1 | | - | | Safe pick. Oh no, BUF turns everything in busts lol. |
2 | | - | | One of the youngest prospects, but SEA can wait. |
3 | | - | | 1-2 C tandem with Zegras, expect him to be playoff performer. |
4 | | - | | NJD need top RD and Clarke is exactly that. Draft him even if Hughes would be available. |
5 | | - | | Projected no. 2 C and CBJ need C prospects. Shane Wright next year? |
6 | | - | | With no top C available left, Yzerman picks safely. |
7 | | - | | 9 of 9 SJS's 2020 picks were Fs. Edvinsson is potential bust, but aging core forces SJS to risk. |
8 | | - | | Safe pick. LA doesn't need another F, but he can either play or be future trade piece. |
9 | | - | | Homeboy. It didn't end well with last time (Virtanen), will now be different? |
10 | | - | | Scoring RW for deep F group in OTT. Should be more physical. |
11 | | - | | Choix au repêchage retiré |
12 | | - | | Offensive RW from Chicago Steel. CHI is not affraid to draft smaller players. |
13 | | - | | Scoring RW/C. CGY bsolutely can use goal-scorer in their system. |
14 | | - | | PHI pulls a trigger on a potential no. 1 G after Hart. Could trade down for a few spots. |
15 | | - | | DAL need help on D. Ceulemans is the only D left who is potentialy worth no. 15 pick. |
16 | | - | | NYR need Cs. Sillinger is one of more complete players, despite being slower. |
17 | | - | | STL could take one of the better offensive players. Younger prospect, years away from NHL. |
18 | | - | | Perfetti will soon move from AHL to NHL. Pinelli would be decent replacement. |
19 | | - | | NAS need Cs. With Askarov in club they could be looking for another RUS player (or couple). |
20 | | - | | Potential injury-prone player. High risk – modest reward player. Might be drafted even earlier. |
21 | | - | | BOS need Cs. It is likely too much to expect him to become 1 C, but some still hope. |
22 | | - | | I assume MIN was hoping for Cossa. RW Lysell has potential, but struggles against men. |
23 | | | | Without top C available, DET might develope one at their own. Size also matters. |
24 | | - | | Good offensive player in SWE U-20, but has yet to thrive against men. |
25 | | | | Smaller Ds are risky, but his offensive output looks promising. |
26 | | | | Another RW for MIN. Lysell is skilled, Boucher is physical. Lower risk – lower reward pick. |
27 | | - | | Decent point producer. Last season 33G, 38A in 63GP, this season 20G, 20A in 29GP. |
28 | | - | | COL like skating D-man. Zellweger's offense looks promising, despite small sample size. |
29 | | | | Klimovich will nicely complement strong C core. NJD could become cup candidate in few years. |
30 | | - | | That big and strong players are rare. I wouldn't be surprised if he goes in top 20. |
31 | | - | | Poor-man's McTavish. Can be physical despite not being big player. Possible playoff performer. |
32 | | | | Excellent WJC-18. Typical RUS winger with skill and speed. |