SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TML Transformation

Créé par: Trevorchef
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 18 juin 2021
Publié: 18 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Goodrow and Coleman likely get more if there are enough suitors with cap space.

I wouldn't do this if I were Pittsburgh. They most likely wouldn't either.

Relax in advance Rielly lovers. He isn't worth much more than that as a player with one year left before UFA status. If it is a sign and trade or an extension is worked out in advance then maybe they could get more.

I have no use at all for either Mikheyev or Engvall. They are both overpaid 4th liners.

Seattle can have both Kerfoot and Dermott if they are willing to send back a 3rd. (Two decent pieces for them to get started with).

Unlikely Bernier would want to return to TO, so, pick your poison there. (1.5 to 2.0 million).

All in all, this team is much more balanced IMO.

There is no reason that they can't have highly skilled players in the top six and still fill out a competitive and balanced team if they are willing to get off of that "we are not trading a core player" crap.

Overvaluing your own is just as dangerous as moving off of one of them IMO.

Meh, whatever, let the complaining begin...
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
78 800 000 $
32 250 000 $
2900 000 $
21 500 000 $
11 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
12 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SEA)
2.
TOR
    Expansion Draft.
    SEA
    1. Dermott, Travis [Droits de RFA]
    3.
    TOR
    1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (NJD)
    4.
    TOR
    1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
    5.
    TOR
    1. Copp, Andrew [Droits de RFA]
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (WPG)
    6.
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2021
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2022
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de TOR
    2023
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2281 500 000 $78 950 116 $0 $400 000 $2 549 884 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 6
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C, AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 2
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    725 000 $725 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    8 800 000 $8 800 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    894 167 $894 167 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
    DD
    RFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    18 juin 2021 à 15 h 45
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 325
    Mentions "j'aime": 105
    Why would teams give up assets for overpayed 4th liners in the flat cap era?
    Nhl_oilers a aimé ceci.
    18 juin 2021 à 15 h 50
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 2,449
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,275
    Quoting: PerpetuallySad
    Why would teams give up assets for overpayed 4th liners in the flat cap era?


    Some teams will place higher value on players who will help them get to the cap floor and still play a regular shift. That is a fact and those teams are out there, even in a flat cap era.
    18 juin 2021 à 15 h 52
    #3
    Llinder2016
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 1,562
    Mentions "j'aime": 262
    I would absolutely do that WPG trade. I love what Copp does but I honestly think they keep him Him, Lowry and Appleton is a nice line for them
    Trevorchef et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    18 juin 2021 à 15 h 52
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: févr. 2021
    Messages: 2,391
    Mentions "j'aime": 554
    Ya, the Pens probably wouldn’t do this.

    Sid would be pissed if the traded Guentzel. So they probably won’t.

    Pens organization says they are looking for size, defense and a backup vet goalie. Guentzel is better defensively and plays more physical than Marner. The organization would probably rather Guentzel. I know Sid would.

    And the Pens like every competitive team right now are up against this flat cap. They are trying to shed salary, not take on. They are cash strapped and have RFAs to sign.I don’t think taking on Marner’s contract would be an option for them. Especially losing 2 top 6’s in the process too.
    Trevorchef a aimé ceci.
    18 juin 2021 à 15 h 53
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 2,449
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,275
    Quoting: SDSUFRATMAN
    I would absolutely do that WPG trade. I love what Copp does but I honestly think they keep him Him, Lowry and Appleton is a nice line for them


    You are most likely correct. They could use a puck mover on the left side D though. Hence the suggestion. Lots to it. Extension would be critical.
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    18 juin 2021 à 15 h 53
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 8,133
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,299
    The only player I would actually want from Toronto that wouldn’t cost a arm and a leg to get it Alex Kerfoot. No one else.
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    18 juin 2021 à 15 h 56
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 2,449
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,275
    Quoting: Nhl_oilers
    The only player I would actually want from Toronto that wouldn’t cost a arm and a leg to get it Alex Kerfoot. No one else.


    I wouldn't be so sure about that to be honest. The oilers need forward depth.

    That could just as easily be any team so, don't read too much into it from an oiler perspective.
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    18 juin 2021 à 15 h 57
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 8,133
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,299
    Quoting: Trevorchef
    I wouldn't be so sure about that to be honest. The oilers need forward depth.

    That could just as easily be any team so, don't read too much into it from an oiler perspective.


    We do need depth, but he’s the only guy that fills a hole in our lineup that wouldn’t cost a fortune to get.
    18 juin 2021 à 15 h 58
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 1,549
    Mentions "j'aime": 838
    Quoting: Trevorchef
    Some teams will place higher value on players who will help them get to the cap floor and still play a regular shift. That is a fact and those teams are out there, even in a flat cap era.


    The Oilers most definitely aren't a team trying to get to the cap floor. The Oilers are trying to improve a roster and spend to the cap... Engvall does nothing for us. Wouldn't take him for future consideration much less send a pick for him.
    18 juin 2021 à 16 h 2
    #10
    Once a Kings Fan Too
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 41,149
    Mentions "j'aime": 25,913
    Some good ideas here as always, Trevor. Whether one agrees with them or not, they're food for thought.
    Trevorchef a aimé ceci.
    18 juin 2021 à 16 h 8
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 2,449
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,275
    Quoting: rpain
    The Oilers most definitely aren't a team trying to get to the cap floor. The Oilers are trying to improve a roster and spend to the cap... Engvall does nothing for us. Wouldn't take him for future consideration much less send a pick for him.


    As I said in a previous response... that could be any team. Don't read too much into it having anything to do with the Oilers. Just pretend its another team. The jist of the concept literally has NOTHING to do with a low level pick coming back from Edmonton. The Oilers trade, in this case, has very little to do with the idea.
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    18 juin 2021 à 16 h 10
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 2,449
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,275
    Quoting: OldNYIfan
    Some good ideas here as always, Trevor. Whether one agrees with them or not, they're food for thought.


    I like food for thought.

    I don't see anything wrong with thinking outside of the box. Falling in love with your own players is as much of a curse as it is a blessing. It can blind people to the reality of the situation.

    Thanks bro! Cheers.
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    18 juin 2021 à 16 h 19
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2020
    Messages: 16,367
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,275
    I think the Jets would consider it, but only if Copp won't re-sign in Winnipeg.
    Trevorchef a aimé ceci.
    18 juin 2021 à 16 h 21
    #14
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 2,449
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,275
    Quoting: Windjammer
    I think the Jets would consider it, but only if Copp won't re-sign in Winnipeg.


    It is a real hockey trade IMO. Win/Win on both sides providing there is an extension for Rielly.

    I think the return is fair too.
    Windjammer a aimé ceci.
    18 juin 2021 à 16 h 44
    #15
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 712
    Mentions "j'aime": 162
    Quoting: LetsGoPens69
    Ya, the Pens probably wouldn’t do this.

    Sid would be pissed if the traded Guentzel. So they probably won’t.

    Pens organization says they are looking for size, defense and a backup vet goalie. Guentzel is better defensively and plays more physical than Marner. The organization would probably rather Guentzel. I know Sid would.

    And the Pens like every competitive team right now are up against this flat cap. They are trying to shed salary, not take on. They are cash strapped and have RFAs to sign.I don’t think taking on Marner’s contract would be an option for them. Especially losing 2 top 6’s in the process too.


    Yup Marner is not Brian Burke material. Not a bad trade though, I think it's fair honestly.
    Trevorchef a aimé ceci.
    18 juin 2021 à 16 h 49
    #16
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 2,449
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,275
    Quoting: PeterK
    Yup Marner is not Brian Burke material. Not a bad trade though, I think it's fair honestly.


    There are a lot of pros and cons on both sides and I truly understand not wanting to do it from both sides.

    Like I said earlier, I doubt that Pittsburgh would do it. I just like the idea of the "what if" aspects.

    Highly unlikely but, I do like the thought process.
    18 juin 2021 à 18 h 3
    #17
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 325
    Mentions "j'aime": 105
    Quoting: Trevorchef
    Some teams will place higher value on players who will help them get to the cap floor and still play a regular shift. That is a fact and those teams are out there, even in a flat cap era.


    You think teams reaching the cap floor are spending assets to do that instead of weaponizing that cap space?
    18 juin 2021 à 18 h 29
    #18
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2018
    Messages: 2,449
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,275
    Quoting: PerpetuallySad
    You think teams reaching the cap floor are spending assets to do that instead of weaponizing that cap space?


    Both will happen. There will be teams that make deals to get players that they feel they need and there will be teams that choose to use their cap space to better their chances accumulating assets.

    You can take that to the bank. It happens every year.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage