefer a player closer to the league and someone less risk attached. Lindholm is a legit top pairing D-man. Some people are criminally underrating him because the team is bad. He's a legit shutdown option who plays big minutes and has years left in the tank. I presume any move would be discussed with Lindholm to ensure he's happy to stay at said team, so the excuse that he's a UFA and therefore worth less is weak. He's a trade and sign deal. IMO, ANA should do all they can to keep him.


Would the trade be better if you got Tippett instead of Denisenko?
1 mars 2022 à 7 h 23
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: RaZZe
Would the trade be better if you got Tippett instead of Denisenko?


Unfortunately not as he's a little older than I'd like and hasn't really secured his position in the NHL. Give me Tippett's size and numbers on a 21 year old and I'd bite. Sadly, outside of Lundell, I don't think FLA has a prospect I'd take for Lindholm. IMO, Anaheim needs less quantity and more quality pieces coming back, even if that means downgrading 1sts to 2nds and/or taking back salary. That said, if Lindholm was to force his way out, I'd take the deal you've presented.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage