SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Peace Out Jack

Créé par: Smithcd995
Équipe: 2021-22 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 16 juin 2021
Publié: 17 juin 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Future roster guys shown on the taxi squad
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
24 500 000 $
22 500 000 $
22 100 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
49 500 000 $
25 500 000 $
23 250 000 $
34 500 000 $
13 000 000 $
13 200 000 $
22 500 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Power, Owen
3925 000 $
Eklund, William
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Henrique, Adam
  2. Zegras, Trevor
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
ANA
2.
PIT
  1. Ristolainen, Rasmus (1 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
3.
4.
BUF
  1. Dubé, Dillon [Droits de RFA]
CGY
  1. Olofsson, Victor
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de BUF
Logo de ANA
Logo de BUF
Logo de FLA
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de BUF
Logo de COL
Logo de BUF
2022
Logo de BUF
Logo de ANA
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $75 281 000 $113 916 $1 700 000 $6 219 000 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 3
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
G
UFA - 4
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Power, Owen
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
Eklund, William
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
778 333 $778 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
889 166 $889 166 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
886 667 $886 667 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
764 167 $764 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 juin 2021 à 15 h 14
#1
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,409
Mentions "j'aime": 10,720
Flames decline
17 juin 2021 à 15 h 18
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 657
Mentions "j'aime": 352
Is there a copy and paste?
Zegras isn’t being moved
KINGS67 a aimé ceci.
17 juin 2021 à 15 h 20
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 62
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: Gmonwy
Flames decline


Why
17 juin 2021 à 15 h 46
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 591
Mentions "j'aime": 208
Quoting: QuackAttack
Is there a copy and paste?
Zegras isn’t being moved


Eichel is 10x the player Zegras will ever be.
Smithcd995 a aimé ceci.
17 juin 2021 à 15 h 47
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 657
Mentions "j'aime": 352
Quoting: Elevatorboy
Eichel is 10x the player Zegras will ever be.


At least his career won’t be wasted in Buffacrap 💀
17 juin 2021 à 16 h 0
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: QuackAttack
Is there a copy and paste?
Zegras isn’t being moved


Hard to see the Ducks getting Eichel without giving up 2 of Drysdale, Zegras or 3OA.
Buffalojonny a aimé ceci.
17 juin 2021 à 16 h 10
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: FanOfBread
Why

1) Dube is a better ES producer, almost half of Olofsson's career production is on the PP and he wouldn't have PP1 time in Calgary.
2) Dube is 3 years younger
3) Dube will be signed to a lower cap hit than Olofsson

Sure the 2nd would be nice, but the Flames aren't rebuilding so downgrading makes no sense.
17 juin 2021 à 16 h 22
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 554
I doubt Ana trades top 5 pick this season. Even for Eichel or Reinhart.
17 juin 2021 à 16 h 23
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 62
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: Lunatik
1) Dube is a better ES producer, almost half of Olofsson's career production is on the PP and he wouldn't have PP1 time in Calgary.
2) Dube is 3 years younger
3) Dube will be signed to a lower cap hit than Olofsson

Sure the 2nd would be nice, but the Flames aren't rebuilding so downgrading makes no sense.


Olofsson's possession numbers are better, Sutter likes those guys.
Dube has been mediocre at best in three seasons, Olofsson has almost doubled his production in less games played
It's so far from a downgrade it is crazy. Dube is a middle six at best. Olofsson immediately makes the Flames PP 2 better, arguably this was Olafsson's worst statistical season on a really bad team and he was still better than Dube in his best season so far in regards to possession and production.

At absolute dog shirt worst for the Flames it's lateral and they get a more productive player right now.

Calling it a downgrade is incredibly biased and really wrong, the second shouldn't even be in there, if they aren't rebuilding they should take the player that makes them more dangerous right away as opposed to the player that could possibly produce at that level in a couple years. Once again all around bad take from the Flames top group of little minions
17 juin 2021 à 16 h 23
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Penguins would IMO decline without hesitation. There is no room financially in the back-end for Risto. We had an older version of Risto in Jack Johnson and got rid of him. Not going back.
17 juin 2021 à 16 h 45
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: FanOfBread
Olofsson's possession numbers are better, Sutter likes those guys.
Dube has been mediocre at best in three seasons, Olofsson has almost doubled his production in less games played
It's so far from a downgrade it is crazy. Dube is a middle six at best. Olofsson immediately makes the Flames PP 2 better, arguably this was Olafsson's worst statistical season on a really bad team and he was still better than Dube in his best season so far in regards to possession and production.

At absolute dog shirt worst for the Flames it's lateral and they get a more productive player right now.

Calling it a downgrade is incredibly biased and really wrong, the second shouldn't even be in there, if they aren't rebuilding they should take the player that makes them more dangerous right away as opposed to the player that could possibly produce at that level in a couple years. Once again all around bad take from the Flames top group of little minions


Olofsson is only more productive because he gets top PP minutes at ES he was less productive despite playing more. In Calgary Olofsson wouldn't get top PP minutes, thus he'd end up being less productive overall. As for "possession", I don't give two ****s until they start measuring it in time like it should be.

At best it is a lateral move with up to double the cap hit, It's a bad move.
17 juin 2021 à 16 h 56
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 62
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: Lunatik
Olofsson is only more productive because he gets top PP minutes at ES he was less productive despite playing more. In Calgary Olofsson wouldn't get top PP minutes, thus he'd end up being less productive overall. As for "possession", I don't give two ****s until they start measuring it in time like it should be.

At best it is a lateral move with up to double the cap hit, It's a bad move, but I'm not surprised you'd support a bad trade.


So you'd argue that Olofsson's increased playing time is the reason he has significantly less giveaways last season? Points per 60, Olofsson still out produced. Over the last three seasons Olofsson out produced Dube at even strength in less games, and significantly out produced him on the power play, it's almost as if a team in the bottom third of the league in PP% like the Flames could use a guy who plays a ton of PP time, would be far better than Dube, Lucic, Backlund on the second unit.

Dube's stats could even be inflated compared to Olofsson cause he didn't have to play in Buffalo, this statistically, even the basic ones that you can understand was Olofsson's worst season and Dube's best, Olofsson was better..

The CapFriendly circle jerk Flames fans will continue to wank though!

PS, don't try edit your comments to take out insults, own it ya little goof ball!
17 juin 2021 à 17 h 3
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,232
Mentions "j'aime": 419
Quoting: FanOfBread
So you'd argue that Olofsson's increased playing time is the reason he has significantly less giveaways last season? Points per 60, Olofsson still out produced. Over the last three seasons Olofsson out produced Dube at even strength in less games, and significantly out produced him on the power play, it's almost as if a team in the bottom third of the league in PP% like the Flames could use a guy who plays a ton of PP time, would be far better than Dube, Lucic, Backlund on the second unit.

Dube's stats could even be inflated compared to Olofsson cause he didn't have to play in Buffalo, this statistically, even the basic ones that you can understand was Olofsson's worst season and Dube's best, Olofsson was better..

The CapFriendly circle jerk Flames fans will continue to wank though!

PS, don't try edit your comments to take out insults, own it ya little goof ball!
Do you actually take giveaway stats seriously? The way the NHL tracks them is beyond flawed since every turnover is listed as either a giveaway or a takeaway but never both. The more you most, the more you convince me that what you know about hockey could be printed on a postage stamp
17 juin 2021 à 17 h 6
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 62
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: Lunatik
Do you actually take giveaway stats seriously? The way the NHL tracks them is beyond flawed since every turnover is listed as either a giveaway or a takeaway but never both. The more you most, the more you convince me that what you know about hockey could be printed on a postage stamp


HAHAHA, I am simplifying it for you as you clearly didn't understand basic metrics the other day, and by your logic, significantly more playing time means that Olofsson's stats are inflated right??
Look at this cherry picked comment you just returned, you clearly just ignore stuff when you are incredibly wrong. Talk about the comment above or move along with your tail tucked. It's okay to be wrong.
17 juin 2021 à 17 h 47
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 591
Mentions "j'aime": 208
Quoting: QuackAttack
At least his career won’t be wasted in Buffacrap 💀


It might be lol
17 juin 2021 à 19 h 9
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
honestly if that's all it costs to get Ristolainen, I'm in on that one.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage