SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

trying a couple different thangs

Créé par: Bdawwwgy1
Équipe: 2021-22 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 23 juin 2021
Publié: 24 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
17 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
43 800 000 $
2975 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
13 250 000 $
Offres hostiles
Le salaire annuel moyen (AAV) de l'offre hostile est calculé en divisant la valeur totale du contrat par: 1. La durée totale du contrat, ou 2. Cinq ans
JOUEURAAVCOMPENSATION
Dunn, Vince3 800 000 $
Choix de 2e ronde en 2022
Transactions
1.
CBJ
  1. Dellandrea, Ty
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (DAL)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
Détails additionnels:
Della seems to be outdepthed and Bourque is probably better at this point.
DAL
  1. Jones, Seth
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
2.
CBJ
  1. Murphy, Connor
  2. Strome, Dylan
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
Murphy extends 5 x 4.75. hometown kid. this trade happens hypothetically when Chicago signs Dougie.
CHI
  1. Bemström, Emil
  2. Kukan, Dean
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
24 OA
3.
4.
CBJ
  1. Koskinen, Mikko
  2. Turris, Kyle
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
improve that proposterously terrible bottom 6
5.
CBJ
  1. Benson, Tyler [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
forgot to include
EDM
6.
CBJ
SEA
    notes - cbj take Clarke Lucius Svechkov and Peart in first round

    goodrow is way overpaid for 1 year, promised to be traded at tdl if team isnt competitive

    i really like greg hoffman but i dont think he could be more than a 3rd liner, so he might start the season there but would get pushed down
    7.
    CBJ
    SEA
      i wasnt sure whether or not to trade tampas first for dunn or if i should just OS, because honestly it wouldnt be surprising if STL values CBJ's 2022 second over tampas 2021 first
      Rachats de contrats
      Enfoui
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2021
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de DAL
      Logo de TBL
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de VAN
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de NJD
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de CBJ
      2022
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de DAL
      Logo de TBL
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de TOR
      Logo de ANA
      2023
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de CBJ
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2381 500 000 $65 160 029 $0 $537 500 $16 339 971 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
      C, AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      900 000 $900 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      1 838 362 $1 838 362 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
      AD, AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Stars de Dallas
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
      AD
      RFA - 2
      975 000 $975 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      AG, C, AD
      RFA - 3
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      AG, C, AD
      UFA - 2
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
      3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 2
      3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      1 325 000 $1 325 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      750 000 $750 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      975 000 $975 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      24 juin 2021 à 0 h 12
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2018
      Messages: 484
      Mentions "j'aime": 372
      Dallas does it if Jones re-signs otherwise they pass, that's a lot to give up for one year.
      24 juin 2021 à 0 h 16
      #2
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2019
      Messages: 5,933
      Mentions "j'aime": 6,506
      Quoting: WallStreet83
      Dallas does it if Jones re-signs otherwise they pass, that's a lot to give up for one year.


      On the flip side, if jones agrees to an extension before the trade then dallas has to give up a lot more than that
      24 juin 2021 à 0 h 16
      #3
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2019
      Messages: 4,986
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
      This is too much for CHI to give up.
      ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
      24 juin 2021 à 0 h 18
      #4
      Dekesaladekes
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2021
      Messages: 3,064
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,107
      why would they value a 2nd over a first? even if tampa won the cup and the pick was 31st overall its still better then any 2nd rounder, I know they say next yrs draft is deeper in terms of talents but thats also because half the players in this yrs draft didn't get a season the only way to improve your draft rank was WJ really so players had about 6-11 games to prove their worth. Next yrs draft is also just said to be deeper because of the 3 headed monster that headlines the draft "wright, lambert, savoie" which isn't even really 3 headed monster now, wright broke off from those 2 this season proving his dominance while savoie jumped between 3 leagues and wasm't really a standout player in any of them, and lambert had a decent season in the finish league but went quiet in both the u20 and u18 tournaments.
      24 juin 2021 à 0 h 29
      #5
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 19,391
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,943
      Hawks decline this. Strome is worth a 2nd and 3rd, Murphy easily a 1st. Hawks aren't giving up Murphy and Hamilton is hardly a replacement for Murphy. Hawks need more Murphy style of players, not more Hamilton style of players and certainly wouldn't give up a stay at home for another puck mover.
      24 juin 2021 à 0 h 38
      #6
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2020
      Messages: 325
      Mentions "j'aime": 105
      Koskinen posted better numbers than Korpi, don’t think the difference between Turris & Jenner is a first.

      That’s just my opinion, I know a lot of oil fans on here are quick to trade Koskinen for anything.
      24 juin 2021 à 0 h 48
      #7
      Démarrer sujet
      CbjSabresDucks
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2020
      Messages: 4,729
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,181
      Quoting: PerpetuallySad
      Koskinen posted better numbers than Korpi, don’t think the difference between Turris & Jenner is a first.

      That’s just my opinion, I know a lot of oil fans on here are quick to trade Koskinen for anything.


      foligno is much worse and just got a 1st and a 4th. korpisalo was incredible just last year and 1.7m cheaper than koski.

      Korpi > Koski by a smallish margin, but Jenner > turris by a pretty large margin
      24 juin 2021 à 0 h 49
      #8
      Démarrer sujet
      CbjSabresDucks
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2020
      Messages: 4,729
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,181
      Quoting: Dekes
      why would they value a 2nd over a first? even if tampa won the cup and the pick was 31st overall its still better then any 2nd rounder, I know they say next yrs draft is deeper in terms of talents but thats also because half the players in this yrs draft didn't get a season the only way to improve your draft rank was WJ really so players had about 6-11 games to prove their worth. Next yrs draft is also just said to be deeper because of the 3 headed monster that headlines the draft "wright, lambert, savoie" which isn't even really 3 headed monster now, wright broke off from those 2 this season proving his dominance while savoie jumped between 3 leagues and wasm't really a standout player in any of them, and lambert had a decent season in the finish league but went quiet in both the u20 and u18 tournaments.



      because tampa might value a 28-31th OA less than a 35-40 OA depending on the draft class and especially considering the notion that next year is much deeper.
      24 juin 2021 à 0 h 57
      #9
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2020
      Messages: 325
      Mentions "j'aime": 105
      Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
      foligno is much worse and just got a 1st and a 4th. korpisalo was incredible just last year and 1.7m cheaper than koski.

      Korpi > Koski by a smallish margin, but Jenner > turris by a pretty large margin


      He’s never been incredible in terms of GSAx, benefited a lot from Torts system. When that system crumbles so does he (see this year)
      With the money available coming into FA I don’t see the appeal of giving a first for Boone & a statistically worse goalie.
      Don’t think it works but that’s my opinion
      Gregzky a aimé ceci.
      24 juin 2021 à 1 h 6
      #10
      Démarrer sujet
      CbjSabresDucks
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2020
      Messages: 4,729
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,181
      Quoting: PerpetuallySad
      He’s never been incredible in terms of GSAx, benefited a lot from Torts system. When that system crumbles so does he (see this year)
      With the money available coming into FA I don’t see the appeal of giving a first for Boone & a statistically worse goalie.
      Don’t think it works but that’s my opinion


      koski and korpi were really close this year, korpi has been great more recently than koski, and korpi is just 1 year removed from a fantastic season. i agree with you but hockey gms like holland will def pay for korpi
      24 juin 2021 à 2 h 0
      #11
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: oct. 2020
      Messages: 325
      Mentions "j'aime": 105
      Quoting: Bdawwwgy1
      koski and korpi were really close this year, korpi has been great more recently than koski, and korpi is just 1 year removed from a fantastic season. i agree with you but hockey gms like holland will def pay for korpi


      Koskinen has better numbers than Korpi every year from the past 3 years, better Sv%, better GSAx
      Even Korpis “incredible year” he was statistically worse than Koskinen.
      You’re making claims that aren’t backed up by any statistic
      Gregzky a aimé ceci.
      24 juin 2021 à 7 h 29
      #12
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2021
      Messages: 608
      Mentions "j'aime": 229
      Quoting: PerpetuallySad
      Koskinen has better numbers than Korpi every year from the past 3 years, better Sv%, better GSAx
      Even Korpis “incredible year” he was statistically worse than Koskinen.
      You’re making claims that aren’t backed up by any statistic


      100% correct, the only thing better about Korpisalo is his contract.....and even then he's over paid. Koskinen isn't as bad as people think, its just his bad games (and every goalie has them) are really bad. Not saying he's a quality #1 but if he made 1.5-2 mil as a back up people would hold him in higher regard.
      PerpetuallySad a aimé ceci.
      24 juin 2021 à 9 h 51
      #13
      True Reverse Retro
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2018
      Messages: 4,673
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,064
      Quoting: WallStreet83
      Dallas does it if Jones re-signs otherwise they pass, that's a lot to give up for one year.


      Quoting: SociallyHawkward
      On the flip side, if jones agrees to an extension before the trade then dallas has to give up a lot more than that


      On the flip flip side, if Dallas picks up Jones it’s going to be damn near impossible to get Klingberg & Jones both signed to extensions next offseason.

      That’s a lot to give up for one year of Jones OR essentially being forced to lose Klingberg.
      WallStreet83 a aimé ceci.
      24 juin 2021 à 10 h 16
      #14
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2019
      Messages: 1,549
      Mentions "j'aime": 838
      Quoting: Gregzky
      100% correct, the only thing better about Korpisalo is his contract.....and even then he's over paid. Koskinen isn't as bad as people think, its just his bad games (and every goalie has them) are really bad. Not saying he's a quality #1 but if he made 1.5-2 mil as a back up people would hold him in higher regard.


      For sure, would much rather stick with Koskinen and Turris than throw in a 1st to make that deal. If they Oilers are dumping Koskinen, it's to get a goalie that can play in a tandem in Smith. Not trying to get another back-up. And if we're spending a first, it's for a significant move, not a lateral move.
      Gregzky a aimé ceci.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage