SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Interesting trades

Créé par: GMs
Équipe: 2022-23 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 30 déc. 2021
Publié: 30 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
For the 3LHD spot, Jordan Harris (if he signs, in this scenario he does), Kayden Guhle, Mattias Norlinder & Sami Niku fight for the 3LHD spot. The two between Guhle Harris & Norlinder who doesn’t make the team will be assigned too the Laval Rocket

MTL draft Simon Nemec with their 1st RD pick on 2022 (probably between 3 & 6)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 500 000 $
21 550 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 400 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Nemec, Simon
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Lavoie, Raphael
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Option 1 : 2022 1st RD pick

Option 2 : Raphaël Lavoie + 2022 2nd RD pick
EDM
    Ben Chiarot 2022 TDL Half Retained
    2.
    MTL
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
    Détails additionnels:
    Late 1st RD pick & late 2nd RD pick
    Tyler Pitlick for cap purposes
    2022 TDL
    CGY
    1. Toffoli, Tyler
    Détails additionnels:
    CGY acquired a sniper who shoots right, will complete the top 6
    2022 TDL
    3.
    MTL
    1. Caulfield, Judd [Liste de réserve]
    2. Zucker, Jason
    Détails additionnels:
    MTL need to tank so it make sense acquiring Zucker
    Long shot on Judd Caulfield
    MTL sees value in this trade with creating cap space after the 2022-2023 season
    PIT
    1. Hoffman, Mike
    Détails additionnels:
    PIT needs a goal scorer
    4.
    MTL
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (MTL)
    Détails additionnels:
    Everyone knows why
    ARI
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (CAR)
    Détails additionnels:
    Everyone knows why
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de FLA
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de CAR
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de STL
    2023
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    2024
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    Logo de MTL
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2382 500 000 $76 140 416 $1 132 500 $850 000 $6 359 584 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
    C
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 3
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    875 000 $875 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    2 343 750 $2 343 750 $
    DD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    925 000 $925 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG, AD, C
    UFA
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Nemec, Simon
    925 000 $925 000 $
    Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    30 déc. 2021 à 18 h 24
    #1
    Pens are the best
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2021
    Messages: 5,390
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,691
    I guess the pens accept
    GMs a aimé ceci.
    30 déc. 2021 à 18 h 30
    #2
    PittsburghModelMyAss
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,423
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,437
    In a year where there is no real consensus top pairing D available, we use a top-5 pick on Nemec? Dear lord please no
    30 déc. 2021 à 18 h 32
    #3
    retired
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 8,893
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
    not bad for a habs roster. trades are pretty fair.

    i think harris walks tho
    30 déc. 2021 à 18 h 52
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 14,042
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
    Quoting: BigBadBurke
    In a year where there is no real consensus top pairing D available, we use a top-5 pick on Nemec? Dear lord please no


    Like Seider ? Nemec & Jiricek are both going out in the top 10
    30 déc. 2021 à 19 h 3
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 2,705
    Mentions "j'aime": 994
    Quoting: Imagine875948
    I guess the pens accept


    I'd rather keep Zucker. Hoffman is a great threat on the PP, but his production at 5v5 is no better than Zucker, while being a black hole defensively.
    Mr_Gardoki a aimé ceci.
    30 déc. 2021 à 19 h 4
    #6
    PittsburghModelMyAss
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,423
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,437
    Quoting: GMs
    Like Seider ? Nemec & Jiricek are both going out in the top 10


    Seider was a consensus top-pairing dman... Nemec & Jiricek are widely looked at as middle pairing guys. You don't waste a top-5 pick on that
    30 déc. 2021 à 19 h 33
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2020
    Messages: 2,680
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,448
    Quoting: BigBadBurke
    Seider was a consensus top-pairing dman... Nemec & Jiricek are widely looked at as middle pairing guys. You don't waste a top-5 pick on that


    seider was ranked 16 by bob Mckenzie who interviews 10 scouts and averages it out. Everybody was shocked when seider was taken sixth.Central scouting had him as the number 4 European D. I can't find one person who had him top 10, highest being 15. Nemec and Jiricek are both considered to be easy top 4 dmen who have a legitimate shot at being top pair

    Not saying that's who'd id take, as it depends on where we pick and whose gone. But to lose your mind about picking them isn't that smart
    TraderJoes et GMs a aimé ceci.
    30 déc. 2021 à 19 h 44
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 476
    Mentions "j'aime": 185
    Quoting: BigBadBurke
    Seider was a consensus top-pairing dman... Nemec & Jiricek are widely looked at as middle pairing guys. You don't waste a top-5 pick on that

    No they aren't. They're both pegged as having #1 D upside.
    30 déc. 2021 à 19 h 49
    #9
    PittsburghModelMyAss
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,423
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,437
    Quoting: Howisjulienstillhere
    seider was ranked 16 by bob Mckenzie who interviews 10 scouts and averages it out. Everybody was shocked when seider was taken sixth.Central scouting had him as the number 4 European D. I can't find one person who had him top 10, highest being 15. Nemec and Jiricek are both considered to be easy top 4 dmen who have a legitimate shot at being top pair

    Not saying that's who'd id take, as it depends on where we pick and whose gone. But to lose your mind about picking them isn't that smart


    Name me one defensemen who wasn't thought of to be a sure thing top pairing D go in the top-5, i'll wait... THAT wouldn't be too smart
    30 déc. 2021 à 20 h 1
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2020
    Messages: 2,680
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,448
    Quoting: BigBadBurke
    Name me one defensemen who wasn't thought of to be a sure thing top pairing D go in the top-5, i'll wait... THAT wouldn't be too smart


    I mentioned not a firm top pair as outside of truly special defence man, namely those who go first overall I don't personally consider someone a firm top pair unless the draft is truly special with d-men

    Both of these two are firmly very good defensemen who should certainly be considered in the top 5. If other people mention top pair that's on them, I won't go that far just as I wouldn't when Hanifin went 5

    could you provide your rankings at least up until those two
    BigBadBurke a aimé ceci.
    30 déc. 2021 à 20 h 11
    #11
    PittsburghModelMyAss
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,423
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,437
    Modifié 30 déc. 2021 à 20 h 17
    Quoting: Howisjulienstillhere
    I mentioned not a firm top pair as outside of truly special defence man, namely those who go first overall I don't personally consider someone a firm top pair unless the draft is truly special with d-men

    Both of these two are firmly very good defensemen who should certainly be considered in the top 5. If other people mention top pair that's on them, I won't go that far just as I wouldn't when Hanifin went 5

    could you provide your rankings at least up until those two


    There's a difference between very good defensemen and ELITE top-pairing game changing defensemen. One you take with a top-5 pick, the other you don't. Alls I'm saying is, you don't go after a defensemen at 1-5 if you're not 100% sure they will be a top-2 on your team for the next decade +

    My rankings are I would have the Forward group with bigger star potential from 1-7 and Nemec & Jiricek just inside/outside the top-8

    1. Wright
    2. Kemell
    3. Savoie
    4. Lambert
    5. Yurov
    6. Cooley
    7. Slafkovsky
    8. Miroshnichenko/Nemec/Jiricek
    30 déc. 2021 à 20 h 16
    #12
    JimmyPaek
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 4,076
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,203
    Hoffman is a meh trade for us. We need someone who can play on a wing when Geno comes back. I’d rather have Drouin or Toffoli on a line with him than Hoffman
    GMs a aimé ceci.
    30 déc. 2021 à 20 h 24
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2020
    Messages: 2,680
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,448
    Quoting: BigBadBurke
    There's a difference between very good defensemen and ELITE top-pairing game changing defensemen. One you take with a top-5 pick, the other you don't. Alls I'm saying is, you don't go after a defensemen at 1-5 if you're not 100% sure they will be a top-2 on your team for the next decade +

    My rankings are I would have the Forward group with bigger star potential from 1-7 and Nemec & Jiricek just inside/outside the top-8

    1. Wright
    2. Kemell
    3. Savoie
    4. Lambert
    5. Yurov
    6. Cooley
    7. Slafkovsky
    8. Miroshnichenko/Nemec/Jiricek


    I understand your point now, I know its early but Yurov cooley and Slafkovsky project as middle six players. just wondering why your comfortable with a most likely middle six winger over a sure thing top 4 dman. Like Nemec and jiricek are in the Jeff perty (outside of this year ) category with some more upside while you listed three players who are in the Toffoli territory (outside of last year)

    I can certainly understand if you had him at 5. Again the confusing thing is your okay with meh forwards but will only take elite defensemen?
    GMs a aimé ceci.
    30 déc. 2021 à 20 h 40
    #14
    PittsburghModelMyAss
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,423
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,437
    Quoting: Howisjulienstillhere
    I understand your point now, I know its early but Yurov cooley and Slafkovsky project as middle six players. just wondering why your comfortable with a most likely middle six winger over a sure thing top 4 dman. Like Nemec and jiricek are in the Jeff perty (outside of this year ) category with some more upside while you listed three players who are in the Toffoli territory (outside of last year)

    I can certainly understand if you had him at 5. Again the confusing thing is your okay with meh forwards but will only take elite defensemen?


    Because defensemen notably take much longer to make an impact at the nhl level than forwards do. And it is much easier to find steady very good defensemen outside of the top-10 than it is high skilled forwards.
    30 déc. 2021 à 20 h 51
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2020
    Messages: 2,680
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,448
    Modifié 30 déc. 2021 à 21 h 0
    Quoting: BigBadBurke
    Because defensemen notably take much longer to make an impact at the nhl level than forwards do. And it is much easier to find steady very good defensemen outside of the top-10 than it is high skilled forwards.


    Id rather wait 7 years for massive impact than 5 for mediocre impact. Is your goal with this potential top 5 pick to turn the habs around as to me outside of your top 4 those players are very long shots to be the type of player to turn a team around. watching Montreal for years I absolutely am driven mental but mediocre players

    To me based on your list if you have pick 5 you either pick Miroshnichenko as he has massive upside or you grab one of the two d

    Very good but not elite defensemen have so much more value than mediocre/solid forwards. Not sure why you'd take the considerably less valuable player simply because they impact the team early

    Also defensemen outside of Nemec and Jiricek are absolute crap shoots while you can get some legitimate forwards with massive skill like lekkerimaki in the first round and there's always tons of talented forwards in the other rounds

    Draft the defensemen over cooley Yurok geekie and Slafkovsky and wait the extra couple of years as its worth it. Also really good defencemen develop pretty quickly
    GMs a aimé ceci.
    30 déc. 2021 à 21 h 17
    #16
    PittsburghModelMyAss
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,423
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,437
    Quoting: Howisjulienstillhere
    Id rather wait 7 years for massive impact than 5 for mediocre impact. Is your goal with this potential top 5 pick to turn the habs around as to me outside of your top 4 those players are very long shots to be the type of player to turn a team around. watching Montreal for years I absolutely am driven mental but mediocre players

    To me based on your list if you have pick 5 you either pick Miroshnichenko as he has massive upside or you grab one of the two d

    Very good but not elite defensemen have so much more value than mediocre/solid forwards. Not sure why you'd take the considerably less valuable player simply because they impact the team early

    Also defensemen outside of Nemec and Jiricek are absolute crap shoots while you can get some legitimate forwards with massive skill like lekkerimaki in the first round and there's always tons of talented forwards in the other rounds

    Draft the defensemen over cooley Yurok geekie and Slafkovsky and wait the extra couple of years as its worth it. Also really good defencemen develop pretty quickly


    Well i Kindly disagree... and if you're looking to make an impact in 7yrs time, I wld personally trade down then and take Salomonsson instead of the two you are so high on
    30 déc. 2021 à 21 h 32
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2020
    Messages: 2,680
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,448
    Quoting: BigBadBurke
    Well i Kindly disagree... and if you're looking to make an impact in 7yrs time, I wld personally trade down then and take Salomonsson instead of the two you are so high on


    why would you take a much weaker player just to gain a second. Our conversation seems to come down to you being fine with mediocrity and me not liking mediocrity. I mentioned 7 years as Cooley Yurok Slafkovsky are probably 5 years away from a prime impact so I added two years because they are defence man.

    My opinion is and will continue to be get massive impact players and build off them for a championship team and add mediocre players to finish off the roster not to build around

    Good day sir
    30 déc. 2021 à 22 h 43
    #18
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 14,042
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
    Quoting: Howisjulienstillhere
    why would you take a much weaker player just to gain a second. Our conversation seems to come down to you being fine with mediocrity and me not liking mediocrity. I mentioned 7 years as Cooley Yurok Slafkovsky are probably 5 years away from a prime impact so I added two years because they are defence man.

    My opinion is and will continue to be get massive impact players and build off them for a championship team and add mediocre players to finish off the roster not to build around

    Good day sir


    Man I couldn’t agree more with everything you said. Sure we take Wright Kemell Savoie over Nemec or Jiricek, but after those 3, I am torn with taking the big RHD. I know this would be for position instead of BPA but if they are equals, I would go with a RHD. And yes, no one had Seider in their top 10, freaking nobody.
    Howisjulienstillhere a aimé ceci.
    30 déc. 2021 à 22 h 59
    #19
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2020
    Messages: 2,680
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,448
    Quoting: GMs
    Man I couldn’t agree more with everything you said. Sure we take Wright Kemell Savoie over Nemec or Jiricek, but after those 3, I am torn with taking the big RHD. I know this would be for position instead of BPA but if they are equals, I would go with a RHD. And yes, no one had Seider in their top 10, freaking nobody.


    id add Lambert to that list above Nemec and jiricek. he can skate so well, pass really well. Im still a fan of Miroshnichenko but that's a tough one. To me Nemec and Jiricek become the best player available (which a term I hate) ahead of cooley Slafkovsky and Yurov
    GMs a aimé ceci.
    31 déc. 2021 à 1 h 27
    #20
    Hakuna Matata
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2020
    Messages: 34,830
    Mentions "j'aime": 21,214
    I feel Lehkonen is also gonna be moved

    Apparently last offseason they tried to move him for Blais but he refused to sign in St. Louis which was why Mtl gave him that 1 year deal as apparently they plan to try again.

    Could get a nice return for him though as he would be a welcomed addition to competitive teams bottom 6
    31 déc. 2021 à 1 h 42
    #21
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 14,042
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
    Quoting: aadoyle
    I feel Lehkonen is also gonna be moved

    Apparently last offseason they tried to move him for Blais but he refused to sign in St. Louis which was why Mtl gave him that 1 year deal as apparently they plan to try again.

    Could get a nice return for him though as he would be a welcomed addition to competitive teams bottom 6


    If we are rebuilding, he should stay because his work ethic is perfect. He is appreciated from all is teammates, everything will depends on is new deal IMO. If he wants 3M+ I think they will move him for sure
    31 déc. 2021 à 1 h 43
    #22
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 14,042
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
    Quoting: Howisjulienstillhere
    id add Lambert to that list above Nemec and jiricek. he can skate so well, pass really well. Im still a fan of Miroshnichenko but that's a tough one. To me Nemec and Jiricek become the best player available (which a term I hate) ahead of cooley Slafkovsky and Yurov


    I can’t talk abut Miroshnichenko because I never saw him played, but yeah Lambert should be ahead of Nemec & Jiricek
    31 déc. 2021 à 1 h 56
    #23
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2020
    Messages: 2,680
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,448
    Quoting: GMs
    I can’t talk abut Miroshnichenko because I never saw him played, but yeah Lambert should be ahead of Nemec & Jiricek


    lets just say if everything goes right you've got a special winger

    Dude can skate, hit and has an absolutely lethal shot both wrister and one timer from the ovi office

    unfortunately he's been inconsistent in the points department in the vhl this year

    its a tough call for me to take him ahead of Nemec and Jiricek but I just really like this kid and if you can get a 40 goal scorer who can riffle it on the pp and hit , my goodness you've got a beast
    GMs a aimé ceci.
    31 déc. 2021 à 12 h 52
    #24
    PittsburghModelMyAss
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,423
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,437
    Quoting: GMs
    Man I couldn’t agree more with everything you said. Sure we take Wright Kemell Savoie over Nemec or Jiricek, but after those 3, I am torn with taking the big RHD. I know this would be for position instead of BPA but if they are equals, I would go with a RHD. And yes, no one had Seider in their top 10, freaking nobody.


    Quoting: Howisjulienstillhere
    id add Lambert to that list above Nemec and jiricek. he can skate so well, pass really well. Im still a fan of Miroshnichenko but that's a tough one. To me Nemec and Jiricek become the best player available (which a term I hate) ahead of cooley Slafkovsky and Yurov


    Quoting: Howisjulienstillhere
    lets just say if everything goes right you've got a special winger

    Dude can skate, hit and has an absolutely lethal shot both wrister and one timer from the ovi office

    unfortunately he's been inconsistent in the points department in the vhl this year

    its a tough call for me to take him ahead of Nemec and Jiricek but I just really like this kid and if you can get a 40 goal scorer who can riffle it on the pp and hit , my goodness you've got a beast


    Ok so it sounds like you two would also now take Wright, Kemell, Savoie, Lambert, Miroshnichenko over Nemec/Jiricek?

    lol so precisely what I was saying then as I stated earlier, you don't pick either of those guys with a top-5 pick... Fine take them over Cooley/Yurov/Slafkovsky but not the others who are game breakers and will be high impact offensive catalysts for whichever team drafts them
    31 déc. 2021 à 14 h 21
    #25
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2020
    Messages: 2,680
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,448
    Modifié 31 déc. 2021 à 15 h 16
    Quoting: BigBadBurke
    Ok so it sounds like you two would also now take Wright, Kemell, Savoie, Lambert, Miroshnichenko over Nemec/Jiricek?

    lol so precisely what I was saying then as I stated earlier, you don't pick either of those guys with a top-5 pick... Fine take them over Cooley/Yurov/Slafkovsky but not the others who are game breakers and will be high impact offensive catalysts for whichever team drafts them


    If we wanna get technical I didn’t say firmly to take Miroshnichenko. I said maybe but it’s tough for me. If you take Wright,savoie,Lambert,kemell that makes the the d you take a top 5 pick

    Not sure why you’d be upset with him going 5 but not 6. The strength of the draft would determine that one spot

    To me if you have the balls you take Miroshnichenko 5 but it also depends on your team. Currently I’m not having him as a firm pick over the two d
    BigBadBurke a aimé ceci.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage