SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Cap hell

Créé par: HOCKEYBOY448
Équipe: 2023-24 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 5 juill. 2021
Publié: 5 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I guess some combo of the guys I think will be gone and our picks will be used to acquire another top 6 or top 9 center imo. We need the cap to go up really bad.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3883 334 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
74 850 000 $
13 250 000 $
66 125 000 $
32 225 000 $
11 425 000 $
35 425 000 $
23 625 000 $
22 425 000 $
2825 000 $
2825 000 $
2825 000 $
21 525 000 $
78 125 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
77 850 000 $
31 650 000 $
21 475 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (DET)
DET
  1. Trouba, Jacob (2 750 000 $ retained)
2.
NYR
SEA
    Blackwell
    3.
    NYR
    SEA
    1. Buchnevich, Pavel [Droits de RFA]
    2. Georgiev, Alexandar [Droits de RFA]
    3. Hájek, Libor [Droits de RFA]
    4. Howden, Brett
    5. Jones, Zachary [Droits de RFA]
    Détails additionnels:
    Guys I think will be moved in the next year or so.
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de LAK
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    2022
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    2023
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de DET
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $79 887 916 $610 892 $1 365 000 $1 612 084 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    5 425 000 $5 425 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
    C
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    3 625 000 $3 625 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    2 225 000 $2 225 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    1 525 000 $1 525 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    AG
    RFA - 2
    1 475 000 $1 475 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    8 125 000 $8 125 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    883 334 $883 334 $
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    797 500 $797 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
    DG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
    DD
    RFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    825 000 $825 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    825 000 $825 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    825 000 $825 000 $
    DG
    RFA

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 50
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 460
    Mentions "j'aime": 182
    Seems kinda premature to hand out contracts like that to K'andre and Laf.

    Edit: NVM, didn't see the year
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 52
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,565
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
    Quoting: Jester9881
    Seems kinda premature to hand out contracts like that to K'andre and Laf.

    Edit: NVM, didn't see the year


    This is 23-24 projections.
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 52
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 6,325
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,559
    Quoting: Jester9881
    Seems kinda premature to hand out contracts like that to K'andre and Laf.


    K’andre is already playing at that level. Assuming he doesn’t fall off. It’s fine. Laf on the top line will be putting up more points and who knows which PP he is on. Not that unreasonable to assume.
    Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 53
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 6,325
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,559
    Don’t forget we are likely drafting a top C type player this year and maybe next year. Those prospects could easily fill in 3C in a few years
    HOCKEYBOY448 a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 56
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,565
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
    Quoting: NYR1983
    Don’t forget we are likely drafting a top C type player this year and maybe next year. Those prospects could easily fill in 3C in a few years


    I really hope we send a big package to trade up and take Mason McTavish. I feel like he’s gonna be great.
    NYR1983 a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 56
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 6,325
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,559
    My bet is on Raty or Svechkov
    HOCKEYBOY448 a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 15 h 57
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,565
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
    Quoting: NYR1983
    My bet is on Raty or Svechkov


    I think if we grab one of McTavish or Raty, we’ll be good long term.
    NYR1983 a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 16 h 2
    #8
    MGITBPITNHL
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,507
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
    Is Trouba tradeable in 2023-24? I thought it was 2024-25.
    Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 16 h 13
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 10,776
    Mentions "j'aime": 8,339
    Quoting: mhroblak
    Is Trouba tradeable in 2023-24? I thought it was 2024-25.


    NMC until 24-25. 15 team no trade list for that year. 12 for the next. Don't see him waving even though I expect Detroit to be a playoff team by then.
    5 juill. 2021 à 16 h 19
    #10
    MGITBPITNHL
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 3,507
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,535
    Quoting: Lancebmx
    NMC until 24-25. 15 team no trade list for that year. 12 for the next. Don't see him waving even though I expect Detroit to be a playoff team by then.


    So he's not tradeable in 23-24 without waiving.
    Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 16 h 19
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,565
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
    Quoting: mhroblak
    Is Trouba tradeable in 2023-24? I thought it was 2024-25.


    Quoting: Lancebmx
    NMC until 24-25. 15 team no trade list for that year. 12 for the next. Don't see him waving even though I expect Detroit to be a playoff team by then.


    Someone’s gotta go. If he doesn’t waive, I’d buy him out cause we need the cap space and I’m not losing a young guy cause of him. Doesn’t matter how loved he may be. Team comes first.
    Masonh618 a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 16 h 19
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,565
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
    Quoting: mhroblak
    So he's not tradeable in 23-24 without waiving.


    Yes.
    5 juill. 2021 à 16 h 27
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2020
    Messages: 4,901
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
    Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
    I really hope we send a big package to trade up and take Mason McTavish. I feel like he’s gonna be great.


    SJS might want to trade down and pick up more assets. Theyre prospect cupboard is empty.
    Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 16 h 30
    #14
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,565
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
    Quoting: Islesforthecup
    SJS might want to trade down and pick up more assets. Theyre prospect cupboard is empty.


    I wasn’t dealing in hypotheticals, I was tryna get a picture of what the cap would look for us. I don’t think we should trade for Hertl cause of the lack of cap space (he’s gonna want at least $7 mil, which we don’t have). We need another center on an ELC to play in our top 9.
    5 juill. 2021 à 16 h 33
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2020
    Messages: 4,901
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
    Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
    I wasn’t dealing in hypotheticals, I was tryna get a picture of what the cap would look for us. I don’t think we should trade for Hertl cause of the lack of cap space (he’s gonna want at least $7 mil, which we don’t have). We need another center on an ELC to play in our top 9.


    No to move up to 7 OA for mctavish. I dont see LAK, VAN, OTT, or CHI moving down. By that time mctavish is probably gone.
    Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 16 h 41
    #16
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,565
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
    Quoting: Islesforthecup
    No to move up to 7 OA for mctavish. I dont see LAK, VAN, OTT, or CHI moving down. By that time mctavish is probably gone.


    I think if we included our first this year, Buch and Jones we could do it. Most of those teams are looking to progress their rebuilds.
    5 juill. 2021 à 16 h 49
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2020
    Messages: 4,901
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
    Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
    I think if we included our first this year, Buch and Jones we could do it. Most of those teams are looking to progress their rebuilds.


    I dont think it will cost that much tbh. Its a weak draft plus the scouting was all ****ed up which makes it easier to miss. Then add the fact that the dropoff happens right after the rangers pick (around 17-18 imo) and teams might rather move back and get a sure prospect (prospects bust obviously but its a sure thing compared to the draft). Also i wasnt saying prospect as only 1 but i think something around schneider and a pick could get it done.
    5 juill. 2021 à 17 h 4
    #18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2016
    Messages: 1,739
    Mentions "j'aime": 971
    Wings pass, that contract stinks and right D is literally the only thing they don't need
    5 juill. 2021 à 17 h 5
    #19
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,565
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
    Quoting: Islesforthecup
    I dont think it will cost that much tbh. Its a weak draft plus the scouting was all ****ed up which makes it easier to miss. Then add the fact that the dropoff happens right after the rangers pick (around 17-18 imo) and teams might rather move back and get a sure prospect (prospects bust obviously but its a sure thing compared to the draft). Also i wasnt saying prospect as only 1 but i think something around schneider and a pick could get it done.


    I’d prefer to keep Schneider and Robertson cause they are bigger bodies who play physical and skate well. I’d prefer to move away from someone like Jones who is much smaller. We’d have Fox and Lundkvist as our smaller offensive minded defenseman. With Lindgren, Miller, Robertson and Schneider we’d have guys with size who can move well.
    Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 17 h 5
    #20
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,565
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
    Quoting: Drw4209
    Wings pass, that contract stinks and right D is literally the only thing they don't need


    If it’s not them or another team it’s fine. We’d just buy him out at that point to create cap room.
    5 juill. 2021 à 17 h 22
    #21
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2020
    Messages: 4,901
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
    Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
    I’d prefer to keep Schneider and Robertson cause they are bigger bodies who play physical and skate well. I’d prefer to move away from someone like Jones who is much smaller. We’d have Fox and Lundkvist as our smaller offensive minded defenseman. With Lindgren, Miller, Robertson and Schneider we’d have guys with size who can move well.


    I was just talking value. Also thought that since trouba cant be moved till 24-25, he would be that big guy who can move on the right instead of schneider. Maybe something around jones and a better pick.
    5 juill. 2021 à 17 h 24
    #22
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2020
    Messages: 4,901
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
    Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
    I’d prefer to keep Schneider and Robertson cause they are bigger bodies who play physical and skate well. I’d prefer to move away from someone like Jones who is much smaller. We’d have Fox and Lundkvist as our smaller offensive minded defenseman. With Lindgren, Miller, Robertson and Schneider we’d have guys with size who can move well.


    Also for something completely random, what would kravtsov cost from the islanders this offseason (21). Obvs you would keep buch then.
    5 juill. 2021 à 17 h 24
    #23
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 6,565
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,279
    Quoting: Islesforthecup
    I was just talking value. Also thought that since trouba cant be moved till 24-25, he would be that big guy who can move on the right instead of schneider. Maybe something around jones and a better pick.


    I personally love Trouba. If he wasn’t making $8 mil I wouldn’t move him. If he was only making $6 mil I’d keep for sure cause I love how he lays the game with an edge. That extra $2 mil is the issue. Same thing with Kreider. Other than length of contract and maybe an extra $750k, if he was making $5.5 mil I’d love to keep him as well. The only problem is the damn flat cap screwing us over.
    Islesforthecup a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 17 h 26
    #24
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2020
    Messages: 4,901
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
    Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
    I personally love Trouba. If he wasn’t making $8 mil I wouldn’t move him. If he was only making $6 mil I’d keep for sure cause I love how he lays the game with an edge. That extra $2 mil is the issue. Same thing with Kreider. Other than length of contract and maybe an extra $750k, if he was making $5.5 mil I’d love to keep him as well. The only problem is the damn flat cap screwing us over.


    It ****ed everyone who was trying to compete.
    HOCKEYBOY448 a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2021 à 17 h 27
    #25
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2020
    Messages: 4,901
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
    Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
    I personally love Trouba. If he wasn’t making $8 mil I wouldn’t move him. If he was only making $6 mil I’d keep for sure cause I love how he lays the game with an edge. That extra $2 mil is the issue. Same thing with Kreider. Other than length of contract and maybe an extra $750k, if he was making $5.5 mil I’d love to keep him as well. The only problem is the damn flat cap screwing us over.


    Honestly contracts aside, a pelech-trouba pairing would be so ****in scary to play against.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage