SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next year

Créé par: MauriceArthur15
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 13 déc. 2021
Publié: 13 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
32 500 000 $
2800 000 $
32 000 000 $
21 700 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
21 000 000 $
2900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 500 000 $
1750 000 $
21 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Lind, Kole [Droits de RFA]
2.
TOR
  1. Crouse, Lawson [Droits de RFA]
ARI
  1. Ritchie, Nick
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
4.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
Lower of their 2 2nd rounders
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de FLA
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CGY
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $82 289 783 $212 500 $0 $210 217 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 déc. 2021 à 13 h 47
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,526
Mentions "j'aime": 22,680
Hard to believe that Arizona would trade the cheaper and better with more controllable years Crouse for cap dump Ritchie and a thirdshakes head
13 déc. 2021 à 13 h 48
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 1,549
Mentions "j'aime": 838
Oilers say no thanks. Our goaltending is a bit up in the air but Mrazek isn't a solution. Other teams aren't going to give the Leafs that kind of value to help them with their cap situation.
CD282 et Bringer_Of_Snow a aimé ceci.
13 déc. 2021 à 13 h 52
#3
Démarrer sujet
TopDawgReese
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,241
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: palhal
Hard to believe that Arizona would trade the cheaper and better with more controllable years Crouse for cap dump Ritchie and a thirdshakes head


They need to hit the cap floor😉
13 déc. 2021 à 13 h 54
#4
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,073
Mentions "j'aime": 3,511
SEA probably says no.
ARZ may bite on that, ARZ fans can elaborate on it.
Depending on how Skinner progresses, if he still needs some time maybe EDM jumps on this. Not sure of the value.
CGY likely says no. They've got some big names that need new contracts and will need all the cap space they can get.
13 déc. 2021 à 13 h 54
#5
Démarrer sujet
TopDawgReese
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,241
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: rpain
Oilers say no thanks. Our goaltending is a bit up in the air but Mrazek isn't a solution. Other teams aren't going to give the Leafs that kind of value to help them with their cap situation.


Just as much Toronto is in a cap crunch so is Edmonton. They need affordable and good goalies. Unfortunately it’s a lot harder finding a good goalie at a great cap hit for a lower cost.
13 déc. 2021 à 13 h 58
#6
Démarrer sujet
TopDawgReese
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,241
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: Ritzy
SEA probably says no.
ARZ may bite on that, ARZ fans can elaborate on it.
Depending on how Skinner progresses, if he still needs some time maybe EDM jumps on this. Not sure of the value.
CGY likely says no. They've got some big names that need new contracts and will need all the cap space they can get.


Seattle loved Holl and if him and McCann were available in the expansion draft Holl would’ve been the selection. They’re trading a fringe player for a bottom pairing dman at a good cap hit.

Skinner isn’t anything special tbh and they can’t bank on him developing. They need goalie help and badly. Makes zero sense to keep waiting for players to develop while spending money and needs consistently contend in the McDavid era.

Calgary was more of if they don’t resign Gaudreau. Get a roster players that will play Sutter style of hockey.
13 déc. 2021 à 13 h 59
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,036
Mentions "j'aime": 7,746
Quoting: Ritzy

Depending on how Skinner progresses, if he still needs some time maybe EDM jumps on this. Not sure of the value.

Skinner has already proven himself and signed through next season, and Smith is under contract next year too. I don't see any scenario where Edmonton goes for this.
13 déc. 2021 à 14 h 0
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,036
Mentions "j'aime": 7,746
Quoting: MauriceArthur15
Just as much Toronto is in a cap crunch so is Edmonton. They need affordable and good goalies. Unfortunately it’s a lot harder finding a good goalie at a great cap hit for a lower cost.

Mrazek is neither affordable nor good.
Bringer_Of_Snow a aimé ceci.
13 déc. 2021 à 14 h 1
#9
Démarrer sujet
TopDawgReese
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,241
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: CD282
Skinner has already proven himself and signed through next season, and Smith is under contract next year too. I don't see any scenario where Edmonton goes for this.


Not really. Skinner proving himself is like saying Woll proved himself which isn’t the case. Smith can’t play more than 30-40 games with the wear and tear on his body and do you trust skinner playing that many. Y’all will need a 3 goalies minimum and Skinner is waiver exempt in pretty sure
13 déc. 2021 à 14 h 2
#10
Démarrer sujet
TopDawgReese
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,241
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: CD282
Mrazek is neither affordable nor good.


Great look at 3 games for the season in comparison how for his cap hit he had a positive GSAx since 2019…
13 déc. 2021 à 14 h 2
#11
Bringer_Of_Snow
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 1,422
Mentions "j'aime": 670
Quoting: CD282
Skinner has already proven himself and signed through next season, and Smith is under contract next year too. I don't see any scenario where Edmonton goes for this.


Pretty much this. Worst case scenario, we have Skinner/Smith next season. Preferably, we go get an actual start aged 25-30, then have Skinner as a backup and bury Smith.

One thing for sure is Mrazek has zero use to the Oilers. Not an upgrade on Koskinen this season, and oilers certainly don't need to be tied up with two more years of Mrazek after this season
CD282 a aimé ceci.
13 déc. 2021 à 14 h 3
#12
Bringer_Of_Snow
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 1,422
Mentions "j'aime": 670
Quoting: MauriceArthur15
Great look at 3 games for the season in comparison how for his cap hit he had a positive GSAx since 2019…


Seems like he'd be an ideal backup for the Leafs then. Better off keeping him no?
CD282 a aimé ceci.
13 déc. 2021 à 14 h 4
#13
Démarrer sujet
TopDawgReese
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,241
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: Bringer_Of_Snow
Pretty much this. Worst case scenario, we have Skinner/Smith next season. Preferably, we go get an actual start aged 25-30, then have Skinner as a backup and bury Smith.

One thing for sure is Mrazek has zero use to the Oilers. Not an upgrade on Koskinen this season, and oilers certainly don't need to be tied up with two more years of Mrazek after this season


Mrazek has a better GSAx than Freddie Anderson since 2019…

How y’all use 3 games to compare. That’s way to small of a sample size.
13 déc. 2021 à 14 h 6
#14
Démarrer sujet
TopDawgReese
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,241
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: Bringer_Of_Snow
Seems like he'd be an ideal backup for the Leafs then. Better off keeping him no?


Leafs don’t need to. They have 4 goalies that can play in the show rn. Woll, Kallgren, Campbell and Mrazek. It’s simple we can’t afford the luxury of Mrazek if we decide to keep the big 4 intact. We instead go with a cheaper option just in case our rookies hits some dry spell that we can rely on.
13 déc. 2021 à 14 h 7
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,036
Mentions "j'aime": 7,746
Quoting: MauriceArthur15
Mrazek has a better GSAx than Freddie Anderson since 2019…

How y’all use 3 games to compare. That’s way to small of a sample size.


Sure, when he was playing behind a top-3 defense corps. Means nothing in this context.
13 déc. 2021 à 14 h 8
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,036
Mentions "j'aime": 7,746
Quoting: MauriceArthur15
Not really. Skinner proving himself is like saying Woll proved himself which isn’t the case. Smith can’t play more than 30-40 games with the wear and tear on his body and do you trust skinner playing that many. Y’all will need a 3 goalies minimum and Skinner is waiver exempt in pretty sure


Skinner isn't waivers exempt next year.
13 déc. 2021 à 14 h 9
#17
Démarrer sujet
TopDawgReese
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,241
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: CD282
Sure, when he was playing behind a top-3 defense corps. Means nothing in this context.


You do realize that argument works against what you said. If he was bad he would have a negative GSAx as there would be a lack of expected goals against Carolina.
13 déc. 2021 à 14 h 10
#18
Démarrer sujet
TopDawgReese
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,241
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: CD282
Skinner isn't waivers exempt next year.


Damn y’all really messed up there in Edmonton. Yikes now y’all really need a strong starter for cheap.
13 déc. 2021 à 14 h 13
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,036
Mentions "j'aime": 7,746
Quoting: MauriceArthur15
You do realize that argument works against what you said. If he was bad he would have a negative GSAx as there would be a lack of expected goals against Carolina.

Only if you don't understand how xG works and that it's far from definitive. It's a tool, but it still needs context.
13 déc. 2021 à 14 h 15
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 1,549
Mentions "j'aime": 838
Quoting: MauriceArthur15
Not really. Skinner proving himself is like saying Woll proved himself which isn’t the case. Smith can’t play more than 30-40 games with the wear and tear on his body and do you trust skinner playing that many. Y’all will need a 3 goalies minimum and Skinner is waiver exempt in pretty sure


Skinner is not waiver exempt next year. Planning to carry 3 goalies is not typically a recipe for success... only 2 nets in practice and not much game time if you're splitting back-up games between 2 guys.
13 déc. 2021 à 14 h 18
#21
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: MauriceArthur15
Damn y’all really messed up there in Edmonton. Yikes now y’all really need a strong starter for cheap.


Heck, if they're going to pay Mrazek $3.8 mil, I'm sure they could just find $700K somewhere to sign that ridiculously team-friendly Campbell signing tears of joy They could just use that 2nd+4th that they're spending on Mrazek here, to dump someone instead.

Markstrom signed his UFA contract at the same age as Campbell will, and his run of success kind of mirrors Campbell's, in that he was a league average or below goaltender until he turned 28. Turned 2 good years into 6 x $6.
13 déc. 2021 à 14 h 19
#22
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: CD282
Only if you don't understand how xG works and that it's far from definitive. It's a tool, but it still needs context.


Just use what he wants for Mrazek to dump someone, and go steal Campbell at the ridiculously lowball offer that *some* Leafs fans think he'll sign for.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
13 déc. 2021 à 14 h 20
#23
Démarrer sujet
TopDawgReese
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,241
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: CD282
Only if you don't understand how xG works and that it's far from definitive. It's a tool, but it still needs context.


Carolina has been a top defensive team since their return to the playoffs. It’s hard to have a positive GSAx on a good team without being a good goalie. Even in the 3 games he’s played he’s barely negative and will probably be back to positive by end of the year. No context is required when it comes to xGF and GSAx.

Case and point Edmonton. Y’all don’t hold the xGF on a majority of your lines but have a lethal power play that compensates for the poor 5v5 and defensive play. It’s why most of your goalies have a negative GSAx
13 déc. 2021 à 14 h 24
#24
Démarrer sujet
TopDawgReese
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,241
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: Lenny7
Heck, if they're going to pay Mrazek $3.8 mil, I'm sure they could just find $700K somewhere to sign that ridiculously team-friendly Campbell signing tears of joy They could just use that 2nd+4th that they're spending on Mrazek here, to dump someone instead.

Markstrom signed his UFA contract at the same age as Campbell will, and his run of success kind of mirrors Campbell's, in that he was a league average or below goaltender until he turned 28. Turned 2 good years into 6 x $6.


Markstrom was proven goalie for 5+ years. Campbell hasn’t even played over 150 games as yet at 30 years old…

He’s a late bloomer but a 6x6 is was too unreasonable especially when Ullmark and Cal Peterson (a lot more comparable) got4.5-5.5 million range
13 déc. 2021 à 14 h 27
#25
Démarrer sujet
TopDawgReese
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,241
Mentions "j'aime": 253
Quoting: Lenny7
Just use what he wants for Mrazek to dump someone, and go steal Campbell at the ridiculously lowball offer that *some* Leafs fans think he'll sign for.


The funny part is even if we don’t resign Campbell we will find another Jack Campbell. Remember Toronto only got him for Trevor Moore and a 3rd.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage