SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fly Baby Fly

Créé par: eVANder
Équipe: 2021-22 Flyers de Philadelphie
Date de création initiale: 27 janv. 2022
Publié: 28 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Time for a "retool" in philly
Transactions
1.
PHI
  1. Helleson, Drew [Liste de réserve]
  2. Kaut, Martin
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (COL)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (COL)
COL
  1. Giroux, Claude (4 137 500 $ retained)
2.
PHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
3.
PHI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
4.
PHI
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. Mrázek, Petr
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Jones, Martin (1 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Ristolainen, Rasmus (1 400 000 $ retained)
5.
PHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de PHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de PHI
Logo de COL
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de PHI
Logo de BOS
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
2023
Logo de PHI
Logo de COL
Logo de PHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
2024
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
Logo de PHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $72 522 928 $0 $1 450 000 $8 977 072 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 333 333 $4 333 333 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 571 429 $3 571 429 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
863 333 $863 333 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 979 000 $3 979 000 $
G
RFA - 3
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
4 675 000 $4 675 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
825 000 $825 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
750 000 $750 000 $
DG, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
880 833 $880 833 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
780 833 $780 833 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 janv. 2022 à 0 h 36
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,868
Mentions "j'aime": 8,869
Boston would be more interested Braun than Yandle.
28 janv. 2022 à 0 h 40
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Holl and Mrazek are far better than Risto and Jones.
palhal a aimé ceci.
28 janv. 2022 à 0 h 42
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2015
Messages: 1,086
Mentions "j'aime": 324
Avs would have to move more money out, probably JT Compher. I think that value is ok if you add him to the package you proposed, but 5 pieces for a rental feels like Colorado is giving up a lot of organizational depth.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
28 janv. 2022 à 0 h 45
#4
Démarrer sujet
Canuck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 75
Quoting: Mergus80
Avs would have to move more money out, probably JT Compher. I think that value is ok if you add him to the package you proposed, but 5 pieces for a rental feels like Colorado is giving up a lot of organizational depth.


True but this is their year to go all in. They're going to make a play for the biggest fish.
28 janv. 2022 à 0 h 55
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2015
Messages: 1,086
Mentions "j'aime": 324
Quoting: eVANder
True but this is their year to go all in. They're going to make a play for the biggest fish.


I don’t disagree. I’m thinking about quality vs quantity here. Giroux replaces Compher in the lineup at least for this year, so that’s fine. But then Colorado gives up 4 mid-tier future assets. I don’t question with the value of the package as much as the sheer quantity of assets. At what point would Colorado be better off trading a 1st instead of a 2nd and a 3rd (Shuckers’ draft pick value chart says 2nd+3rd > 1st assuming Colorado is picking in the late 20s) or a better prospect like Barron instead of two prospects a step below.
28 janv. 2022 à 1 h 2
#6
Démarrer sujet
Canuck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 75
Quoting: Mergus80
I don’t disagree. I’m thinking about quality vs quantity here. Giroux replaces Compher in the lineup at least for this year, so that’s fine. But then Colorado gives up 4 mid-tier future assets. I don’t question with the value of the package as much as the sheer quantity of assets. At what point would Colorado be better off trading a 1st instead of a 2nd and a 3rd (Shuckers’ draft pick value chart says 2nd+3rd > 1st assuming Colorado is picking in the late 20s) or a better prospect like Barron instead of two prospects a step below.


I was debating whether to go a 1st or 2nd and a 3rd. For some reason the first seemed too rich to me given the prospects included for a rental. Interesting note though on the draft pick value chart, I can see that given the 1st would be late in the round.
SankFeravalli a aimé ceci.
28 janv. 2022 à 1 h 6
#7
Démarrer sujet
Canuck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 75
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Holl and Mrazek are far better than Risto and Jones.


Can't disagree with you fully on that. Jones stinks and Risto is one of those guys that should be way better than he is but just constantly lets you down.. I was more so playing on the fact that they're UFAs and Dubas needs to move some pieces out to resign Soupy. It likely waits till the offseason but Mrazek needs to be moved.
28 janv. 2022 à 4 h 46
#8
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,984
Mentions "j'aime": 22,938
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Holl and Mrazek are far better than Risto and Jones.


You're being polite.....And to think the Leafs and a first and third.

Funny, Leafs have the best GAA in the Atlantic division, but some many think Leafs have so many lousy Dman and need to get dregs from non playoff teams.
28 janv. 2022 à 10 h 5
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
Bruins are not taking yandle. Let’s just get rid of that notion as its in every flyers ACGM.
eVANder a aimé ceci.
28 janv. 2022 à 13 h 11
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2015
Messages: 1,086
Mentions "j'aime": 324
Quoting: eVANder
I was debating whether to go a 1st or 2nd and a 3rd. For some reason the first seemed too rich to me given the prospects included for a rental. Interesting note though on the draft pick value chart, I can see that given the 1st would be late in the round.


I’ll be interested to see how it shakes out. Sakic has been pretty conservative at the deadline recently so this might be the time he decides to push all his chips in, like you said. Avs aren’t the only team with few/no blue chip prospects either. Some of teams rumored to be involved with Chychrun (Boston, NYR) may have to go the quantity-over-quality route to get a trade like that done. Should be an interesting next couple of months.
eVANder a aimé ceci.
28 janv. 2022 à 14 h 49
#11
Démarrer sujet
Canuck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 374
Mentions "j'aime": 75
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
Bruins are not taking yandle. Let’s just get rid of that notion as its in every flyers ACGM.


Big locker room guy. Lol
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage