SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Buffalo completes the rebuild

Créé par: tvh_0703
Équipe: 2021-22 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 30 sept. 2021
Publié: 30 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 055 363 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Bellows, Kieffer2 055 363 $
Choix de 3e ronde en 2022
Transactions
1.
2.
BUF
  1. Broberg, Philip
  2. Koskinen, Mikko
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Tarasenko, Vladimir (3 750 000 $ retained)
3.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de BUF
Logo de FLA
Logo de STL
Logo de EDM
Logo de BUF
Logo de LAK
Logo de BUF
Logo de NJD
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de PHI
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2581 500 000 $66 077 877 $113 916 $850 000 $15 422 123 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
2 055 363 $2 055 363 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 822 764 $2 822 764 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 sept. 2021 à 16 h 30
#1
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,403
Mentions "j'aime": 9,109
That Edmonton trade is a great way to kill Brobergs career, but other than that is fine. St. Louis fans wont like it though
A_K a aimé ceci.
30 sept. 2021 à 16 h 38
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,711
Mentions "j'aime": 6,216
No thanks from LA. I'd rather have Kupari than Olofsson.
30 sept. 2021 à 16 h 48
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
When you look at the oilers roster who do they need more tarasenko or kosk? I think it’s more likely smith will need help covering an 82 game season than oilers needing help scoring goals pretty sure that part is already well covered. Could take out broberg and the first oilers still have to decline it has nothing to do with value of assets it’s about what the team needs more currently that’s kosk.
30 sept. 2021 à 17 h 9
#4
Pistol Pete
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,140
Mentions "j'aime": 1,479
Edmonton doesn’t need a winger they need a goalie.
30 sept. 2021 à 17 h 36
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 143
Mentions "j'aime": 31
Quoting: Timmah007
When you look at the oilers roster who do they need more tarasenko or kosk? I think it’s more likely smith will need help covering an 82 game season than oilers needing help scoring goals pretty sure that part is already well covered. Could take out broberg and the first oilers still have to decline it has nothing to do with value of assets it’s about what the team needs more currently that’s kosk.


I agree Edmonton would need another goalie, but nothing is stopping them from trading for one. They'd save $0.75m in cap space with that trade and could then look for a goalie that's more capable than Koskinen or at least as capable and also cheaper. They could check in on goalies like Kahkonen, Vanacek (imo they should've made a play for either one before the expansion draft), Montembault, Korpisalo, etc. Washington gave up a 2nd to get Vanacek back, clearly they could have paid that.

Smith will be done soon and Koskinen won't cut it. Sooner or later they needed to trade Koskinen and find a better replacement. If they waive Stalock & Archibald, and make the trade I'm proposing then they'll still have $5.03m in cap space to find another goalie and take back salary, and their forwards will now be:
Hyman-McDavid-Puljujarvi
Foegele-Draisaitl-Tarasenko
Perlini-RNH-Yamamoto
Turris-Ryan-Kassian
(Shore, McLeod, Sceviour, Holloway, Marody, Benson, Lavoie)
30 sept. 2021 à 17 h 37
#6
Lets Go Blues
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 6,788
Mentions "j'aime": 4,341
Quoting: Shibbal18
That Edmonton trade is a great way to kill Brobergs career, but other than that is fine. St. Louis fans wont like it though


Yeah I don't love it, but if the neck thing disappears I see no reason to bash the trade value. Just looking at the Blues team for the future though, losing Thomas and Neighbours and adding a 10m long-term forward makes it extremely hard to keep the band together. It probably means no more Perron, no more ROR, no more Kyrou, and the guys that would fill around Eichel just got traded away for him. Basically, the window becomes 2 years, and then the team painfully dissolves to nothing but bad immovable contracts and a star center. Would be a fun ride though, and you could trade Eichel in 2 yrs to trigger the rebuild, which would be peak irony.
30 sept. 2021 à 17 h 39
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 143
Mentions "j'aime": 31
Quoting: Zmach
Edmonton doesn’t need a winger they need a goalie.


That's on them. They had loads of opportunities before the expansion draft seeing as they were one of the only teams without a goalie worth protecting. They could have gotten any number of quality goalies for dirt cheap.
30 sept. 2021 à 17 h 40
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 1,549
Mentions "j'aime": 838
Quoting: tvh_0703
I agree Edmonton would need another goalie, but nothing is stopping them from trading for one. They'd save $0.75m in cap space with that trade and could then look for a goalie that's more capable than Koskinen or at least as capable and also cheaper. They could check in on goalies like Kahkonen, Vanacek (imo they should've made a play for either one before the expansion draft), Montembault, Korpisalo, etc. Washington gave up a 2nd to get Vanacek back, clearly they could have paid that.

Smith will be done soon and Koskinen won't cut it. Sooner or later they needed to trade Koskinen and find a better replacement. If they waive Stalock & Archibald, and make the trade I'm proposing then they'll still have $5.03m in cap space to find another goalie and take back salary, and their forwards will now be:
Hyman-McDavid-Puljujarvi
Foegele-Draisaitl-Tarasenko
Perlini-RNH-Yamamoto
Turris-Ryan-Kassian
(Shore, McLeod, Sceviour, Holloway, Marody, Benson, Lavoie)


At the end of the day this forward roster can already score goals though. If the Oilers are going to look at trading a 1st and their best D prospect, they better be addressing their needs directly rather than adding to a position of strength.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
30 sept. 2021 à 17 h 48
#9
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,941
Mentions "j'aime": 25,740
Kupari for Olofsson would be an acceptable trade, but we don't really need another LW. Los Angeles declines before even discussing how slanted towards the Sabres this offer is. You can make a colorable argument that Olofsson is worth Kupari plus the second (personally, I don't think so), but Quick >>> Dell and that doesn't even bring Thomas into the picture.
30 sept. 2021 à 17 h 57
#10
Pistol Pete
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,140
Mentions "j'aime": 1,479
Quoting: tvh_0703
That's on them. They had loads of opportunities before the expansion draft seeing as they were one of the only teams without a goalie worth protecting. They could have gotten any number of quality goalies for dirt cheap.


Koskinen’s 4.5 million prevented them from signing a goalie.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
30 sept. 2021 à 17 h 57
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 143
Mentions "j'aime": 31
Quoting: A_K
Yeah I don't love it, but if the neck thing disappears I see no reason to bash the trade value. Just looking at the Blues team for the future though, losing Thomas and Neighbours and adding a 10m long-term forward makes it extremely hard to keep the band together. It probably means no more Perron, no more ROR, no more Kyrou, and the guys that would fill around Eichel just got traded away for him. Basically, the window becomes 2 years, and then the team painfully dissolves to nothing but bad immovable contracts and a star center. Would be a fun ride though, and you could trade Eichel in 2 yrs to trigger the rebuild, which would be peak irony.


With Eichel, Schenn, Buchnevich, Saad, Faulk, Krug, Parayko, and Binnington locked up long term, I don't expect it would prevent them from locking people up all that much. Likely lose Perron, but at 33 that might end up being better anyways since he could command more than he's worth. O'Reilly, Kyrou, Sundqvist, and Barbashev will need new contracts in 2 years, but the cap is also supposed to rise by $2m.

So $7m left in cap space (including current cap space after the trade) + their current contracts to sign those 4 players. That's enough to resign O'Reilly at $9m, Kyrou at $6m, Sundqvist at $4m, and Barbashev at $3m.
30 sept. 2021 à 18 h 0
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 143
Mentions "j'aime": 31
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Kupari for Olofsson would be an acceptable trade, but we don't really need another LW. Los Angeles declines before even discussing how slanted towards the Sabres this offer is. You can make a colorable argument that Olofsson is worth Kupari plus the second (personally, I don't think so), but Quick >>> Dell and that doesn't even bring Thomas into the picture.


My thoughts were Thomas + Kupari for Olofsson (maybe a pick instead of one of them is more fair). And Quick + 2nd for Dell considering if LA wants to be competitive in 2022-23 they'll need to rid themselves of Quick with Petersen starting his $5m contract.
30 sept. 2021 à 18 h 16
#13
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,941
Mentions "j'aime": 25,740
Quoting: tvh_0703
My thoughts were Thomas + Kupari for Olofsson (maybe a pick instead of one of them is more fair). And Quick + 2nd for Dell considering if LA wants to be competitive in 2022-23 they'll need to rid themselves of Quick with Petersen starting his $5m contract.


We don't need to rid ourselves of Quick with Edler and Maatta coming off the books and Brown probably getting re-upped for one year at appreciably less than his current ticket. Plus, the simple truth is that Quick is better than Dell.
1 oct. 2021 à 0 h 2
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,913
Mentions "j'aime": 562
Oilers easily decline
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage